中国天津奥密克戎疫情期间,更糟糕的心理特征与更高的情绪问题概率相关

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY European Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejpsy.2022.09.002
Doudou Zheng , Ping Liu , Hanhui Chen , Xinxu Wang , Jie Li
{"title":"中国天津奥密克戎疫情期间,更糟糕的心理特征与更高的情绪问题概率相关","authors":"Doudou Zheng ,&nbsp;Ping Liu ,&nbsp;Hanhui Chen ,&nbsp;Xinxu Wang ,&nbsp;Jie Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ejpsy.2022.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objectives</h3><p>Individuals with specific psychological weaknesses are prone to mental problems during the coronavirus pandemic. This self-rating study assessed the combined effects of infection-related stress, resilience, worry, and loneliness on the likelihood of depression and anxiety among infected and non-infected individuals during the Tianjin Pandemic in 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Individuals infected with Omicron (<em>n</em> = 249) and health residents (<em>n</em> = 415) were recruited from two hospitals and communities in Tianjin. Each respondent completed the following on-site assessment: Self-developed Scale of Demographics, Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), De Jong Gierveld Scale (DJGLS), and the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ). The respondents were categorized into depression or non-depression group by SDS scores, and anxiety or non-anxiety group by SAS scores.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The overall scores of CD-RISC, DJGJLS, and PSWQ were significantly different both between the depression group and non-depression groups and between the anxiety group and non-anxiety groups. The greater likelihood of depression was associated with lower overall scores of CD-RISC and higher scores of PSWQ; the greater likelihood of anxiety was associated with higher scores of PSWQ. The likelihood of depression was also positively associated with having infection-related stress and three demographics.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This on-site study demonstrates the importance of specific traits in a small-scale pandemic: the worse resilience and the greater worry propensity related to the higher probability of depression, and the greater propensity of worry related to the higher probability of anxiety. Moreover, those experiencing infection-related stress, being male, living alone, and being unemployed are more likely to have depressive problems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9829520/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Worse psychological traits associated with higher probability of emotional problems during the Omicron pandemic in Tianjin, China\",\"authors\":\"Doudou Zheng ,&nbsp;Ping Liu ,&nbsp;Hanhui Chen ,&nbsp;Xinxu Wang ,&nbsp;Jie Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejpsy.2022.09.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Objectives</h3><p>Individuals with specific psychological weaknesses are prone to mental problems during the coronavirus pandemic. This self-rating study assessed the combined effects of infection-related stress, resilience, worry, and loneliness on the likelihood of depression and anxiety among infected and non-infected individuals during the Tianjin Pandemic in 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Individuals infected with Omicron (<em>n</em> = 249) and health residents (<em>n</em> = 415) were recruited from two hospitals and communities in Tianjin. Each respondent completed the following on-site assessment: Self-developed Scale of Demographics, Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), De Jong Gierveld Scale (DJGLS), and the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ). The respondents were categorized into depression or non-depression group by SDS scores, and anxiety or non-anxiety group by SAS scores.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The overall scores of CD-RISC, DJGJLS, and PSWQ were significantly different both between the depression group and non-depression groups and between the anxiety group and non-anxiety groups. The greater likelihood of depression was associated with lower overall scores of CD-RISC and higher scores of PSWQ; the greater likelihood of anxiety was associated with higher scores of PSWQ. The likelihood of depression was also positively associated with having infection-related stress and three demographics.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This on-site study demonstrates the importance of specific traits in a small-scale pandemic: the worse resilience and the greater worry propensity related to the higher probability of depression, and the greater propensity of worry related to the higher probability of anxiety. Moreover, those experiencing infection-related stress, being male, living alone, and being unemployed are more likely to have depressive problems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9829520/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213616322000775\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213616322000775","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景和目的在冠状病毒大流行期间,有特定心理弱点的人容易出现心理问题。本自评研究评估了2022年天津疫情期间感染相关压力、韧性、担忧和孤独感对感染者和未感染者抑郁和焦虑可能性的综合影响。方法从天津市两家医院和社区招募奥密克戎感染者(n=249)和健康居民(n=415)。每位受访者完成了以下现场评估:自编人口学量表、Zung抑郁自评量表(SDS)、Zung焦虑自评量量表(SAS)、Connor Davidson弹性量表(CD-RISC)、De Jong Gierveld量表(DJGLS)和宾夕法尼亚州立大学担忧问卷(PSWQ)。根据SDS评分将被调查者分为抑郁组或非抑郁组,根据SAS评分将其分为焦虑组或非焦虑组。结果抑郁组和非抑郁组、焦虑组和非焦虑组的CD-RISC、DJGJLS和PSWQ总分均有显著差异。抑郁的可能性越大,CD-RISC总分越低,PSWQ评分越高;焦虑的可能性越大,PSWQ得分越高。抑郁症的可能性也与感染相关的压力和三种人口统计学呈正相关。结论这项现场研究证明了特定特征在小规模疫情中的重要性:韧性越差、担忧倾向越大,患抑郁症的概率越高,而担忧倾向越强,患焦虑症的概率越大。此外,那些经历感染相关压力、男性、独居和失业的人更有可能出现抑郁问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Worse psychological traits associated with higher probability of emotional problems during the Omicron pandemic in Tianjin, China

Background and Objectives

Individuals with specific psychological weaknesses are prone to mental problems during the coronavirus pandemic. This self-rating study assessed the combined effects of infection-related stress, resilience, worry, and loneliness on the likelihood of depression and anxiety among infected and non-infected individuals during the Tianjin Pandemic in 2022.

Methods

Individuals infected with Omicron (n = 249) and health residents (n = 415) were recruited from two hospitals and communities in Tianjin. Each respondent completed the following on-site assessment: Self-developed Scale of Demographics, Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), De Jong Gierveld Scale (DJGLS), and the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ). The respondents were categorized into depression or non-depression group by SDS scores, and anxiety or non-anxiety group by SAS scores.

Results

The overall scores of CD-RISC, DJGJLS, and PSWQ were significantly different both between the depression group and non-depression groups and between the anxiety group and non-anxiety groups. The greater likelihood of depression was associated with lower overall scores of CD-RISC and higher scores of PSWQ; the greater likelihood of anxiety was associated with higher scores of PSWQ. The likelihood of depression was also positively associated with having infection-related stress and three demographics.

Conclusions

This on-site study demonstrates the importance of specific traits in a small-scale pandemic: the worse resilience and the greater worry propensity related to the higher probability of depression, and the greater propensity of worry related to the higher probability of anxiety. Moreover, those experiencing infection-related stress, being male, living alone, and being unemployed are more likely to have depressive problems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: The European journal of psychiatry is a quarterly publication founded in 1986 and directed by Professor Seva until his death in 2004. It was originally intended to report “the scientific activity of European psychiatrists” and “to bring about a greater degree of communication” among them. However, “since scientific knowledge has no geographical or cultural boundaries, is open to contributions from all over the world”. These principles are maintained in the new stage of the journal, now expanded with the help of an American editor.
期刊最新文献
Psychopathological and cardiometabolic efficacy of a nutritional education intervention based on symbiotics in schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Two-arm Randomised Clinical Trial Is it possible to circumnavigate the APIcalypse? On challenges to study mental health in the age of digitalization and AI An expert Delphi consensus for the characteristics of an ideal clozapine-specific side effect scale Psychotherapy training in psychiatry residencies: A review of trainees’ perspectives Exploring direct experience as a core element behind mindfulness-based cognitive therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1