从老鼠到大象的代谢曲线:历史概述。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY Comprehensive Physiology Pub Date : 2023-03-30 DOI:10.1002/cphy.c220003
Jacopo P Mortola
{"title":"从老鼠到大象的代谢曲线:历史概述。","authors":"Jacopo P Mortola","doi":"10.1002/cphy.c220003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although it is intuitive that large mammals need more food than smaller ones, it is not so obvious that, relative to their body mass, larger mammals consume less than smaller ones. In fact, on a per kg basis, the resting metabolic rate of a mouse is some 50 times higher than that of an elephant. The fact that metabolism could not be proportional to the mass of the animal was suggested by Sarrus and Rameaux in 1838. The first indication that oxygen consumption (or other indices of metabolic rate, Y) related to the animal body mass (M) according to an exponential of the type Y = a · M<sup>b</sup> , where b was about 0.75, was presented by Max Kleiber in 1932. Two years later Samuel Brody had collected sufficient data to construct the first \"mouse-to-elephant\" metabolic curve. The physiological basis of the relationship has been the object of many hypotheses, often accompanied by a great deal of controversy. This historical essay traces the origin of the mouse-to-elephant metabolic function, recalling the earliest concepts of metabolism and its measurements to understand the body size dependency, which is still one of the most elusive phenomena in comparative physiology. A brief look at the metabolic scaling of nonmammalian organisms will be included to frame the mouse-to-elephant curve into a broader context and to introduce some interesting interpretations of the mammalian function. © 2023 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 13:4513-4558, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":10573,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Mouse-To-Elephant Metabolic Curve: Historical Overview.\",\"authors\":\"Jacopo P Mortola\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cphy.c220003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although it is intuitive that large mammals need more food than smaller ones, it is not so obvious that, relative to their body mass, larger mammals consume less than smaller ones. In fact, on a per kg basis, the resting metabolic rate of a mouse is some 50 times higher than that of an elephant. The fact that metabolism could not be proportional to the mass of the animal was suggested by Sarrus and Rameaux in 1838. The first indication that oxygen consumption (or other indices of metabolic rate, Y) related to the animal body mass (M) according to an exponential of the type Y = a · M<sup>b</sup> , where b was about 0.75, was presented by Max Kleiber in 1932. Two years later Samuel Brody had collected sufficient data to construct the first \\\"mouse-to-elephant\\\" metabolic curve. The physiological basis of the relationship has been the object of many hypotheses, often accompanied by a great deal of controversy. This historical essay traces the origin of the mouse-to-elephant metabolic function, recalling the earliest concepts of metabolism and its measurements to understand the body size dependency, which is still one of the most elusive phenomena in comparative physiology. A brief look at the metabolic scaling of nonmammalian organisms will be included to frame the mouse-to-elephant curve into a broader context and to introduce some interesting interpretations of the mammalian function. © 2023 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 13:4513-4558, 2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comprehensive Physiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comprehensive Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c220003\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c220003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

虽然人们直觉上认为大型哺乳动物比小型哺乳动物需要更多的食物,但相对于它们的体重,大型哺乳动物比小型哺乳动物消耗的食物少这一点并不明显。事实上,以每公斤为基础,老鼠的静息代谢率是大象的50倍左右。Sarrus和Rameaux在1838年提出了新陈代谢不能与动物的质量成正比的事实。Max Kleiber于1932年首次提出了耗氧量(或其他代谢率指标Y)与动物体重(M)的关系,其指数形式为Y = a·Mb,其中b约为0.75。两年后,塞缪尔·布罗迪收集了足够的数据,构建了第一个“从老鼠到大象”的代谢曲线。这种关系的生理基础一直是许多假设的对象,往往伴随着大量的争议。这篇历史性的文章追溯了老鼠到大象的代谢功能的起源,回顾了最早的代谢概念及其测量,以理解体型依赖性,这仍然是比较生理学中最难以捉摸的现象之一。我们将简要介绍非哺乳动物有机体的代谢缩放,以便在更广泛的背景下构建从老鼠到大象的曲线,并介绍一些关于哺乳动物功能的有趣解释。©2023美国生理学会。物理学报(自然科学版),2023。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Mouse-To-Elephant Metabolic Curve: Historical Overview.

Although it is intuitive that large mammals need more food than smaller ones, it is not so obvious that, relative to their body mass, larger mammals consume less than smaller ones. In fact, on a per kg basis, the resting metabolic rate of a mouse is some 50 times higher than that of an elephant. The fact that metabolism could not be proportional to the mass of the animal was suggested by Sarrus and Rameaux in 1838. The first indication that oxygen consumption (or other indices of metabolic rate, Y) related to the animal body mass (M) according to an exponential of the type Y = a · Mb , where b was about 0.75, was presented by Max Kleiber in 1932. Two years later Samuel Brody had collected sufficient data to construct the first "mouse-to-elephant" metabolic curve. The physiological basis of the relationship has been the object of many hypotheses, often accompanied by a great deal of controversy. This historical essay traces the origin of the mouse-to-elephant metabolic function, recalling the earliest concepts of metabolism and its measurements to understand the body size dependency, which is still one of the most elusive phenomena in comparative physiology. A brief look at the metabolic scaling of nonmammalian organisms will be included to frame the mouse-to-elephant curve into a broader context and to introduce some interesting interpretations of the mammalian function. © 2023 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 13:4513-4558, 2023.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Comprehensive Physiology is the most authoritative and comprehensive collection of physiology information ever assembled, and uses the most powerful features of review journals and electronic reference works to cover the latest key developments in the field, through the most authoritative articles on the subjects covered. This makes Comprehensive Physiology a valued reference work on the evolving science of physiology for both researchers and clinicians. It also provides a useful teaching tool for instructors and an informative resource for medical students and other students in the life and health sciences.
期刊最新文献
Maternal Microvascular Dysfunction During and After Preeclamptic Pregnancy. Mitochondrial Function and Dysfunction in White Adipocytes and Therapeutic Implications. Neuromuscular Transmission in a Biological Context. Function and Regulation of Bone Marrow Adipose Tissue in Health and Disease: State of the Field and Clinical Considerations. Human Gut Microbiota in Cardiovascular Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1