预测智能控制早产儿氧合:一项双中心可行性研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Neonatology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000527539
Koen P Dijkman, Tom G Goos, Jeanne P Dieleman, Thilo Mohns, Carola van Pul, Peter Andriessen, André A Kroon, Irwin K Reiss, Hendrik J Niemarkt
{"title":"预测智能控制早产儿氧合:一项双中心可行性研究。","authors":"Koen P Dijkman,&nbsp;Tom G Goos,&nbsp;Jeanne P Dieleman,&nbsp;Thilo Mohns,&nbsp;Carola van Pul,&nbsp;Peter Andriessen,&nbsp;André A Kroon,&nbsp;Irwin K Reiss,&nbsp;Hendrik J Niemarkt","doi":"10.1159/000527539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Supplemental oxygen therapy is a mainstay of modern neonatal intensive care for preterm infants. However, both insufficient and excess oxygen delivery are associated with adverse outcomes. Automated or closed loop FiO2 control has been developed to keep SpO2 within a predefined target range more effectively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of closed loop FiO2 control by Predictive Intelligent Control of Oxygenation (PRICO) on the Fabian ventilator in maintaining SpO2 within a target range (88/89-95%) in preterm infants on different modes of invasive and noninvasive respiratory support. In two tertiary neonatal intensive care units, preterm infants with an FiO2 >0.21 were included and received an 8 h nonblinded treatment period of closed loop FiO2 control by PRICO, flanked by two 8 h control periods of routine manual control (RMC1 and RMC2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>32 preterm infants were included (median gestational age 26 + 5 weeks [IQR 25 + 5-27 + 6], median birthweight 828 grams [IQR 704-930]). Six patients received invasive respiratory support, while 26 received noninvasive respiratory support (18 CPAP, 4 DuoPAP, and 4 nasal IMV). The time percentage within the SpO2 target range was increased with PRICO (74.4% [IQR 67.8-78.5]) compared to RMC1 (65.8% [IQR 51.1-77.8]; p = 0.011) and RMC2 (60.6% [IQR 56.2-66.6]; p < 0.001) with an estimated median difference of 6.0% (95% CI 1.2-11.5) and 9.8% (95% CI 6.0-13.0), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In preterm infants on invasive and noninvasive respiratory supports, closed loop FiO2 control by PRICO compared to RMC is feasible and superior in maintaining SpO2 within target ranges.</p>","PeriodicalId":18924,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Intelligent Control of Oxygenation in Preterm Infants: A Two-Center Feasibility Study.\",\"authors\":\"Koen P Dijkman,&nbsp;Tom G Goos,&nbsp;Jeanne P Dieleman,&nbsp;Thilo Mohns,&nbsp;Carola van Pul,&nbsp;Peter Andriessen,&nbsp;André A Kroon,&nbsp;Irwin K Reiss,&nbsp;Hendrik J Niemarkt\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000527539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Supplemental oxygen therapy is a mainstay of modern neonatal intensive care for preterm infants. However, both insufficient and excess oxygen delivery are associated with adverse outcomes. Automated or closed loop FiO2 control has been developed to keep SpO2 within a predefined target range more effectively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of closed loop FiO2 control by Predictive Intelligent Control of Oxygenation (PRICO) on the Fabian ventilator in maintaining SpO2 within a target range (88/89-95%) in preterm infants on different modes of invasive and noninvasive respiratory support. In two tertiary neonatal intensive care units, preterm infants with an FiO2 >0.21 were included and received an 8 h nonblinded treatment period of closed loop FiO2 control by PRICO, flanked by two 8 h control periods of routine manual control (RMC1 and RMC2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>32 preterm infants were included (median gestational age 26 + 5 weeks [IQR 25 + 5-27 + 6], median birthweight 828 grams [IQR 704-930]). Six patients received invasive respiratory support, while 26 received noninvasive respiratory support (18 CPAP, 4 DuoPAP, and 4 nasal IMV). The time percentage within the SpO2 target range was increased with PRICO (74.4% [IQR 67.8-78.5]) compared to RMC1 (65.8% [IQR 51.1-77.8]; p = 0.011) and RMC2 (60.6% [IQR 56.2-66.6]; p < 0.001) with an estimated median difference of 6.0% (95% CI 1.2-11.5) and 9.8% (95% CI 6.0-13.0), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In preterm infants on invasive and noninvasive respiratory supports, closed loop FiO2 control by PRICO compared to RMC is feasible and superior in maintaining SpO2 within target ranges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18924,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neonatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neonatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000527539\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000527539","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

简介:补充氧治疗是现代新生儿重症监护早产儿的支柱。然而,氧气输送不足和过量都与不良后果有关。自动化或闭环FiO2控制已被开发,以保持SpO2在预定义的目标范围内更有效。方法:本研究旨在探讨采用预测智能氧合控制(PRICO)对费边呼吸机进行闭环FiO2控制,在不同模式的有创和无创呼吸支持下将早产儿SpO2维持在目标范围(88/89-95%)的可行性。在两个三级新生儿重症监护病房,纳入FiO2 >0.21的早产儿,接受8 h的PRICO闭环FiO2控制非盲治疗期,同时进行2个8 h的常规手动控制期(RMC1和RMC2)。结果:纳入32例早产儿(中位胎龄26 + 5周[IQR 25 + 5-27 + 6],中位出生体重828克[IQR 704-930])。6例患者接受有创呼吸支持,26例患者接受无创呼吸支持(CPAP 18例,DuoPAP 4例,鼻IMV 4例)。与RMC1 (65.8% [IQR 51.1-77.8])相比,PRICO (74.4% [IQR 67.8-78.5])增加了SpO2目标范围内的时间百分比;p = 0.011)和RMC2 (60.6% [IQR 56.2-66.6];p < 0.001),估计中位差异分别为6.0% (95% CI 1.2-11.5)和9.8% (95% CI 6.0-13.0)。结论:在有创和无创呼吸支持的早产儿中,与RMC相比,PRICO闭环控制FiO2是可行的,并且在将SpO2维持在目标范围内方面优于RMC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictive Intelligent Control of Oxygenation in Preterm Infants: A Two-Center Feasibility Study.

Introduction: Supplemental oxygen therapy is a mainstay of modern neonatal intensive care for preterm infants. However, both insufficient and excess oxygen delivery are associated with adverse outcomes. Automated or closed loop FiO2 control has been developed to keep SpO2 within a predefined target range more effectively.

Methods: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of closed loop FiO2 control by Predictive Intelligent Control of Oxygenation (PRICO) on the Fabian ventilator in maintaining SpO2 within a target range (88/89-95%) in preterm infants on different modes of invasive and noninvasive respiratory support. In two tertiary neonatal intensive care units, preterm infants with an FiO2 >0.21 were included and received an 8 h nonblinded treatment period of closed loop FiO2 control by PRICO, flanked by two 8 h control periods of routine manual control (RMC1 and RMC2).

Results: 32 preterm infants were included (median gestational age 26 + 5 weeks [IQR 25 + 5-27 + 6], median birthweight 828 grams [IQR 704-930]). Six patients received invasive respiratory support, while 26 received noninvasive respiratory support (18 CPAP, 4 DuoPAP, and 4 nasal IMV). The time percentage within the SpO2 target range was increased with PRICO (74.4% [IQR 67.8-78.5]) compared to RMC1 (65.8% [IQR 51.1-77.8]; p = 0.011) and RMC2 (60.6% [IQR 56.2-66.6]; p < 0.001) with an estimated median difference of 6.0% (95% CI 1.2-11.5) and 9.8% (95% CI 6.0-13.0), respectively.

Conclusion: In preterm infants on invasive and noninvasive respiratory supports, closed loop FiO2 control by PRICO compared to RMC is feasible and superior in maintaining SpO2 within target ranges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neonatology
Neonatology 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This highly respected and frequently cited journal is a prime source of information in the area of fetal and neonatal research. Original papers present research on all aspects of neonatology, fetal medicine and developmental biology. These papers encompass both basic science and clinical research including randomized trials, observational studies and epidemiology. Basic science research covers molecular biology, molecular genetics, physiology, biochemistry and pharmacology in fetal and neonatal life. In addition to the classic features the journal accepts papers for the sections Research Briefings and Sources of Neonatal Medicine (historical pieces). Papers reporting results of animal studies should be based upon hypotheses that relate to developmental processes or disorders in the human fetus or neonate.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Maternal and Perinatal Factors on the Neonatal Electrocardiogram Front & Back Matter Front & Back Matter Front & Back Matter Therapeutic Hypothermia for Neonatal Encephalopathy in Low-Resource Settings: Methodological Inaccuracies and Inconsistencies in the Latest Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1