Mustafa Syed, Matthew Cagely, Prashant Dogra, Lauren Hollmer, Joseph D Butner, Vittorio Cristini, Eugene J Koay
{"title":"免疫检查点抑制剂治疗反应评估使用肿瘤物理为基础的数学模型。","authors":"Mustafa Syed, Matthew Cagely, Prashant Dogra, Lauren Hollmer, Joseph D Butner, Vittorio Cristini, Eugene J Koay","doi":"10.1002/wnan.1855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The field of oncology has transformed with the advent of immunotherapies. The standard of care for multiple cancers now includes novel drugs that target key checkpoints that function to modulate immune responses, enabling the patient's immune system to elicit an effective anti-tumor response. While these immune-based approaches can have dramatic effects in terms of significantly reducing tumor burden and prolonging survival for patients, the therapeutic approach remains active only in a minority of patients and is often not durable. Multiple biological investigations have identified key markers that predict response to the most common form of immunotherapy-immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). These biomarkers help enrich patients for ICI but are not 100% predictive. Understanding the complex interactions of these biomarkers with other pathways and factors that lead to ICI resistance remains a major goal. Principles of oncophysics-the idea that cancer can be described as a multiscale physical aberration-have shown promise in recent years in terms of capturing the essence of the complexities of ICI interactions. Here, we review the biological knowledge of mechanisms of ICI action and how these are incorporated into modern oncophysics-based mathematical models. Building on the success of oncophysics-based mathematical models may help to discover new, rational methods to engineer immunotherapy for patients in the future. This article is categorized under: Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Nanomedicine for Oncologic Disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":23697,"journal":{"name":"Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology","volume":"15 2","pages":"e1855"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy response evaluation using oncophysics-based mathematical models.\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Syed, Matthew Cagely, Prashant Dogra, Lauren Hollmer, Joseph D Butner, Vittorio Cristini, Eugene J Koay\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wnan.1855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The field of oncology has transformed with the advent of immunotherapies. The standard of care for multiple cancers now includes novel drugs that target key checkpoints that function to modulate immune responses, enabling the patient's immune system to elicit an effective anti-tumor response. While these immune-based approaches can have dramatic effects in terms of significantly reducing tumor burden and prolonging survival for patients, the therapeutic approach remains active only in a minority of patients and is often not durable. Multiple biological investigations have identified key markers that predict response to the most common form of immunotherapy-immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). These biomarkers help enrich patients for ICI but are not 100% predictive. Understanding the complex interactions of these biomarkers with other pathways and factors that lead to ICI resistance remains a major goal. Principles of oncophysics-the idea that cancer can be described as a multiscale physical aberration-have shown promise in recent years in terms of capturing the essence of the complexities of ICI interactions. Here, we review the biological knowledge of mechanisms of ICI action and how these are incorporated into modern oncophysics-based mathematical models. Building on the success of oncophysics-based mathematical models may help to discover new, rational methods to engineer immunotherapy for patients in the future. This article is categorized under: Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Nanomedicine for Oncologic Disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"e1855\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1855\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1855","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy response evaluation using oncophysics-based mathematical models.
The field of oncology has transformed with the advent of immunotherapies. The standard of care for multiple cancers now includes novel drugs that target key checkpoints that function to modulate immune responses, enabling the patient's immune system to elicit an effective anti-tumor response. While these immune-based approaches can have dramatic effects in terms of significantly reducing tumor burden and prolonging survival for patients, the therapeutic approach remains active only in a minority of patients and is often not durable. Multiple biological investigations have identified key markers that predict response to the most common form of immunotherapy-immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). These biomarkers help enrich patients for ICI but are not 100% predictive. Understanding the complex interactions of these biomarkers with other pathways and factors that lead to ICI resistance remains a major goal. Principles of oncophysics-the idea that cancer can be described as a multiscale physical aberration-have shown promise in recent years in terms of capturing the essence of the complexities of ICI interactions. Here, we review the biological knowledge of mechanisms of ICI action and how these are incorporated into modern oncophysics-based mathematical models. Building on the success of oncophysics-based mathematical models may help to discover new, rational methods to engineer immunotherapy for patients in the future. This article is categorized under: Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Nanomedicine for Oncologic Disease.
期刊介绍:
Nanotechnology stands as one of the pivotal scientific domains of the twenty-first century, recognized universally for its transformative potential. Within the biomedical realm, nanotechnology finds crucial applications in nanobiotechnology and nanomedicine, highlighted as one of seven emerging research areas under the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. The advancement of this field hinges upon collaborative efforts across diverse disciplines, including clinicians, biomedical engineers, materials scientists, applied physicists, and toxicologists.
Recognizing the imperative for a high-caliber interdisciplinary review platform, WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology emerges to fulfill this critical need. Our topical coverage spans a wide spectrum, encompassing areas such as toxicology and regulatory issues, implantable materials and surgical technologies, diagnostic tools, nanotechnology approaches to biology, therapeutic approaches and drug discovery, and biology-inspired nanomaterials. Join us in exploring the frontiers of nanotechnology and its profound impact on biomedical research and healthcare.