临床判断和信息学:使用奥马哈系统的编码模拟。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Nursing Education Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.3928/01484834-20230208-07
Marshall Muehlbauer, Cynthia Bradley, Jenna Marquard, Karen A Monsen
{"title":"临床判断和信息学:使用奥马哈系统的编码模拟。","authors":"Marshall Muehlbauer,&nbsp;Cynthia Bradley,&nbsp;Jenna Marquard,&nbsp;Karen A Monsen","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20230208-07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical judgment is a critical nursing competency. Unfolding case study is a pedagogy used to develop clinical judgment. The Omaha System is an accepted taxonomy for standardizing nursing documentation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An unfolding case study was developed from a simulation scenario by encoding 33 nursing interventions with the Omaha System, then developed multiple true-false response items which were sent electronically in survey format to prelicensure baccalaureate nursing students. Differences between identified essential and distractor interventions were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i> = 101) identified correct interventions (<i>M</i> = 74.6%, standard deviation [SD] = 12%). A paired t-test indicated the percentage of correctly identified essential interventions (<i>M</i> = 78%, <i>SD</i> = 18.7%) was significantly higher than distractor interventions (<i>M</i> = 67%, <i>SD</i> = 18%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Nursing students can identify appropriate interventions using the Omaha System, demonstrating potential to extend highly effective and low-cost learning experiences using unfolding case study and multiple true-false response items. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2023;62(4):237-239.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":54781,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Judgment and Informatics: Encoding Simulations Using the Omaha System.\",\"authors\":\"Marshall Muehlbauer,&nbsp;Cynthia Bradley,&nbsp;Jenna Marquard,&nbsp;Karen A Monsen\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/01484834-20230208-07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical judgment is a critical nursing competency. Unfolding case study is a pedagogy used to develop clinical judgment. The Omaha System is an accepted taxonomy for standardizing nursing documentation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An unfolding case study was developed from a simulation scenario by encoding 33 nursing interventions with the Omaha System, then developed multiple true-false response items which were sent electronically in survey format to prelicensure baccalaureate nursing students. Differences between identified essential and distractor interventions were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i> = 101) identified correct interventions (<i>M</i> = 74.6%, standard deviation [SD] = 12%). A paired t-test indicated the percentage of correctly identified essential interventions (<i>M</i> = 78%, <i>SD</i> = 18.7%) was significantly higher than distractor interventions (<i>M</i> = 67%, <i>SD</i> = 18%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Nursing students can identify appropriate interventions using the Omaha System, demonstrating potential to extend highly effective and low-cost learning experiences using unfolding case study and multiple true-false response items. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2023;62(4):237-239.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20230208-07\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20230208-07","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床判断能力是一项重要的护理能力。展开案例研究是一种用于发展临床判断的教学法。奥马哈系统是标准化护理文件的公认分类法。方法:在模拟情景的基础上,采用奥马哈系统对33项护理干预措施进行编码,形成一个展开式的案例研究,并编制多个真假回答项目,以问卷形式电子发送给护理学士学位预科生。评估确定的基本干预措施和干扰干预措施之间的差异。结果:参与者(n = 101)识别出正确的干预措施(M = 74.6%,标准差[SD] = 12%)。配对t检验显示,正确识别基本干预措施的百分比(M = 78%, SD = 18.7%)显著高于分心干预措施(M = 67%, SD = 18%)。讨论:护理专业学生可以使用奥马哈系统识别适当的干预措施,通过展开案例研究和多个真假反应项目,展示了扩展高效和低成本学习经验的潜力。[J].中国生物医学工程学报,2009;32(4):379 - 379。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Judgment and Informatics: Encoding Simulations Using the Omaha System.

Background: Clinical judgment is a critical nursing competency. Unfolding case study is a pedagogy used to develop clinical judgment. The Omaha System is an accepted taxonomy for standardizing nursing documentation.

Method: An unfolding case study was developed from a simulation scenario by encoding 33 nursing interventions with the Omaha System, then developed multiple true-false response items which were sent electronically in survey format to prelicensure baccalaureate nursing students. Differences between identified essential and distractor interventions were evaluated.

Results: Participants (n = 101) identified correct interventions (M = 74.6%, standard deviation [SD] = 12%). A paired t-test indicated the percentage of correctly identified essential interventions (M = 78%, SD = 18.7%) was significantly higher than distractor interventions (M = 67%, SD = 18%).

Discussion: Nursing students can identify appropriate interventions using the Omaha System, demonstrating potential to extend highly effective and low-cost learning experiences using unfolding case study and multiple true-false response items. [J Nurs Educ. 2023;62(4):237-239.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Education is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles and new ideas for nurse educators in various types and levels of nursing programs for over 50 years. The Journal enhances the teaching-learning process, promotes curriculum development, and stimulates creative innovation and research in nursing education.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of the Power of NursingTM on Classroom Connectedness. Unveiling the SChematic Organization of Pharmacological Information for Nurses: A New Approach to Pharmacology Education for Nurses. Simulation Experiences Focusing on Addressing Culturally Based Hidden Bias and RacisM (A-CHARM). Simulation Expert Modeling to Teach Sensitive Screening in Nursing Education. Incorporating Social Needs Screening in Simulation for Family Nurse Practitioner Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1