在产β-内酰胺酶的肠杆菌科分离菌群中检测β-内酰胺酶的表型试验性能

IF 0.9 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Laboratory Physicians Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1760399
Vindya Perera, Nelun de Silva, Kushlani Jayatilleke, Sara de Silva, Enoka Corea
{"title":"在产β-内酰胺酶的肠杆菌科分离菌群中检测β-内酰胺酶的表型试验性能","authors":"Vindya Perera,&nbsp;Nelun de Silva,&nbsp;Kushlani Jayatilleke,&nbsp;Sara de Silva,&nbsp;Enoka Corea","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1760399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives</b>  This study aimed to evaluate the performance of routinely used phenotypic tests to detect β-lactamase production in isolates coproducing multiple β-lactamase types. <b>Methods</b>  Commonly used phenotypic tests for the detection of extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL), AmpC β-lactamase, and carbapenemases were compared with detection and sequencing of β-lactamase genes (as the reference test) in 176 uropathogenic <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> coproducing multiple β-lactamases from two hospitals in the Western Province of Sri Lanka. <b>Results</b>  Majority of the isolates (147/176, 83.5%) carried β-lactamase genes with (90/147, 61%) harboring multiple genes. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute screening method using cefotaxime (sensitivity [Se], 97; specificity [Sp], 93; accuracy [Ac], 94) and ceftriaxone (Se, 97; Sp, 91; Ac, 93) was the most effective to detect ESBLs. The modified double disc synergy test (Se, 98; Sp, 98; Ac, 97) and combined disc test (Se, 94; Sp, 98; Ac, 96) showed good specificity for confirmation of ESBLs. Cefoxitin resistance (Se, 97; Sp, 73; Ac, 85) and the AmpC disc test (Se, 96; Sp, 82; Ac, 86) were sensitive to detect AmpC β-lactamase producers coproducing other β-lactamases but showed low specificity, probably due to coproduction of carbapenemases. Meropenem was useful to screen for New Delhi metallo β-lactamases and OXA-48-like carbapenemases (Se, 97; Sp, 96; Ac, 96). The modified carbapenem inactivation method showed excellent performance (Se, 97; Sp, 98; Ac, 97) in identifying production of both types of carbapenemases and was able to distinguish this from carbapenem resistance due to potential mutations in the porin gene. <b>Conclusion</b>  Microbiology laboratories that are still depend on phenotypic tests should utilize tests that are compatible with the types of β-lactamase prevalent in the region and those that are least affected by coexisting resistance mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":16149,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laboratory Physicians","volume":"15 1","pages":"117-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2a/17/10-1055-s-0042-1760399.PMC10104725.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of Phenotypic Tests to Detect β-Lactamases in a Population of β-Lactamase Coproducing <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> Isolates.\",\"authors\":\"Vindya Perera,&nbsp;Nelun de Silva,&nbsp;Kushlani Jayatilleke,&nbsp;Sara de Silva,&nbsp;Enoka Corea\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1760399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives</b>  This study aimed to evaluate the performance of routinely used phenotypic tests to detect β-lactamase production in isolates coproducing multiple β-lactamase types. <b>Methods</b>  Commonly used phenotypic tests for the detection of extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL), AmpC β-lactamase, and carbapenemases were compared with detection and sequencing of β-lactamase genes (as the reference test) in 176 uropathogenic <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> coproducing multiple β-lactamases from two hospitals in the Western Province of Sri Lanka. <b>Results</b>  Majority of the isolates (147/176, 83.5%) carried β-lactamase genes with (90/147, 61%) harboring multiple genes. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute screening method using cefotaxime (sensitivity [Se], 97; specificity [Sp], 93; accuracy [Ac], 94) and ceftriaxone (Se, 97; Sp, 91; Ac, 93) was the most effective to detect ESBLs. The modified double disc synergy test (Se, 98; Sp, 98; Ac, 97) and combined disc test (Se, 94; Sp, 98; Ac, 96) showed good specificity for confirmation of ESBLs. Cefoxitin resistance (Se, 97; Sp, 73; Ac, 85) and the AmpC disc test (Se, 96; Sp, 82; Ac, 86) were sensitive to detect AmpC β-lactamase producers coproducing other β-lactamases but showed low specificity, probably due to coproduction of carbapenemases. Meropenem was useful to screen for New Delhi metallo β-lactamases and OXA-48-like carbapenemases (Se, 97; Sp, 96; Ac, 96). The modified carbapenem inactivation method showed excellent performance (Se, 97; Sp, 98; Ac, 97) in identifying production of both types of carbapenemases and was able to distinguish this from carbapenem resistance due to potential mutations in the porin gene. <b>Conclusion</b>  Microbiology laboratories that are still depend on phenotypic tests should utilize tests that are compatible with the types of β-lactamase prevalent in the region and those that are least affected by coexisting resistance mechanisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Laboratory Physicians\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"117-125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2a/17/10-1055-s-0042-1760399.PMC10104725.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Laboratory Physicians\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1760399\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laboratory Physicians","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1760399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估常规表型检测在共产多种β-内酰胺酶的分离株中β-内酰胺酶产量的性能。方法将斯里兰卡西部省两家医院共产多种β-内酰胺酶的176株尿路致病性肠杆菌科细菌中常用的扩展谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)、AmpC β-内酰胺酶和碳青霉烯酶的表型检测方法与β-内酰胺酶基因检测和测序(作为参考)进行比较。结果大部分菌株(147/176,83.5%)携带β-内酰胺酶基因,多数菌株(90/147,61%)携带多基因。临床与实验室标准协会筛选头孢噻肟的方法(敏感性[Se], 97;特异性[Sp], 93;准确度[Ac], 94)和头孢曲松(Se, 97;Sp, 91;Ac, 93)是检测ESBLs最有效的方法。改进双盘协同检验(Se, 98;Sp, 98;Ac, 97)和联合圆盘试验(Se, 94;Sp, 98;Ac, 96)对ESBLs的确认具有良好的特异性。头孢西丁耐药(Se, 97;Sp, 73;Ac, 85)和AmpC盘测试(Se, 96;Sp, 82;Ac, 86)对AmpC β-内酰胺酶产生者与其他β-内酰胺酶共同产生敏感,但特异性较低,可能与碳青霉烯酶共同产生有关。美罗培南可用于筛选新德里金属β-内酰胺酶和oxa -48样碳青霉烯酶(Se, 97;Sp, 96;交流,96)。改进的碳青霉烯类失活方法表现出优良的性能(Se, 97;Sp, 98;Ac, 97)鉴定了两种碳青霉烯酶的产生,并能够将其与由于孔蛋白基因潜在突变引起的碳青霉烯抗性区分开来。结论仍依赖表型检测的微生物实验室应采用与该地区流行的β-内酰胺酶类型相适应的检测方法,以及受共存耐药机制影响最小的检测方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance of Phenotypic Tests to Detect β-Lactamases in a Population of β-Lactamase Coproducing Enterobacteriaceae Isolates.

Objectives  This study aimed to evaluate the performance of routinely used phenotypic tests to detect β-lactamase production in isolates coproducing multiple β-lactamase types. Methods  Commonly used phenotypic tests for the detection of extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL), AmpC β-lactamase, and carbapenemases were compared with detection and sequencing of β-lactamase genes (as the reference test) in 176 uropathogenic Enterobacteriaceae coproducing multiple β-lactamases from two hospitals in the Western Province of Sri Lanka. Results  Majority of the isolates (147/176, 83.5%) carried β-lactamase genes with (90/147, 61%) harboring multiple genes. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute screening method using cefotaxime (sensitivity [Se], 97; specificity [Sp], 93; accuracy [Ac], 94) and ceftriaxone (Se, 97; Sp, 91; Ac, 93) was the most effective to detect ESBLs. The modified double disc synergy test (Se, 98; Sp, 98; Ac, 97) and combined disc test (Se, 94; Sp, 98; Ac, 96) showed good specificity for confirmation of ESBLs. Cefoxitin resistance (Se, 97; Sp, 73; Ac, 85) and the AmpC disc test (Se, 96; Sp, 82; Ac, 86) were sensitive to detect AmpC β-lactamase producers coproducing other β-lactamases but showed low specificity, probably due to coproduction of carbapenemases. Meropenem was useful to screen for New Delhi metallo β-lactamases and OXA-48-like carbapenemases (Se, 97; Sp, 96; Ac, 96). The modified carbapenem inactivation method showed excellent performance (Se, 97; Sp, 98; Ac, 97) in identifying production of both types of carbapenemases and was able to distinguish this from carbapenem resistance due to potential mutations in the porin gene. Conclusion  Microbiology laboratories that are still depend on phenotypic tests should utilize tests that are compatible with the types of β-lactamase prevalent in the region and those that are least affected by coexisting resistance mechanisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Laboratory Physicians
Journal of Laboratory Physicians MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊最新文献
Short term antibiotic effects on gut microbiome in Indian preschoolers: A 16S rRNA analysis Burkholderia vietnamiensis Causing Bacteremia in Patients Suffering from B-Cell Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Case Series and Review of Literature Predicting Outcome in Organophosphorus Poisoning Using RBC Cholinesterase and Serum Cholinesterase Values: A Hospital-based Longitudinal Study Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Critical Result Notification Protocol of Biochemistry Laboratory at a Tertiary Care Hospital In response to the article; “Salivary IgA as a Surrogate Biomarker for Microbial Infections in Postoperative Patients Receiving Chemo-Radio-Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer. J Lab Physicians. 2023;15(2):264-268”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1