暴露趾骨的拇指指尖缺损治疗方法比较:改良异趾骨神经血管岛瓣与游离大趾外侧瓣

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.12.007
Yang Wang, Qiaochu Zhang, Jiaxiang Gu, Chaoqun Yuan, Hongjun Liu
{"title":"暴露趾骨的拇指指尖缺损治疗方法比较:改良异趾骨神经血管岛瓣与游离大趾外侧瓣","authors":"Yang Wang, Qiaochu Zhang, Jiaxiang Gu, Chaoqun Yuan, Hongjun Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Modified heterodigital neurovascular island flaps and free lateral great toe flaps are dependable methods for treating thumb-tip defects with phalangeal bone exposure. We retrospectively analyzed and compared the details and results of the two methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 25 patients with thumb injuries with phalangeal bone exposure treated between 2018 and 2021. Patients were categorized as per the following surgical methods: (1) modified heterodigital neurovascular island flap (12 patients, finger flap group) and (2) free lateral great toe flap (13 patients, toe flap group). The Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire, aesthetic appearance, Vancouver Scar Scale, Cold Intolerance Severity Score, static 2-point discrimination, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament, and range of motion of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the injured thumb were evaluated and compared. In addition, operation time, hospital stay, return-to-work time, and complications were recorded and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both groups, the defect was successfully repaired, with no cases of complete necrosis. The 2 groups had similar mean scores in static 2-point discrimination, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament, range of motion, and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire scores. The aesthetic appearance, scarring, and cold tolerance of the toe flap group were better than the finger flap group. The operation time, hospital stay, and return-to-work time in the finger flap group were shorter than the toe flap group. The finger flap group had 2 complications-a superficial infection and 1 case of partial flap necrosis. The toe flap group had 3 complications-a superficial infection, 1 case each of partial flap necrosis, and partial skin graft loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both treatments can achieve satisfactory results; however, they each have advantages and disadvantages.</p><p><strong>Type of study/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Treatment Methods of Thumb-Tip Defects With Phalangeal Bone Exposure: Modified Heterodigital Neurovascular Island Flap Versus Free Lateral Great Toe Flap.\",\"authors\":\"Yang Wang, Qiaochu Zhang, Jiaxiang Gu, Chaoqun Yuan, Hongjun Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.12.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Modified heterodigital neurovascular island flaps and free lateral great toe flaps are dependable methods for treating thumb-tip defects with phalangeal bone exposure. We retrospectively analyzed and compared the details and results of the two methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 25 patients with thumb injuries with phalangeal bone exposure treated between 2018 and 2021. Patients were categorized as per the following surgical methods: (1) modified heterodigital neurovascular island flap (12 patients, finger flap group) and (2) free lateral great toe flap (13 patients, toe flap group). The Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire, aesthetic appearance, Vancouver Scar Scale, Cold Intolerance Severity Score, static 2-point discrimination, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament, and range of motion of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the injured thumb were evaluated and compared. In addition, operation time, hospital stay, return-to-work time, and complications were recorded and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both groups, the defect was successfully repaired, with no cases of complete necrosis. The 2 groups had similar mean scores in static 2-point discrimination, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament, range of motion, and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire scores. The aesthetic appearance, scarring, and cold tolerance of the toe flap group were better than the finger flap group. The operation time, hospital stay, and return-to-work time in the finger flap group were shorter than the toe flap group. The finger flap group had 2 complications-a superficial infection and 1 case of partial flap necrosis. The toe flap group had 3 complications-a superficial infection, 1 case each of partial flap necrosis, and partial skin graft loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both treatments can achieve satisfactory results; however, they each have advantages and disadvantages.</p><p><strong>Type of study/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.12.007\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/2/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.12.007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:改良异趾骨神经血管岛皮瓣和游离大趾外侧皮瓣是治疗拇指指骨缺损的可靠方法。我们对这两种方法的细节和效果进行了回顾性分析和比较:这项回顾性研究纳入了2018年至2021年间接受治疗的25例拇指指骨外露损伤患者。患者按以下手术方法分类:(1)改良异趾骨神经血管岛皮瓣(12 例患者,指皮瓣组);(2)游离大趾外侧皮瓣(13 例患者,趾皮瓣组)。对密歇根手部结果问卷、美学外观、温哥华疤痕评分、冷不耐受严重程度评分、静态 2 点辨别力、Semmes-Weinstein 单丝和受伤拇指掌指关节的活动范围进行了评估和比较。此外,还记录并比较了手术时间、住院时间、恢复工作时间和并发症:结果:两组患者均成功修复了缺损,无一例完全坏死。两组患者在静态2点辨别力、Semmes-Weinstein单丝、活动范围和密歇根手部结果问卷评分方面的平均得分相似。脚趾皮瓣组的外观、瘢痕和耐寒性优于手指皮瓣组。指皮瓣组的手术时间、住院时间和恢复工作时间均短于趾皮瓣组。指皮瓣组有 2 例并发症--表皮感染和 1 例皮瓣部分坏死。脚趾皮瓣组有3例并发症--表皮感染、部分皮瓣坏死和部分植皮脱落各1例:结论:两种治疗方法都能达到令人满意的效果,但各有利弊:治疗 IV.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Treatment Methods of Thumb-Tip Defects With Phalangeal Bone Exposure: Modified Heterodigital Neurovascular Island Flap Versus Free Lateral Great Toe Flap.

Purpose: Modified heterodigital neurovascular island flaps and free lateral great toe flaps are dependable methods for treating thumb-tip defects with phalangeal bone exposure. We retrospectively analyzed and compared the details and results of the two methods.

Methods: This retrospective study included 25 patients with thumb injuries with phalangeal bone exposure treated between 2018 and 2021. Patients were categorized as per the following surgical methods: (1) modified heterodigital neurovascular island flap (12 patients, finger flap group) and (2) free lateral great toe flap (13 patients, toe flap group). The Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire, aesthetic appearance, Vancouver Scar Scale, Cold Intolerance Severity Score, static 2-point discrimination, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament, and range of motion of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the injured thumb were evaluated and compared. In addition, operation time, hospital stay, return-to-work time, and complications were recorded and compared.

Results: In both groups, the defect was successfully repaired, with no cases of complete necrosis. The 2 groups had similar mean scores in static 2-point discrimination, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament, range of motion, and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire scores. The aesthetic appearance, scarring, and cold tolerance of the toe flap group were better than the finger flap group. The operation time, hospital stay, and return-to-work time in the finger flap group were shorter than the toe flap group. The finger flap group had 2 complications-a superficial infection and 1 case of partial flap necrosis. The toe flap group had 3 complications-a superficial infection, 1 case each of partial flap necrosis, and partial skin graft loss.

Conclusion: Both treatments can achieve satisfactory results; however, they each have advantages and disadvantages.

Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
A Percutaneous Triple K-Wire Fixation Technique for Nascent Malunion of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fracture-Dislocation: A Case Series With an Assessment of Functional Outcome. Current Concepts in Diagnosis and Management of Hand Infections. Mid-Term Outcomes Following Trapeziectomy With Suture Suspensionplasty for Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis. Passive Mobilization With Place-and-Hold Versus Active Mobilization Therapy After Flexor Tendon Repair: 5-Year Minimum Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial. The Learning Curves of Adelaide- and Gan-Modified Lim-Tsai Flexor Tendon Repair Techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1