活动性感染性心内膜炎二尖瓣修复术的手术时机和可行性。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2023-02-20 Epub Date: 2022-11-03 DOI:10.5761/atcs.oa.22-00135
Tadashi Omoto, Atsushi Aoki, Kazuto Maruta, Tomoaki Masuda
{"title":"活动性感染性心内膜炎二尖瓣修复术的手术时机和可行性。","authors":"Tadashi Omoto, Atsushi Aoki, Kazuto Maruta, Tomoaki Masuda","doi":"10.5761/atcs.oa.22-00135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We studied the association between operative timing and the feasibility of mitral valve (MV) repair in active infective endocarditis (IE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-nine active IE patients who underwent MV operation were classified according to operative timing: within 48 hours (Term I: n = 7), between 3 and 14 days (Term II: n = 22), and ≥15 days (Term III: n = 20). Patient profiles, operative outcomes, and feasibility of MV repair were evaluated. Complexity score and severity score were used to define the feasibility of MV repair depending on the extent of infected lesion and technical difficulties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences in basic profile in the three groups. Rate of major complications was higher in Term I (86%) than II (41%, p = 0.031) and III (25%, p = 0.005). In-hospital mortality was also higher in Term I (43%) than II (9%, p = 0.039) and III (5%, p = 0.015). The three groups did not differ by feasibility of MV repair calculated by the two-score system or by frequency of MV repair (I: 57%, II: 59%, and III: 55%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Morbidity and mortality were high in urgent cases. Feasibility of MV repair is associated with the extent of infected lesion and technical difficulties, and not with operative timing.</p>","PeriodicalId":8037,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"29 1","pages":"23-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/77/4a/atcs-29-023.PMC9939675.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operative Timing and Feasibility of Mitral Valve Repair in Active Infective Endocarditis.\",\"authors\":\"Tadashi Omoto, Atsushi Aoki, Kazuto Maruta, Tomoaki Masuda\",\"doi\":\"10.5761/atcs.oa.22-00135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We studied the association between operative timing and the feasibility of mitral valve (MV) repair in active infective endocarditis (IE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-nine active IE patients who underwent MV operation were classified according to operative timing: within 48 hours (Term I: n = 7), between 3 and 14 days (Term II: n = 22), and ≥15 days (Term III: n = 20). Patient profiles, operative outcomes, and feasibility of MV repair were evaluated. Complexity score and severity score were used to define the feasibility of MV repair depending on the extent of infected lesion and technical difficulties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no differences in basic profile in the three groups. Rate of major complications was higher in Term I (86%) than II (41%, p = 0.031) and III (25%, p = 0.005). In-hospital mortality was also higher in Term I (43%) than II (9%, p = 0.039) and III (5%, p = 0.015). The three groups did not differ by feasibility of MV repair calculated by the two-score system or by frequency of MV repair (I: 57%, II: 59%, and III: 55%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Morbidity and mortality were high in urgent cases. Feasibility of MV repair is associated with the extent of infected lesion and technical difficulties, and not with operative timing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"23-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/77/4a/atcs-29-023.PMC9939675.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.22-00135\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/11/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.22-00135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们研究了手术时机与活动性感染性心内膜炎(IE)二尖瓣(MV)修复可行性之间的关系:根据手术时间将接受二尖瓣手术的 49 例活动性 IE 患者分类:48 小时内(I 期:n = 7)、3 至 14 天(II 期:n = 22)和≥15 天(III 期:n = 20)。对患者情况、手术效果和中压修复的可行性进行了评估。根据感染病灶的范围和技术难度,用复杂性评分和严重性评分来定义中风修补术的可行性:结果:三组患者的基本情况无差异。I期(86%)的主要并发症发生率高于II期(41%,P = 0.031)和III期(25%,P = 0.005)。一期(43%)的院内死亡率也高于二期(9%,P = 0.039)和三期(5%,P = 0.015)。根据两评分系统计算的中压修复可行性或中压修复频率,三组没有差异(Ⅰ期:57%;Ⅱ期:59%;Ⅲ期:55%):结论:急诊病例的发病率和死亡率较高。中压修复的可行性与感染病灶的范围和技术难度有关,与手术时机无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Operative Timing and Feasibility of Mitral Valve Repair in Active Infective Endocarditis.

Purpose: We studied the association between operative timing and the feasibility of mitral valve (MV) repair in active infective endocarditis (IE).

Methods: Forty-nine active IE patients who underwent MV operation were classified according to operative timing: within 48 hours (Term I: n = 7), between 3 and 14 days (Term II: n = 22), and ≥15 days (Term III: n = 20). Patient profiles, operative outcomes, and feasibility of MV repair were evaluated. Complexity score and severity score were used to define the feasibility of MV repair depending on the extent of infected lesion and technical difficulties.

Results: There were no differences in basic profile in the three groups. Rate of major complications was higher in Term I (86%) than II (41%, p = 0.031) and III (25%, p = 0.005). In-hospital mortality was also higher in Term I (43%) than II (9%, p = 0.039) and III (5%, p = 0.015). The three groups did not differ by feasibility of MV repair calculated by the two-score system or by frequency of MV repair (I: 57%, II: 59%, and III: 55%).

Conclusions: Morbidity and mortality were high in urgent cases. Feasibility of MV repair is associated with the extent of infected lesion and technical difficulties, and not with operative timing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Arterial Embolization and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Guided Lung Resection for Anomalous Systemic Arterial Blood Supply to Normal Lung: Two Case Reports. Surgery for Ascending Aortic Aneurysm and Aortic Valve Insufficiency in Conditions of Active Proceeding Syphilitic Aortitis and Valvulitis. Impact of Graft Velocity on Saphenous Vein Graft Atherosclerosis after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Surgery for Secondary Spontaneous Pneumothorax with Chronic Lung Diseases. Impact of Impella Support on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Postcardiotomy Cardiogenic Shock.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1