{"title":"“开肺”复吸对烧伤合并吸入性损伤患者Ards的影响。","authors":"T D Hung, N N Lam","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to determine the safety and impact of open lung strategy ventilation on inhalation injury patients complicated with ARDS. A prospective study was conducted in 33 inhalation injury patients with ARDS who were randomly divided into a control group (ventilated as ARDS net) and a study group (ventilated with open lung strategy). All patients were ventilated with volume control mode until weaning. The results indicated that open lung procedure was safe in most patients with optimal PEEP of 14.31±1.89 cm H2O. Within the first week of ventilation, respiratory system static compliances and PaO2/FiO2 ratio significantly increased in both groups (p<.05) but at a faster rate for the study group (p<.05). Ventilation duration and length of ICU stay were not significantly different across groups (p>.05). Duration time from ARDS onset to death and from admission to death were remarkably longer in the study group (p<.05). However, mortality rate and cause of death were not significantly different within 28 days post burn injury. Open lung recruitment is feasible and could be applied for inhalation injury induced ARDS to improve oxygenation and survival time. Further trials need to be conducted to find out the effectiveness of this strategy on mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":8392,"journal":{"name":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067139/pdf/Ann-Burns-and-Fire-Disasters-35-209.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence Of \\\"Open Lung\\\" Recruitment On Ards In Burn Patients With Inhalation Injury.\",\"authors\":\"T D Hung, N N Lam\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to determine the safety and impact of open lung strategy ventilation on inhalation injury patients complicated with ARDS. A prospective study was conducted in 33 inhalation injury patients with ARDS who were randomly divided into a control group (ventilated as ARDS net) and a study group (ventilated with open lung strategy). All patients were ventilated with volume control mode until weaning. The results indicated that open lung procedure was safe in most patients with optimal PEEP of 14.31±1.89 cm H2O. Within the first week of ventilation, respiratory system static compliances and PaO2/FiO2 ratio significantly increased in both groups (p<.05) but at a faster rate for the study group (p<.05). Ventilation duration and length of ICU stay were not significantly different across groups (p>.05). Duration time from ARDS onset to death and from admission to death were remarkably longer in the study group (p<.05). However, mortality rate and cause of death were not significantly different within 28 days post burn injury. Open lung recruitment is feasible and could be applied for inhalation injury induced ARDS to improve oxygenation and survival time. Further trials need to be conducted to find out the effectiveness of this strategy on mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of burns and fire disasters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10067139/pdf/Ann-Burns-and-Fire-Disasters-35-209.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of burns and fire disasters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是确定开放肺策略通气对吸入性损伤合并ARDS患者的安全性和影响。对33例吸入性损伤合并ARDS患者进行前瞻性研究,随机分为对照组(ARDS净通气)和研究组(开肺通气)。所有患者均以容量控制模式通气至脱机。结果表明,大多数患者的最佳PEEP为14.31±1.89 cm H2O时,开肺手术是安全的。通气1周内,两组患者呼吸系统静态顺应性及PaO2/FiO2比值均显著升高(p < 0.05)。研究组从ARDS发病到死亡和入院到死亡的持续时间明显更长(p
Influence Of "Open Lung" Recruitment On Ards In Burn Patients With Inhalation Injury.
The aim of this study was to determine the safety and impact of open lung strategy ventilation on inhalation injury patients complicated with ARDS. A prospective study was conducted in 33 inhalation injury patients with ARDS who were randomly divided into a control group (ventilated as ARDS net) and a study group (ventilated with open lung strategy). All patients were ventilated with volume control mode until weaning. The results indicated that open lung procedure was safe in most patients with optimal PEEP of 14.31±1.89 cm H2O. Within the first week of ventilation, respiratory system static compliances and PaO2/FiO2 ratio significantly increased in both groups (p<.05) but at a faster rate for the study group (p<.05). Ventilation duration and length of ICU stay were not significantly different across groups (p>.05). Duration time from ARDS onset to death and from admission to death were remarkably longer in the study group (p<.05). However, mortality rate and cause of death were not significantly different within 28 days post burn injury. Open lung recruitment is feasible and could be applied for inhalation injury induced ARDS to improve oxygenation and survival time. Further trials need to be conducted to find out the effectiveness of this strategy on mortality.
期刊介绍:
"Annals of Burns and Fire Disasters" is the official publication of the Euro-Mediterranean Council for Burns and Fire Disasters (MBC) and the European Burns Association (EBA). It is a peer-reviewed journal directed to an audience of medical as well as paramedical personnel involved in the management of burn injuries. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research, scientific advances. It publishes also selected abstracts from international journals.