高流量鼻插管疗法对急性呼吸衰竭老年患者的疗效和安全性。

IF 10.4 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pulmonology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pulmoe.2023.01.004
{"title":"高流量鼻插管疗法对急性呼吸衰竭老年患者的疗效和安全性。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pulmoe.2023.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>To assess the efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in elderly patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) not due to COVID-19, refractory to treatment with conventional oxygen therapy and/or intolerant to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and without criteria for admission to intensive care units (ICU).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Prospective observational study of patients with ARF treated with HFNC who presented clinical and arterial blood gas deterioration after 24 h of medical treatment and oxygenation by conventional systems. The degree of dyspnoea, gas exchange parameters (arterial O<sub>2</sub> pressure/inspired O<sub>2</sub> fraction ratio (PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>); oxygen saturation measured by oximetry/ inspired fraction of oxygen (Sp0<sub>2</sub>/Fi0<sub>2</sub>), ROX index), degree of patient tolerance and mortality were evaluated. These were measured at discharge from the emergency department (ED), 24 h after treatment with conventional oxygenation and 60, 120 min and 24 h after initiation of HFNC. The results were analyzed for all patients as a whole and for patients with hypercapnia (arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO<sub>2</sub>) &lt; 45 mmHg) separately.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>200 patients were included in the study between November 2019 and November 2020, with a mean age of 83 years, predominantly women (61.9%), obese (Body Mass Index (BMI) 31.1), with high comorbidity (Charlson index 4) and mild-moderate degree of dependence (Barthel 60). A number of 128 patients (64%) were hypercapnic. None had respiratory acidosis (pH 7.39). Evaluation at 60 min, 120 min and 24 h showed significant improvement in all patients and in the subgroup of hypercapnic patients with respect to baseline parameters in respiratory rate (RR), dyspnoea, ROX index, PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>, SpO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> and patient comfort. No changes in PaCO<sub>2</sub> or level of consciousness were observed. HFNC was well tolerated. Ten patients (5%) died due to progression of the disease causing ARF.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>HFNC is an effective and safe alternative in elderly patients with ARF not due to COVID-19, refractory to treatment with conventional oxygen therapy and/or intolerant to NIV or CPAP and without criteria for admission to ICU.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54237,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonology","volume":"30 5","pages":"Pages 437-444"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9923444/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula therapy in elderly patients with acute respiratory failure\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pulmoe.2023.01.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>To assess the efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in elderly patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) not due to COVID-19, refractory to treatment with conventional oxygen therapy and/or intolerant to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and without criteria for admission to intensive care units (ICU).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Prospective observational study of patients with ARF treated with HFNC who presented clinical and arterial blood gas deterioration after 24 h of medical treatment and oxygenation by conventional systems. The degree of dyspnoea, gas exchange parameters (arterial O<sub>2</sub> pressure/inspired O<sub>2</sub> fraction ratio (PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>); oxygen saturation measured by oximetry/ inspired fraction of oxygen (Sp0<sub>2</sub>/Fi0<sub>2</sub>), ROX index), degree of patient tolerance and mortality were evaluated. These were measured at discharge from the emergency department (ED), 24 h after treatment with conventional oxygenation and 60, 120 min and 24 h after initiation of HFNC. The results were analyzed for all patients as a whole and for patients with hypercapnia (arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO<sub>2</sub>) &lt; 45 mmHg) separately.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>200 patients were included in the study between November 2019 and November 2020, with a mean age of 83 years, predominantly women (61.9%), obese (Body Mass Index (BMI) 31.1), with high comorbidity (Charlson index 4) and mild-moderate degree of dependence (Barthel 60). A number of 128 patients (64%) were hypercapnic. None had respiratory acidosis (pH 7.39). Evaluation at 60 min, 120 min and 24 h showed significant improvement in all patients and in the subgroup of hypercapnic patients with respect to baseline parameters in respiratory rate (RR), dyspnoea, ROX index, PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>, SpO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> and patient comfort. No changes in PaCO<sub>2</sub> or level of consciousness were observed. HFNC was well tolerated. Ten patients (5%) died due to progression of the disease causing ARF.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>HFNC is an effective and safe alternative in elderly patients with ARF not due to COVID-19, refractory to treatment with conventional oxygen therapy and/or intolerant to NIV or CPAP and without criteria for admission to ICU.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulmonology\",\"volume\":\"30 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 437-444\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9923444/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulmonology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531043723000077\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531043723000077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介目的:评估高流量鼻插管(HFNC)对急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)(非 COVID-19)、常规氧疗难治和/或不耐受无创通气(NIV)或持续气道正压(CPAP)且不符合重症监护病房(ICU)入院标准的老年患者的有效性和安全性:前瞻性观察研究:对接受高频核磁共振治疗的 ARF 患者进行前瞻性观察,这些患者在接受药物治疗和常规系统吸氧 24 小时后出现临床和动脉血气恶化。研究评估了呼吸困难程度、气体交换参数(动脉氧气压力/吸入氧气分数比(PaO2/FiO2);血氧饱和度/吸入氧气分数(Sp02/Fi02);ROX 指数)、患者耐受程度和死亡率。这些指标分别在急诊科(ED)出院时、常规吸氧治疗后 24 小时以及开始高频核磁共振治疗后 60 分钟、120 分钟和 24 小时进行了测量。结果:2019 年 11 月至 2020 年 11 月期间,200 名患者被纳入研究,平均年龄 83 岁,主要为女性(61.9%)、肥胖(体重指数(BMI)31.1)、高合并症(Charlson 指数 4)和轻中度依赖(Barthel 60)。128 名患者(64%)中有多人出现高碳酸血症。没有人出现呼吸性酸中毒(pH 值为 7.39)。在 60 分钟、120 分钟和 24 小时后进行的评估显示,与呼吸频率 (RR)、呼吸困难、ROX 指数、PaO2/FiO2、SpO2/FiO2 和患者舒适度等基线参数相比,所有患者和高碳酸血症患者亚群均有显著改善。未观察到 PaCO2 或意识水平发生变化。HFNC 的耐受性良好。十名患者(5%)因疾病进展导致 ARF 而死亡:对于非 COVID-19 引起的 ARF、常规氧疗无效和/或不能耐受 NIV 或 CPAP 且不符合入住 ICU 标准的老年患者,HFNC 是一种有效且安全的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula therapy in elderly patients with acute respiratory failure

Introduction

To assess the efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in elderly patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) not due to COVID-19, refractory to treatment with conventional oxygen therapy and/or intolerant to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and without criteria for admission to intensive care units (ICU).

Methods

Prospective observational study of patients with ARF treated with HFNC who presented clinical and arterial blood gas deterioration after 24 h of medical treatment and oxygenation by conventional systems. The degree of dyspnoea, gas exchange parameters (arterial O2 pressure/inspired O2 fraction ratio (PaO2/FiO2); oxygen saturation measured by oximetry/ inspired fraction of oxygen (Sp02/Fi02), ROX index), degree of patient tolerance and mortality were evaluated. These were measured at discharge from the emergency department (ED), 24 h after treatment with conventional oxygenation and 60, 120 min and 24 h after initiation of HFNC. The results were analyzed for all patients as a whole and for patients with hypercapnia (arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) < 45 mmHg) separately.

Results

200 patients were included in the study between November 2019 and November 2020, with a mean age of 83 years, predominantly women (61.9%), obese (Body Mass Index (BMI) 31.1), with high comorbidity (Charlson index 4) and mild-moderate degree of dependence (Barthel 60). A number of 128 patients (64%) were hypercapnic. None had respiratory acidosis (pH 7.39). Evaluation at 60 min, 120 min and 24 h showed significant improvement in all patients and in the subgroup of hypercapnic patients with respect to baseline parameters in respiratory rate (RR), dyspnoea, ROX index, PaO2/FiO2, SpO2/FiO2 and patient comfort. No changes in PaCO2 or level of consciousness were observed. HFNC was well tolerated. Ten patients (5%) died due to progression of the disease causing ARF.

Conclusions

HFNC is an effective and safe alternative in elderly patients with ARF not due to COVID-19, refractory to treatment with conventional oxygen therapy and/or intolerant to NIV or CPAP and without criteria for admission to ICU.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pulmonology
Pulmonology Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
159
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: Pulmonology (previously Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia) is the official journal of the Portuguese Society of Pulmonology (Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia/SPP). The journal publishes 6 issues per year and focuses on respiratory system diseases in adults and clinical research. It accepts various types of articles including peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, editorials, and opinion articles. The journal is published in English and is freely accessible through its website, as well as Medline and other databases. It is indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded, Journal of Citation Reports, Index Medicus/MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE/Excerpta Medica.
期刊最新文献
Performance of helmet CPAP using different configurations: Turbine-driven ventilators vs Venturi devices. Silicosis and tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Defective exercise-related expiratory muscle recruitment in patients with PHOX2B mutations: A clue to neural determinants of the congenital central hypoventilation syndrome. Benign ectopic intrapulmonary thyroid: Further proof of its existence. Prone position for acute respiratory distress syndrome and the hazards of meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1