抗生素预防与胎膜早破不良围产期结局之间的关系。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1806-9282.20211299
Thaísa de Souza Lima, Flávia Mariane Pagani, Carolina Bianchini Borges, Caetano Galvão Petrini, Marina Carvalho Paschoini, Edward Araújo Júnior, Alberto Borges Peixoto
{"title":"抗生素预防与胎膜早破不良围产期结局之间的关系。","authors":"Thaísa de Souza Lima,&nbsp;Flávia Mariane Pagani,&nbsp;Carolina Bianchini Borges,&nbsp;Caetano Galvão Petrini,&nbsp;Marina Carvalho Paschoini,&nbsp;Edward Araújo Júnior,&nbsp;Alberto Borges Peixoto","doi":"10.1590/1806-9282.20211299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between antibiotic prophylaxis and adverse perinatal outcomes in premature rupture of membranes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort included pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes (between 24 and 33+6 weeks) who used or did not use prophylactic antibiotics. Pearson's chi-square (χ²) test, Student's t-test, and binary logistic regression were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant effect was observed in patients with premature rupture of membranes using prophylactic antibiotics regarding amniotic fluid index (p=0.007), deepest vertical pocket (p=0.049), duration of antibiotic therapy (p≤0.001), C-reactive protein level upon admission (p≤0.001), leukocyte count upon admission (p=0.007), and length of stay in neonatal intensive care (p=0.047). A significant association was observed between the abovementioned patients and surfactant use during the neonatal period (p=0.04). A higher prevalence of surfactant use was noted in these patients (20.0 vs. 8.7%; p=0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No association was found between antibiotic prophylaxis and the presence of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes between 24 and 33+6 weeks of gestation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21234,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3d/0f/1806-9282-ramb-69-01-0024.PMC9937626.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between antibiotic prophylaxis and adverse perinatal outcomes in premature rupture of membranes.\",\"authors\":\"Thaísa de Souza Lima,&nbsp;Flávia Mariane Pagani,&nbsp;Carolina Bianchini Borges,&nbsp;Caetano Galvão Petrini,&nbsp;Marina Carvalho Paschoini,&nbsp;Edward Araújo Júnior,&nbsp;Alberto Borges Peixoto\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1806-9282.20211299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between antibiotic prophylaxis and adverse perinatal outcomes in premature rupture of membranes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort included pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes (between 24 and 33+6 weeks) who used or did not use prophylactic antibiotics. Pearson's chi-square (χ²) test, Student's t-test, and binary logistic regression were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant effect was observed in patients with premature rupture of membranes using prophylactic antibiotics regarding amniotic fluid index (p=0.007), deepest vertical pocket (p=0.049), duration of antibiotic therapy (p≤0.001), C-reactive protein level upon admission (p≤0.001), leukocyte count upon admission (p=0.007), and length of stay in neonatal intensive care (p=0.047). A significant association was observed between the abovementioned patients and surfactant use during the neonatal period (p=0.04). A higher prevalence of surfactant use was noted in these patients (20.0 vs. 8.7%; p=0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No association was found between antibiotic prophylaxis and the presence of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes between 24 and 33+6 weeks of gestation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3d/0f/1806-9282-ramb-69-01-0024.PMC9937626.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20211299\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20211299","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估抗生素预防与胎膜早破不良围产期结局之间的关系。方法:该回顾性队列包括使用或未使用预防性抗生素的胎膜早破孕妇(24 ~ 33+6周)。采用Pearson χ 2检验、Student’st检验和二元logistic回归进行统计分析。结果:预防性抗生素对早破羊水指数(p=0.007)、最深垂直袋(p=0.049)、抗生素治疗时间(p≤0.001)、入院时c反应蛋白水平(p≤0.001)、入院时白细胞计数(p=0.007)、新生儿重症监护时间(p=0.047)均有显著影响。上述患者与新生儿期表面活性剂的使用有显著相关性(p=0.04)。这些患者使用表面活性剂的比例较高(20.0% vs. 8.7%;p = 0.04)。结论:在妊娠24 ~ 33+6周的胎膜早破孕妇中,抗生素预防与不良围产期结局无关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association between antibiotic prophylaxis and adverse perinatal outcomes in premature rupture of membranes.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between antibiotic prophylaxis and adverse perinatal outcomes in premature rupture of membranes.

Methods: This retrospective cohort included pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes (between 24 and 33+6 weeks) who used or did not use prophylactic antibiotics. Pearson's chi-square (χ²) test, Student's t-test, and binary logistic regression were used for statistical analysis.

Results: A significant effect was observed in patients with premature rupture of membranes using prophylactic antibiotics regarding amniotic fluid index (p=0.007), deepest vertical pocket (p=0.049), duration of antibiotic therapy (p≤0.001), C-reactive protein level upon admission (p≤0.001), leukocyte count upon admission (p=0.007), and length of stay in neonatal intensive care (p=0.047). A significant association was observed between the abovementioned patients and surfactant use during the neonatal period (p=0.04). A higher prevalence of surfactant use was noted in these patients (20.0 vs. 8.7%; p=0.04).

Conclusion: No association was found between antibiotic prophylaxis and the presence of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with premature rupture of membranes between 24 and 33+6 weeks of gestation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
276
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: A Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira (RAMB), editada pela Associação Médica Brasileira, desde 1954, tem por objetivo publicar artigos que contribuam para o conhecimento médico.
期刊最新文献
Anatomical features of sella turcica with comprehensive literature review. ERRATUM. A needful, unique, and in-place evaluation of the injuries in earthquake victims with computed tomography, in catastrophic disasters! The 2023 Turkey-Syria earthquakes: part II. The challenge of tobacco and nicotine use among women. 18F-fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1