修订的定义分级:一项试点研究。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Nursing Education Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.3928/01484834-20230208-01
Terri W Enslein, Brenda Wiles, Kaelene Acosta, Angel Hoch
{"title":"修订的定义分级:一项试点研究。","authors":"Terri W Enslein,&nbsp;Brenda Wiles,&nbsp;Kaelene Acosta,&nbsp;Angel Hoch","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20230208-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Grades often are an unreliable means of determining content mastery due to poor grading systems and grade inflation. The use of a modified definitional grading system may be beneficial for assessing mastery of content in competency-based education in didactic nursing courses.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This mixed-methods pilot study examined grade-related data and survey results. Purposive sampling was used to recruit prelicensure freshman nursing students (<i>n</i> = 84) enrolled in a didactic nursing course. The aims were to explore student content mastery in a prelicensure didactic nursing course that used a modified definitional grading system and to evaluate course design elements well-suited for use with competency-based education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative data showed improved individual and overall examination scores but did not significantly affect students' final course grade. Three themes emerged: motivation and diligence, stress, and highlighting of student weaknesses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A modified definitional grading system has the potential to add value and meaning to grades, improve study habits, and improve content mastery. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2023;62(4):215-223.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":54781,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modified Definitional Grading: A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Terri W Enslein,&nbsp;Brenda Wiles,&nbsp;Kaelene Acosta,&nbsp;Angel Hoch\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/01484834-20230208-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Grades often are an unreliable means of determining content mastery due to poor grading systems and grade inflation. The use of a modified definitional grading system may be beneficial for assessing mastery of content in competency-based education in didactic nursing courses.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This mixed-methods pilot study examined grade-related data and survey results. Purposive sampling was used to recruit prelicensure freshman nursing students (<i>n</i> = 84) enrolled in a didactic nursing course. The aims were to explore student content mastery in a prelicensure didactic nursing course that used a modified definitional grading system and to evaluate course design elements well-suited for use with competency-based education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative data showed improved individual and overall examination scores but did not significantly affect students' final course grade. Three themes emerged: motivation and diligence, stress, and highlighting of student weaknesses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A modified definitional grading system has the potential to add value and meaning to grades, improve study habits, and improve content mastery. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2023;62(4):215-223.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20230208-01\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20230208-01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于糟糕的评分系统和分数膨胀,分数通常是一种不可靠的决定内容掌握程度的手段。使用改进的定义评分系统可能有利于评估教学护理课程中以能力为基础的教育内容的掌握程度。方法:这个混合方法的试点研究检查了与年级相关的数据和调查结果。采用有目的抽样的方法,对注册参加护理教学课程的护理大一学生(n = 84)进行调查。目的是探索学生对执照前教学护理课程内容的掌握程度,该课程使用修改的定义评分系统,并评估课程设计元素,非常适合使用能力为基础的教育。结果:定量数据显示,个人和整体考试成绩有所提高,但对学生的最终课程成绩没有显著影响。三个主题出现了:动机和勤奋,压力,以及突出学生的弱点。结论:修改后的定义评分系统有可能增加分数的价值和意义,改善学习习惯,提高对内容的掌握。[J].中国生物医学工程学报,2009;32(4):559 - 561。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modified Definitional Grading: A Pilot Study.

Background: Grades often are an unreliable means of determining content mastery due to poor grading systems and grade inflation. The use of a modified definitional grading system may be beneficial for assessing mastery of content in competency-based education in didactic nursing courses.

Method: This mixed-methods pilot study examined grade-related data and survey results. Purposive sampling was used to recruit prelicensure freshman nursing students (n = 84) enrolled in a didactic nursing course. The aims were to explore student content mastery in a prelicensure didactic nursing course that used a modified definitional grading system and to evaluate course design elements well-suited for use with competency-based education.

Results: Quantitative data showed improved individual and overall examination scores but did not significantly affect students' final course grade. Three themes emerged: motivation and diligence, stress, and highlighting of student weaknesses.

Conclusion: A modified definitional grading system has the potential to add value and meaning to grades, improve study habits, and improve content mastery. [J Nurs Educ. 2023;62(4):215-223.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Education is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles and new ideas for nurse educators in various types and levels of nursing programs for over 50 years. The Journal enhances the teaching-learning process, promotes curriculum development, and stimulates creative innovation and research in nursing education.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of the Power of NursingTM on Classroom Connectedness. Unveiling the SChematic Organization of Pharmacological Information for Nurses: A New Approach to Pharmacology Education for Nurses. Simulation Experiences Focusing on Addressing Culturally Based Hidden Bias and RacisM (A-CHARM). Simulation Expert Modeling to Teach Sensitive Screening in Nursing Education. Incorporating Social Needs Screening in Simulation for Family Nurse Practitioner Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1