Thomas R Müller, Kathleen Haack, Hans Jörgen Grabe, Ekkehardt Kumbier
{"title":"[《Deine Gesundheit》杂志-民主德国社会精神病学的反思?]","authors":"Thomas R Müller, Kathleen Haack, Hans Jörgen Grabe, Ekkehardt Kumbier","doi":"10.1055/a-2019-6399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Articles on psychiatric care in the GDR published in the journal \"Deine Gesundheit\" are identified. This involved examining how psychiatry was presented to the public and the intentions of addressing a lay audience.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>All booklets published between 1955 and 1989 were systematically reviewed, the role of the publishers examined, and an assessment made in the context of social psychiatry and sociopolitical conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a lively publication activity of psychiatric topics by mainly professional actors. The temporal accumulation in the context of psychiatric reform efforts is striking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reform-oriented psychiatrists in particular used the popular science medium to reach a broad public and thus greater social acceptance of community psychiatric care concepts.</p>","PeriodicalId":20711,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrische Praxis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The Journal \\\"Deine Gesundheit\\\" - A Reflection of Social Psychiatry in the GDR?]\",\"authors\":\"Thomas R Müller, Kathleen Haack, Hans Jörgen Grabe, Ekkehardt Kumbier\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2019-6399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Articles on psychiatric care in the GDR published in the journal \\\"Deine Gesundheit\\\" are identified. This involved examining how psychiatry was presented to the public and the intentions of addressing a lay audience.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>All booklets published between 1955 and 1989 were systematically reviewed, the role of the publishers examined, and an assessment made in the context of social psychiatry and sociopolitical conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a lively publication activity of psychiatric topics by mainly professional actors. The temporal accumulation in the context of psychiatric reform efforts is striking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reform-oriented psychiatrists in particular used the popular science medium to reach a broad public and thus greater social acceptance of community psychiatric care concepts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatrische Praxis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatrische Praxis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2019-6399\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrische Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2019-6399","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
[The Journal "Deine Gesundheit" - A Reflection of Social Psychiatry in the GDR?]
Background: Articles on psychiatric care in the GDR published in the journal "Deine Gesundheit" are identified. This involved examining how psychiatry was presented to the public and the intentions of addressing a lay audience.
Methodology: All booklets published between 1955 and 1989 were systematically reviewed, the role of the publishers examined, and an assessment made in the context of social psychiatry and sociopolitical conditions.
Results: There was a lively publication activity of psychiatric topics by mainly professional actors. The temporal accumulation in the context of psychiatric reform efforts is striking.
Conclusions: Reform-oriented psychiatrists in particular used the popular science medium to reach a broad public and thus greater social acceptance of community psychiatric care concepts.