桡骨隧道综合征的骨科治疗:诊断和治疗的困境。

IF 0.9 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Eurasian Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.5152/eurasianjmed.2023.22274
Muhammed Çağatay Engin, Mehmet Demirel, Abdullah Kahraman, Ömer Ayık
{"title":"桡骨隧道综合征的骨科治疗:诊断和治疗的困境。","authors":"Muhammed Çağatay Engin,&nbsp;Mehmet Demirel,&nbsp;Abdullah Kahraman,&nbsp;Ömer Ayık","doi":"10.5152/eurasianjmed.2023.22274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The first-line treatment for radial tunnel syndrome is conservative despite limited evidence concerning its efficiency. Surgical release is indicated if nonsurgical measures fail. Radial tunnel syndrome cases may be misdiagnosed as the more common lateral epicondylitis, and misdiagnosing radial tunnel syndrome causes wrong treatment and, thus, the perpetuation or increase of the pain. Although radial tunnel syndrome is a rare disorder, such cases can be encountered in tertiary hand surgery centers. This study aimed to present our experience in diagnosing and managing patients with radial tunnel syndrome.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Eighteen patients (7 male, 11 female; mean age=41.5 years, age range=22-61) in whom radial tunnel syndrome was diagnosed and treated at a single tertiary care center were retrospectively reviewed and included. Previous diagnoses (wrong diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, missed diagnosis, and other), previous treatments for such diagnoses, and their results before presenting to our institution were recorded. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire score and visual analog scale score were recorded before the surgery and at the final follow-up appointment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the patients included in the study underwent steroid injections. Eleven patients (11/18, 61%) benefited from steroid injection and conservative treatment. The remaining 7 patients refractory to conservative treatment were offered surgical treatment. Of these, 6 patients accepted surgery while 1 did not accept it. In all patients, the mean visual analog scale score significantly improved from 6.38 (range: 5-8) to 2.1 (range: 0-7) (P < .001). The mean quick-disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire scores were significantly improved from 43.4 (range: 31.8-52.5) preoperatively to 8.7 (range: 0-45.5) at the final follow-up (P < .001). In the surgical treatment group, the mean visual analog scale score significantly improved from 6.1 (range: 5-7) to 1.2 (range: 0-4) (P < .001). The mean quick-disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire scores were significantly improved from 37.4 (range: 31.2-45.5) preoperatively to 4.7 (range: 0-13.6) at the final follow-up (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our experience has shown that satisfactory results can be obtained by surgical treatment for patients with radial tunnel syndrome refractory to nonsurgical treatment whose diagnosis is confirmed by a thorough physical examination.</p>","PeriodicalId":53592,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081130/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Orthopedic Management of Radial Tunnel Syndrome: A Diagnostic and Treatment Dilemma.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammed Çağatay Engin,&nbsp;Mehmet Demirel,&nbsp;Abdullah Kahraman,&nbsp;Ömer Ayık\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/eurasianjmed.2023.22274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The first-line treatment for radial tunnel syndrome is conservative despite limited evidence concerning its efficiency. Surgical release is indicated if nonsurgical measures fail. Radial tunnel syndrome cases may be misdiagnosed as the more common lateral epicondylitis, and misdiagnosing radial tunnel syndrome causes wrong treatment and, thus, the perpetuation or increase of the pain. Although radial tunnel syndrome is a rare disorder, such cases can be encountered in tertiary hand surgery centers. This study aimed to present our experience in diagnosing and managing patients with radial tunnel syndrome.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Eighteen patients (7 male, 11 female; mean age=41.5 years, age range=22-61) in whom radial tunnel syndrome was diagnosed and treated at a single tertiary care center were retrospectively reviewed and included. Previous diagnoses (wrong diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, missed diagnosis, and other), previous treatments for such diagnoses, and their results before presenting to our institution were recorded. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire score and visual analog scale score were recorded before the surgery and at the final follow-up appointment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the patients included in the study underwent steroid injections. Eleven patients (11/18, 61%) benefited from steroid injection and conservative treatment. The remaining 7 patients refractory to conservative treatment were offered surgical treatment. Of these, 6 patients accepted surgery while 1 did not accept it. In all patients, the mean visual analog scale score significantly improved from 6.38 (range: 5-8) to 2.1 (range: 0-7) (P < .001). The mean quick-disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire scores were significantly improved from 43.4 (range: 31.8-52.5) preoperatively to 8.7 (range: 0-45.5) at the final follow-up (P < .001). In the surgical treatment group, the mean visual analog scale score significantly improved from 6.1 (range: 5-7) to 1.2 (range: 0-4) (P < .001). The mean quick-disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire scores were significantly improved from 37.4 (range: 31.2-45.5) preoperatively to 4.7 (range: 0-13.6) at the final follow-up (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our experience has shown that satisfactory results can be obtained by surgical treatment for patients with radial tunnel syndrome refractory to nonsurgical treatment whose diagnosis is confirmed by a thorough physical examination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurasian Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081130/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurasian Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2023.22274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2023.22274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:桡骨隧道综合征的一线治疗方法是保守的,尽管有关其有效性的证据有限。如果非手术措施失败,则需要手术释放。桡骨隧道综合征的病例可能误诊为更常见的外上髁炎,误诊桡骨隧道综合征会导致错误的治疗,从而使疼痛持续或加重。虽然桡骨隧道综合征是一种罕见的疾病,但这类病例可以在三级手外科中心遇到。本研究旨在介绍我们诊断和治疗桡骨隧道综合征的经验。材料与方法:18例患者(男7例,女11例;平均年龄41.5岁,年龄范围22-61岁),在单一三级保健中心诊断和治疗桡骨隧道综合征的患者进行回顾性分析和纳入。记录以往的诊断(误诊、延误诊断、漏诊等)、此类诊断的既往治疗以及来我院就诊前的结果。在手术前和最后随访预约时分别记录手臂、肩膀和手的缩短残疾问卷得分和视觉模拟量表得分。结果:所有纳入研究的患者均接受了类固醇注射。11例患者(11/18,61%)受益于类固醇注射和保守治疗。其余7例保守治疗难治性患者行手术治疗。其中6例接受手术,1例不接受手术。在所有患者中,平均视觉模拟量表评分从6.38(范围:5-8)显著改善到2.1(范围:0-7)(P < 0.001)。手臂、肩部和手部的平均快速残疾问卷得分从术前的43.4分(范围:31.8-52.5分)显著改善到最终随访时的8.7分(范围:0-45.5分)(P < 0.001)。手术治疗组的平均视觉模拟评分由6.1(范围5-7)提高到1.2(范围0-4),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。手臂、肩部和手部的平均快速残疾问卷得分从术前的37.4分(范围:31.2-45.5分)显著改善到最终随访时的4.7分(范围:0-13.6分)(P < 0.001)。结论:我们的经验表明,手术治疗对非手术治疗难治性桡骨隧道综合征患者可获得满意的结果,其诊断经彻底的体格检查证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Orthopedic Management of Radial Tunnel Syndrome: A Diagnostic and Treatment Dilemma.

Objective: The first-line treatment for radial tunnel syndrome is conservative despite limited evidence concerning its efficiency. Surgical release is indicated if nonsurgical measures fail. Radial tunnel syndrome cases may be misdiagnosed as the more common lateral epicondylitis, and misdiagnosing radial tunnel syndrome causes wrong treatment and, thus, the perpetuation or increase of the pain. Although radial tunnel syndrome is a rare disorder, such cases can be encountered in tertiary hand surgery centers. This study aimed to present our experience in diagnosing and managing patients with radial tunnel syndrome.

Material and methods: Eighteen patients (7 male, 11 female; mean age=41.5 years, age range=22-61) in whom radial tunnel syndrome was diagnosed and treated at a single tertiary care center were retrospectively reviewed and included. Previous diagnoses (wrong diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, missed diagnosis, and other), previous treatments for such diagnoses, and their results before presenting to our institution were recorded. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire score and visual analog scale score were recorded before the surgery and at the final follow-up appointment.

Results: All the patients included in the study underwent steroid injections. Eleven patients (11/18, 61%) benefited from steroid injection and conservative treatment. The remaining 7 patients refractory to conservative treatment were offered surgical treatment. Of these, 6 patients accepted surgery while 1 did not accept it. In all patients, the mean visual analog scale score significantly improved from 6.38 (range: 5-8) to 2.1 (range: 0-7) (P < .001). The mean quick-disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire scores were significantly improved from 43.4 (range: 31.8-52.5) preoperatively to 8.7 (range: 0-45.5) at the final follow-up (P < .001). In the surgical treatment group, the mean visual analog scale score significantly improved from 6.1 (range: 5-7) to 1.2 (range: 0-4) (P < .001). The mean quick-disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire scores were significantly improved from 37.4 (range: 31.2-45.5) preoperatively to 4.7 (range: 0-13.6) at the final follow-up (P < .001).

Conclusion: Our experience has shown that satisfactory results can be obtained by surgical treatment for patients with radial tunnel syndrome refractory to nonsurgical treatment whose diagnosis is confirmed by a thorough physical examination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Eurasian Journal of Medicine
Eurasian Journal of Medicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
59
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Eurasian Journal of Medicine (Eurasian J Med) is an international, scientific, open access periodical published by independent, unbiased, and triple-blinded peer-review principles. The journal is the official publication of Atatürk University School of Medicine and published triannually in February, June, and October. The publication language of the journal is English. The aim of the Eurasian Journal of Medicine is to publish original research papers of the highest scientific and clinical value in all medical fields. The Eurasian J Med also includes reviews, editorial short notes and letters to the editor that either as a comment related to recently published articles in our journal or as a case report. The target audience of the journal includes researchers, physicians and healthcare professionals who are interested or working in in all medical disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Oral and Dental Health Results and Competition Stress Levels of Adolescent Athletes in Different Winter Sports Branches. Potential Using of Resveratrol and Its Derivatives in Medicine. The Involvement of the Serotonergic System in Ketamine and Fluoxetine Combination-induced Cognitive Impairments in Mice. The Utility of [18]F-Fluorocholine Positron Emission Computed Tomography and [18]F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography in Evaluating Breast Cancer Phenotypes: A Pilot Study. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy with Low-Energy Flux Density Treatment Applied to Hemiplegia Patients on Somatosensory Functions and Spatiotemporal Parameters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1