评估成年人群中是否存在与创伤相关的诊断阴影。

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-13 DOI:10.1037/tra0001484
Katherine E Wislocki, Alyson K Zalta
{"title":"评估成年人群中是否存在与创伤相关的诊断阴影。","authors":"Katherine E Wislocki, Alyson K Zalta","doi":"10.1037/tra0001484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Previous research with youth has shown that clinicians tend to diagnose and treat posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in trauma-exposed clients, even when clinical presentations indicate that PTSD is not the primary diagnosis. The current study sought to examine this trauma-related diagnostic overshadowing bias in adult cases across different types of trauma exposure.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Mental health professionals (<i>N</i> = 232) reviewed two vignettes describing an adult seeking treatment for either obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms or substance use disorder (SUD) symptoms (target disorders). Each participant was randomly assigned to one vignette in which one client endorsed exposure to trauma (i.e., sexual trauma or physical trauma) and one vignette in which the client reported no trauma exposure. Following each vignette, participants responded to questions related to the diagnosis and treatment of the client.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both cases, participants were significantly less likely to choose the target diagnosis and treatment and more likely to choose a PTSD diagnosis and trauma treatment when trauma exposure was present in the vignettes. Evidence for the bias was strongest for vignettes that contained sexual trauma compared to vignettes that contained physical trauma. Evidence for the bias was also more consistent in the OCD case compared to the SUD case.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results indicate evidence for the existence of trauma-related diagnostic overshadowing in adult populations, though the strength of this bias may be dependent on aspects of the trauma and overall clinical presentation. More work is needed to understand factors that may impact the presence of this bias. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":"1367-1373"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the existence of trauma-related diagnostic overshadowing in adult populations.\",\"authors\":\"Katherine E Wislocki, Alyson K Zalta\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/tra0001484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Previous research with youth has shown that clinicians tend to diagnose and treat posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in trauma-exposed clients, even when clinical presentations indicate that PTSD is not the primary diagnosis. The current study sought to examine this trauma-related diagnostic overshadowing bias in adult cases across different types of trauma exposure.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Mental health professionals (<i>N</i> = 232) reviewed two vignettes describing an adult seeking treatment for either obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms or substance use disorder (SUD) symptoms (target disorders). Each participant was randomly assigned to one vignette in which one client endorsed exposure to trauma (i.e., sexual trauma or physical trauma) and one vignette in which the client reported no trauma exposure. Following each vignette, participants responded to questions related to the diagnosis and treatment of the client.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both cases, participants were significantly less likely to choose the target diagnosis and treatment and more likely to choose a PTSD diagnosis and trauma treatment when trauma exposure was present in the vignettes. Evidence for the bias was strongest for vignettes that contained sexual trauma compared to vignettes that contained physical trauma. Evidence for the bias was also more consistent in the OCD case compared to the SUD case.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results indicate evidence for the existence of trauma-related diagnostic overshadowing in adult populations, though the strength of this bias may be dependent on aspects of the trauma and overall clinical presentation. More work is needed to understand factors that may impact the presence of this bias. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1367-1373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001484\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001484","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:以往针对青少年的研究表明,即使临床表现显示创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)并非主要诊断,临床医生也倾向于诊断和治疗有创伤暴露的客户。本研究试图在不同类型的创伤暴露的成人病例中检验这种与创伤相关的诊断遮蔽偏差:心理健康专业人员(N = 232)审查了两个小故事,描述了一名成年人因强迫症(OCD)症状或药物使用障碍(SUD)症状(目标障碍)而寻求治疗的情况。每位参与者被随机分配到一个小故事和一个小故事中,在前者中,一名客户表示自己受到了创伤(即性创伤或身体创伤),而在后者中,客户表示自己没有受到创伤。每个小故事结束后,参与者回答与客户诊断和治疗相关的问题:结果:在这两种情况下,如果小故事中出现创伤暴露,参与者选择目标诊断和治疗方法的可能性明显较低,而选择创伤后应激障碍诊断和创伤治疗方法的可能性较高。与包含身体创伤的小故事相比,包含性创伤的小故事的偏差证据最为充分。与 SUD 案例相比,强迫症案例中的偏差证据也更为一致:研究结果表明,有证据表明在成年人群中存在与创伤相关的诊断阴影,尽管这种偏倚的强度可能取决于创伤的各个方面和整体临床表现。我们还需要做更多的工作来了解可能影响这种偏差存在的因素。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the existence of trauma-related diagnostic overshadowing in adult populations.

Objective: Previous research with youth has shown that clinicians tend to diagnose and treat posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in trauma-exposed clients, even when clinical presentations indicate that PTSD is not the primary diagnosis. The current study sought to examine this trauma-related diagnostic overshadowing bias in adult cases across different types of trauma exposure.

Method: Mental health professionals (N = 232) reviewed two vignettes describing an adult seeking treatment for either obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms or substance use disorder (SUD) symptoms (target disorders). Each participant was randomly assigned to one vignette in which one client endorsed exposure to trauma (i.e., sexual trauma or physical trauma) and one vignette in which the client reported no trauma exposure. Following each vignette, participants responded to questions related to the diagnosis and treatment of the client.

Results: In both cases, participants were significantly less likely to choose the target diagnosis and treatment and more likely to choose a PTSD diagnosis and trauma treatment when trauma exposure was present in the vignettes. Evidence for the bias was strongest for vignettes that contained sexual trauma compared to vignettes that contained physical trauma. Evidence for the bias was also more consistent in the OCD case compared to the SUD case.

Conclusions: Results indicate evidence for the existence of trauma-related diagnostic overshadowing in adult populations, though the strength of this bias may be dependent on aspects of the trauma and overall clinical presentation. More work is needed to understand factors that may impact the presence of this bias. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
期刊最新文献
Exploring the role of technology in youth and adolescent deaths by suicide using data from the 2017-2019 National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS). Military sexual trauma, childhood trauma, and combat trauma: Associations with longitudinal posttraumatic growth among U.S. Veterans. Prospective study of individual characteristics and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms following childbirth: Birth satisfaction as a moderator. Assessing similarities and differences in thematic content across online mental health communities dedicated to trauma-related mental health conditions. Consuming hurricane-related media: The protective role of perceived trust.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1