在人群筛查中优先检测罕见致病变体

IF 39.1 1区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY Nature Reviews Genetics Pub Date : 2023-01-13 DOI:10.1038/s41576-022-00571-9
Paul Lacaze, Ranjit Manchanda, Robert C. Green
{"title":"在人群筛查中优先检测罕见致病变体","authors":"Paul Lacaze, Ranjit Manchanda, Robert C. Green","doi":"10.1038/s41576-022-00571-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Population genomic screening to detect carriers of rare monogenic variants for medically actionable conditions is supported by substantial evidence of clinical utility and cost effectiveness. Much less evidence supports screening by polygenic risk scores, which do not detect rare variants. Using only polygenic scores in population screening initiatives, while ignoring the detection of higher-risk rare monogenic variants, is ill-advised. Lacaze et al. caution against the use of polygenic scores alone for population screening in the absence of monogenic testing.","PeriodicalId":19067,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Genetics","volume":"24 4","pages":"205-206"},"PeriodicalIF":39.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prioritizing the detection of rare pathogenic variants in population screening\",\"authors\":\"Paul Lacaze, Ranjit Manchanda, Robert C. Green\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41576-022-00571-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Population genomic screening to detect carriers of rare monogenic variants for medically actionable conditions is supported by substantial evidence of clinical utility and cost effectiveness. Much less evidence supports screening by polygenic risk scores, which do not detect rare variants. Using only polygenic scores in population screening initiatives, while ignoring the detection of higher-risk rare monogenic variants, is ill-advised. Lacaze et al. caution against the use of polygenic scores alone for population screening in the absence of monogenic testing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Genetics\",\"volume\":\"24 4\",\"pages\":\"205-206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":39.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41576-022-00571-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41576-022-00571-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

通过人群基因组筛查来检测罕见单基因变异的携带者,以发现可采取医疗措施的病症 在临床效用和成本效益方面得到了大量证据的支持。支持通过多基因风险评分进行筛查的证据要少得多,因为多基因风险评分无法检测到罕见变异。在人群筛查行动中仅使用多基因评分,而忽视对高风险罕见单基因变异的检测,是不明智的。Lacaze 等人告诫人们,在缺乏单基因检测的情况下,不要仅使用多基因评分进行人群筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prioritizing the detection of rare pathogenic variants in population screening
Population genomic screening to detect carriers of rare monogenic variants for medically actionable conditions is supported by substantial evidence of clinical utility and cost effectiveness. Much less evidence supports screening by polygenic risk scores, which do not detect rare variants. Using only polygenic scores in population screening initiatives, while ignoring the detection of higher-risk rare monogenic variants, is ill-advised. Lacaze et al. caution against the use of polygenic scores alone for population screening in the absence of monogenic testing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Reviews Genetics
Nature Reviews Genetics 生物-遗传学
CiteScore
57.40
自引率
0.50%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: At Nature Reviews Genetics, our goal is to be the leading source of reviews and commentaries for the scientific communities we serve. We are dedicated to publishing authoritative articles that are easily accessible to our readers. We believe in enhancing our articles with clear and understandable figures, tables, and other display items. Our aim is to provide an unparalleled service to authors, referees, and readers, and we are committed to maximizing the usefulness and impact of each article we publish. Within our journal, we publish a range of content including Research Highlights, Comments, Reviews, and Perspectives that are relevant to geneticists and genomicists. With our broad scope, we ensure that the articles we publish reach the widest possible audience. As part of the Nature Reviews portfolio of journals, we strive to uphold the high standards and reputation associated with this esteemed collection of publications.
期刊最新文献
Biobanking with genetics shapes precision medicine and global health Plant pattern recognition receptors: from evolutionary insight to engineering Genetic conflict and its resolution between the sexes Exploring biodiversity through museomics The design and engineering of synthetic genomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1