Sydney N Ingel, Tess K Drazdowski, Danielle S Rudes, Michael R McCart, Jason E Chapman, Faye S Taxman, Ashli J Sheidow
{"title":"青少年感化官对制裁和激励作为合规策略的认知。","authors":"Sydney N Ingel, Tess K Drazdowski, Danielle S Rudes, Michael R McCart, Jason E Chapman, Faye S Taxman, Ashli J Sheidow","doi":"10.52935/22.9147.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In juvenile probation, noncompliance with probation conditions is a common occurrence. To deal with this, juvenile probation officers (JPOs) may use different strategies, such as sanctions and incentives. This study uses survey and focus group data from 19 JPOs to evaluate their perceptions of the effectiveness of sanctions and incentives in reducing youth noncompliance, specifically in the form of substance use. Results show that there are two distinct groups of JPOs: those who believe sanctions are an effective deterrent strategy and those who do not. Perceptually and demographically these two groups contain significant differences. Notably, both groups have similar views of social incentives, but JPOs who believe sanctions are ineffective are significantly more likely to have positive views of tangible incentives. This study has implications for how the field of juvenile probation can target JPO perceptions to move toward incentive-based strategies rather than sanction-based strategies for reducing youth substance use.</p>","PeriodicalId":73606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied juvenile justice services","volume":"2022 ","pages":"27-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10061776/pdf/nihms-1863534.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Juvenile Probation Officers' Perceptions of Sanctions and Incentives as Compliance Strategies.\",\"authors\":\"Sydney N Ingel, Tess K Drazdowski, Danielle S Rudes, Michael R McCart, Jason E Chapman, Faye S Taxman, Ashli J Sheidow\",\"doi\":\"10.52935/22.9147.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In juvenile probation, noncompliance with probation conditions is a common occurrence. To deal with this, juvenile probation officers (JPOs) may use different strategies, such as sanctions and incentives. This study uses survey and focus group data from 19 JPOs to evaluate their perceptions of the effectiveness of sanctions and incentives in reducing youth noncompliance, specifically in the form of substance use. Results show that there are two distinct groups of JPOs: those who believe sanctions are an effective deterrent strategy and those who do not. Perceptually and demographically these two groups contain significant differences. Notably, both groups have similar views of social incentives, but JPOs who believe sanctions are ineffective are significantly more likely to have positive views of tangible incentives. This study has implications for how the field of juvenile probation can target JPO perceptions to move toward incentive-based strategies rather than sanction-based strategies for reducing youth substance use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied juvenile justice services\",\"volume\":\"2022 \",\"pages\":\"27-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10061776/pdf/nihms-1863534.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied juvenile justice services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52935/22.9147.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied juvenile justice services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52935/22.9147.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Juvenile Probation Officers' Perceptions of Sanctions and Incentives as Compliance Strategies.
In juvenile probation, noncompliance with probation conditions is a common occurrence. To deal with this, juvenile probation officers (JPOs) may use different strategies, such as sanctions and incentives. This study uses survey and focus group data from 19 JPOs to evaluate their perceptions of the effectiveness of sanctions and incentives in reducing youth noncompliance, specifically in the form of substance use. Results show that there are two distinct groups of JPOs: those who believe sanctions are an effective deterrent strategy and those who do not. Perceptually and demographically these two groups contain significant differences. Notably, both groups have similar views of social incentives, but JPOs who believe sanctions are ineffective are significantly more likely to have positive views of tangible incentives. This study has implications for how the field of juvenile probation can target JPO perceptions to move toward incentive-based strategies rather than sanction-based strategies for reducing youth substance use.