品牌个性对以顾客为基础的品牌资产的影响是如何随时间变化的?来自18年面板数据集的纵向证据。

IF 9.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s11747-022-00895-2
Jonathan Luffarelli, Sebastiano A Delre, Polina Landgraf
{"title":"品牌个性对以顾客为基础的品牌资产的影响是如何随时间变化的?来自18年面板数据集的纵向证据。","authors":"Jonathan Luffarelli,&nbsp;Sebastiano A Delre,&nbsp;Polina Landgraf","doi":"10.1007/s11747-022-00895-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using a panel data set (n = 49,626), this research tests opposing hypotheses about the influence of brand personality dimensions (BPDs) on customer-based brand equity (CBBE) and the evolution of this influence over an 18-year period. The results show that, on average, the BPDs of excitement, competence, and sincerity have more positive effects on CBBE than sophistication and ruggedness. Furthermore, the effects of sincerity, sophistication, and ruggedness on CBBE have declined over time while the effects of excitement and competence have grown more positive: A 1% change in excitement is associated with a .45% change in CBBE in 2001 and a .71% change in 2018 (a 58% increase), while a 1% change in competence is associated with a .42% change in CBBE in 2001 and a .60% change in 2018 (a 43% increase). How these effects vary between countries, industry sectors, and brand types is also explored.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11747-022-00895-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":17194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","volume":"51 3","pages":"598-616"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375090/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How has the effect of brand personality on customer-based brand equity changed over time? Longitudinal evidence from a panel data set spanning 18 years.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Luffarelli,&nbsp;Sebastiano A Delre,&nbsp;Polina Landgraf\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11747-022-00895-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Using a panel data set (n = 49,626), this research tests opposing hypotheses about the influence of brand personality dimensions (BPDs) on customer-based brand equity (CBBE) and the evolution of this influence over an 18-year period. The results show that, on average, the BPDs of excitement, competence, and sincerity have more positive effects on CBBE than sophistication and ruggedness. Furthermore, the effects of sincerity, sophistication, and ruggedness on CBBE have declined over time while the effects of excitement and competence have grown more positive: A 1% change in excitement is associated with a .45% change in CBBE in 2001 and a .71% change in 2018 (a 58% increase), while a 1% change in competence is associated with a .42% change in CBBE in 2001 and a .60% change in 2018 (a 43% increase). How these effects vary between countries, industry sectors, and brand types is also explored.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11747-022-00895-2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science\",\"volume\":\"51 3\",\"pages\":\"598-616\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9375090/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-022-00895-2\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-022-00895-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

使用面板数据集(n = 49,626),本研究检验了关于品牌个性维度(bpd)对基于客户的品牌资产(CBBE)的影响的对立假设,以及这种影响在18年期间的演变。结果表明,平均而言,兴奋、胜任和真诚的bpd对CBBE的积极影响大于老练和粗犷。此外,真诚、成熟和坚固对CBBE的影响随着时间的推移而下降,而兴奋和能力的影响变得更加积极:兴奋程度变化1%,CBBE在2001年变化0.45%,在2018年变化0.71%(增加58%),而能力变化1%,CBBE在2001年变化0.42%,在2018年变化0.60%(增加43%)。研究还探讨了这些影响在不同国家、行业部门和品牌类型之间的差异。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,可在10.1007/s11747-022-00895-2获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How has the effect of brand personality on customer-based brand equity changed over time? Longitudinal evidence from a panel data set spanning 18 years.

Using a panel data set (n = 49,626), this research tests opposing hypotheses about the influence of brand personality dimensions (BPDs) on customer-based brand equity (CBBE) and the evolution of this influence over an 18-year period. The results show that, on average, the BPDs of excitement, competence, and sincerity have more positive effects on CBBE than sophistication and ruggedness. Furthermore, the effects of sincerity, sophistication, and ruggedness on CBBE have declined over time while the effects of excitement and competence have grown more positive: A 1% change in excitement is associated with a .45% change in CBBE in 2001 and a .71% change in 2018 (a 58% increase), while a 1% change in competence is associated with a .42% change in CBBE in 2001 and a .60% change in 2018 (a 43% increase). How these effects vary between countries, industry sectors, and brand types is also explored.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11747-022-00895-2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
30.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: JAMS, also known as The Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, plays a crucial role in bridging the gap between scholarly research and practical application in the realm of marketing. Its primary objective is to study and enhance marketing practices by publishing research-driven articles. When manuscripts are submitted to JAMS for publication, they are evaluated based on their potential to contribute to the advancement of marketing science and practice.
期刊最新文献
There is business like show business! What marketing scholars and managers can learn from 40 years of entertainment science research Expressions of customer rumination in online posts and firm responses Crossing incentive alignment and adaptive designs in choice-based conjoint: A fruitful endeavor Silently killing your panelists one email at a time: The true cost of email solicitations Engaging customers and suppliers for environmental sustainability: Investigating the drivers and the effects on firm performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1