弥散加权成像可用于腹膜液体检查吗?

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Polish Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5114/pjr.2023.126135
Zeynep Keskin
{"title":"弥散加权成像可用于腹膜液体检查吗?","authors":"Zeynep Keskin","doi":"10.5114/pjr.2023.126135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aetiology of free fluid detected in the abdomen can be investigated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of diffusion-weighted images (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the evaluation of abdominopelvic fluids.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients with abdominopelvic fluid detected on MRI of the lower abdomen were included in this retrospective, single-centre study. Paracentesis and fluid analysis was performed in these patients. The average ADC values in fluids were measured by a radiologist. A cut-off value was determined, and the specificity, sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive values (PPV) were calculated. Intra-observer agreement was investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study comprised 41 (33 female) patients, and their mean age was 48 ± 4.02 years. The ADC values in infective fluids were significantly higher than in non-infective fluids (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The cut-off value used was 2.95 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s. According to this threshold value, sensitivity in distinguishing non-infective from infective fluids was 88%, specificity was 93.8%, PPV was 95.7%, and NPV was 83.3%. Intra-observer agreement was strong in ADC values (κ = 0.699) (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We concluded that the ADC value is a non-invasive, reliable, reproducible imaging parameter that can be useful in the evaluation and characterization of abdominal fluids.</p>","PeriodicalId":47128,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9a/0a/PJR-88-50424.PMC10086605.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can diffusion-weighted imaging be used in the examination of peritoneal fluids?\",\"authors\":\"Zeynep Keskin\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/pjr.2023.126135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aetiology of free fluid detected in the abdomen can be investigated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of diffusion-weighted images (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the evaluation of abdominopelvic fluids.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients with abdominopelvic fluid detected on MRI of the lower abdomen were included in this retrospective, single-centre study. Paracentesis and fluid analysis was performed in these patients. The average ADC values in fluids were measured by a radiologist. A cut-off value was determined, and the specificity, sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive values (PPV) were calculated. Intra-observer agreement was investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study comprised 41 (33 female) patients, and their mean age was 48 ± 4.02 years. The ADC values in infective fluids were significantly higher than in non-infective fluids (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The cut-off value used was 2.95 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s. According to this threshold value, sensitivity in distinguishing non-infective from infective fluids was 88%, specificity was 93.8%, PPV was 95.7%, and NPV was 83.3%. Intra-observer agreement was strong in ADC values (κ = 0.699) (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We concluded that the ADC value is a non-invasive, reliable, reproducible imaging parameter that can be useful in the evaluation and characterization of abdominal fluids.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9a/0a/PJR-88-50424.PMC10086605.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2023.126135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2023.126135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:应用磁共振成像(MRI)技术探讨腹部游离液的病因。本研究的目的是探讨弥散加权图像(DWI)和表观弥散系数(ADC)值在评估腹腔积液中的有效性。材料和方法:本研究为单中心回顾性研究,研究对象为下腹部MRI检查发现有腹腔积液的患者。对这些患者进行了穿刺和液体分析。液体中的平均ADC值由放射科医生测量。确定截断值,计算特异性、敏感性、阴性预测值(NPV)和阳性预测值(PPV)。对观察员内部协议进行了调查。结果:共纳入41例患者,其中女性33例,平均年龄48±4.02岁。感染液中ADC值显著高于非感染液(p < 0.001)。使用的临界值为2.95 × 10-3 mm2/s。根据该阈值,区分非感染性和感染性液体的敏感性为88%,特异性为93.8%,PPV为95.7%,NPV为83.3%。ADC值的观察者间一致性很强(κ = 0.699) (p < 0.001)。结论:我们认为ADC值是非侵入性的、可靠的、可重复的成像参数,可用于评估和表征腹部液体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can diffusion-weighted imaging be used in the examination of peritoneal fluids?

Purpose: The aetiology of free fluid detected in the abdomen can be investigated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of diffusion-weighted images (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the evaluation of abdominopelvic fluids.

Material and methods: Patients with abdominopelvic fluid detected on MRI of the lower abdomen were included in this retrospective, single-centre study. Paracentesis and fluid analysis was performed in these patients. The average ADC values in fluids were measured by a radiologist. A cut-off value was determined, and the specificity, sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive values (PPV) were calculated. Intra-observer agreement was investigated.

Results: The study comprised 41 (33 female) patients, and their mean age was 48 ± 4.02 years. The ADC values in infective fluids were significantly higher than in non-infective fluids (p < 0.001). The cut-off value used was 2.95 × 10-3 mm2/s. According to this threshold value, sensitivity in distinguishing non-infective from infective fluids was 88%, specificity was 93.8%, PPV was 95.7%, and NPV was 83.3%. Intra-observer agreement was strong in ADC values (κ = 0.699) (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: We concluded that the ADC value is a non-invasive, reliable, reproducible imaging parameter that can be useful in the evaluation and characterization of abdominal fluids.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Radiology
Polish Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lung ultrasound in a nutshell. Lines, signs, some applications, and misconceptions from a radiologist's point of view. Ablation of pulmonary neoplasms: review of literature and future perspectives. Bone marrow lesions of the femoral head: can radiomics distinguish whether it is reversible? Summary of radiation dose management and optimization: comparison of radiation protection measures between Poland and other countries. Diagnosis and treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis - a comprehensive overview.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1