一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究,旨在评估基于织物的无线电治疗敷料与标准护理治疗对急性创伤和烧伤伤口生物膜感染的有效性。

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Advances in wound care Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-11 DOI:10.1089/wound.2023.0007
Rodney K Chan, Kristo Nuutila, Shomita S Mathew-Steiner, Victoria Diaz, Kristin Anselmo, Maria Batchinsky, Anders Carlsson, Nandini Ghosh, Chandan K Sen, Sashwati Roy
{"title":"一项前瞻性、随机、对照研究,旨在评估基于织物的无线电治疗敷料与标准护理治疗对急性创伤和烧伤伤口生物膜感染的有效性。","authors":"Rodney K Chan, Kristo Nuutila, Shomita S Mathew-Steiner, Victoria Diaz, Kristin Anselmo, Maria Batchinsky, Anders Carlsson, Nandini Ghosh, Chandan K Sen, Sashwati Roy","doi":"10.1089/wound.2023.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Despite advances in the use of topical and parenteral antimicrobial therapy and the practice of early tangential burn wound excision to manage bacterial load, 60% of the mortality from burns is attributed to bacterial biofilm infection. A low electric field (∼1 V) generated by the novel FDA-cleared wireless electroceutical dressing (WED) was previously shown to significantly prevent and disrupt burn biofilm infection in preclinical studies. Based on this observation, the purpose of this clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of the WED dressing powered by a silver-zinc electrocouple in the prevention and disruption of biofilm infection. <b>Approach</b>: A prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy of the WED compared with standard-of-care (SoC) dressing to treat biofilms. Burn wounds were randomized to receive either SoC or WED. Biopsies were collected on days 0 and 7 for histology, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) examination of biofilm, and for quantitative bacteriological analyses. <b>Results:</b> In total, 38 subjects were enrolled in the study. In 52% of the WED-treated wounds, little to no biofilm could be detected by SEM. WED significantly lowered or prevented increase of biofilm in all wounds compared with the pair-matched SoC-treated wounds. <b>Innovation:</b> WED is a simple, easy, and rapid method to protect the wound while also inhibiting infection. It is activated by a moist environment and the electrical field induces transient and micromolar amounts of superoxide anion radicals that will prevent bacterial growth. <b>Conclusion:</b> WED decreased biofilm infection better compared with SoC. The study was registered in clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04079998.</p>","PeriodicalId":7413,"journal":{"name":"Advances in wound care","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654645/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Fabric-Based Wireless Electroceutical Dressing Compared to Standard-of-Care Treatment Against Acute Trauma and Burn Wound Biofilm Infection.\",\"authors\":\"Rodney K Chan, Kristo Nuutila, Shomita S Mathew-Steiner, Victoria Diaz, Kristin Anselmo, Maria Batchinsky, Anders Carlsson, Nandini Ghosh, Chandan K Sen, Sashwati Roy\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/wound.2023.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Despite advances in the use of topical and parenteral antimicrobial therapy and the practice of early tangential burn wound excision to manage bacterial load, 60% of the mortality from burns is attributed to bacterial biofilm infection. A low electric field (∼1 V) generated by the novel FDA-cleared wireless electroceutical dressing (WED) was previously shown to significantly prevent and disrupt burn biofilm infection in preclinical studies. Based on this observation, the purpose of this clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of the WED dressing powered by a silver-zinc electrocouple in the prevention and disruption of biofilm infection. <b>Approach</b>: A prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy of the WED compared with standard-of-care (SoC) dressing to treat biofilms. Burn wounds were randomized to receive either SoC or WED. Biopsies were collected on days 0 and 7 for histology, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) examination of biofilm, and for quantitative bacteriological analyses. <b>Results:</b> In total, 38 subjects were enrolled in the study. In 52% of the WED-treated wounds, little to no biofilm could be detected by SEM. WED significantly lowered or prevented increase of biofilm in all wounds compared with the pair-matched SoC-treated wounds. <b>Innovation:</b> WED is a simple, easy, and rapid method to protect the wound while also inhibiting infection. It is activated by a moist environment and the electrical field induces transient and micromolar amounts of superoxide anion radicals that will prevent bacterial growth. <b>Conclusion:</b> WED decreased biofilm infection better compared with SoC. The study was registered in clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04079998.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in wound care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10654645/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in wound care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2023.0007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2023.0007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管在使用局部和胃肠外抗菌治疗以及早期切向烧伤伤口切除术来控制细菌负荷方面取得了进展,但60%的烧伤死亡率归因于细菌生物膜感染。低电场(~1 V) 先前在临床前研究中显示,由新型FDA批准的无线电治疗敷料(WED)产生的药物可显著预防和破坏烧伤生物膜感染。基于这一观察结果,本临床试验的目的是评估由银锌电偶供电的WED敷料在预防和破坏生物膜感染方面的疗效。方法:进行了一项前瞻性、随机、对照、单中心临床试验,以评估WED与标准护理(SoC)敷料治疗生物膜的疗效。烧伤伤口随机接受SoC或WED治疗。在第0天和第7天采集活检,用于组织学、生物膜的扫描电子显微镜(SEM)检查和定量细菌学分析。结果:共有38名受试者参与了这项研究。在52%的WED处理的伤口中,SEM几乎没有检测到生物膜。与配对的SoC处理的伤口相比,WED显著降低或阻止了所有伤口中生物膜的增加。创新:WED是一种简单、简单、快速的方法,既能保护伤口,又能抑制感染。它被潮湿的环境激活,电场会诱导瞬时和微摩尔量的超氧阴离子自由基,从而阻止细菌生长。结论:与SoC相比,WED能更好地降低生物膜感染。该研究在clinicaltrials.gov上注册为NCT04079998。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Fabric-Based Wireless Electroceutical Dressing Compared to Standard-of-Care Treatment Against Acute Trauma and Burn Wound Biofilm Infection.

Objective: Despite advances in the use of topical and parenteral antimicrobial therapy and the practice of early tangential burn wound excision to manage bacterial load, 60% of the mortality from burns is attributed to bacterial biofilm infection. A low electric field (∼1 V) generated by the novel FDA-cleared wireless electroceutical dressing (WED) was previously shown to significantly prevent and disrupt burn biofilm infection in preclinical studies. Based on this observation, the purpose of this clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of the WED dressing powered by a silver-zinc electrocouple in the prevention and disruption of biofilm infection. Approach: A prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy of the WED compared with standard-of-care (SoC) dressing to treat biofilms. Burn wounds were randomized to receive either SoC or WED. Biopsies were collected on days 0 and 7 for histology, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) examination of biofilm, and for quantitative bacteriological analyses. Results: In total, 38 subjects were enrolled in the study. In 52% of the WED-treated wounds, little to no biofilm could be detected by SEM. WED significantly lowered or prevented increase of biofilm in all wounds compared with the pair-matched SoC-treated wounds. Innovation: WED is a simple, easy, and rapid method to protect the wound while also inhibiting infection. It is activated by a moist environment and the electrical field induces transient and micromolar amounts of superoxide anion radicals that will prevent bacterial growth. Conclusion: WED decreased biofilm infection better compared with SoC. The study was registered in clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04079998.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in wound care
Advances in wound care Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
4.10%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Advances in Wound Care rapidly shares research from bench to bedside, with wound care applications for burns, major trauma, blast injuries, surgery, and diabetic ulcers. The Journal provides a critical, peer-reviewed forum for the field of tissue injury and repair, with an emphasis on acute and chronic wounds. Advances in Wound Care explores novel research approaches and practices to deliver the latest scientific discoveries and developments. Advances in Wound Care coverage includes: Skin bioengineering, Skin and tissue regeneration, Acute, chronic, and complex wounds, Dressings, Anti-scar strategies, Inflammation, Burns and healing, Biofilm, Oxygen and angiogenesis, Critical limb ischemia, Military wound care, New devices and technologies.
期刊最新文献
Alginate Formulation for Wound Healing Applications. Local Treatment of Wound Infections: A Review of Clinical Trials from 2013 to 2024. A Prospective Observational Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy for Complex Wounds: Influential Clinical Variables on Wound Healing Outcomes. Prediction of Healing Trajectory of Chronic Wounds Using a Machine Learning Approach. Topical Reconstituted High-Density Lipoproteins Elicit Anti-Inflammatory Effects in Diabetic Wounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1