Flávia Barreto Tavares Chiavone, Fernanda Belmiro de Andrade, Anderson Felipe Moura da Silva, Isabelle Campos de Azevedo, Quenia Camille Soares Martins, Viviane Euzebia Pereira Santos
{"title":"护理学验证性研究的分析类型:范围回顾。","authors":"Flávia Barreto Tavares Chiavone, Fernanda Belmiro de Andrade, Anderson Felipe Moura da Silva, Isabelle Campos de Azevedo, Quenia Camille Soares Martins, Viviane Euzebia Pereira Santos","doi":"10.17533/udea.iee.v40n3e09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify and map the types of analysis in nursing validation studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a scoping review with collection carried out in July 2020. The following data extraction indicators were considered: year of publication, country of origin, type of study, level of evidence, scientific references for validation and types of analyses. Data were collected in the following bases: U.S. National Library of Medicine, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, SCOPUS, COCHRANE, Web of Science, PSYCHINFO, Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences, CAPES Theses and Dissertation Portal, Education Resources Information Center, The National Library of Australia's Trobe, Academic Archive Online, DART-Europe E-Theses Portal, Electronic Theses Online Service, Open Access Scientific Repository of Portugal, National ETD Portal, Theses Canada, Theses and dissertations from Latin America.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample consisted of 881 studies, with a predominance of articles (841; 95.5%), with a prevalence of publications in 2019 (152;17.2%), of Brazilian origin (377; 42.8%), of the methodological study type (352; 39.9%). Polit and Beck stood out as the methodological reference (207; 23.5%) and Cronbach's Alpha (421; 47.8%) as the statistical test. Regarding the type of analysis, the exploratory factor analysis and the content validation index stood out.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of at least one method of analysis was evident in more than half of the studies, which implied the need to carry out several statistical tests in order to evaluate the validation of the instrument used and show its reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":53477,"journal":{"name":"Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10017130/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Types of analysis of validation studies in nursing: scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Flávia Barreto Tavares Chiavone, Fernanda Belmiro de Andrade, Anderson Felipe Moura da Silva, Isabelle Campos de Azevedo, Quenia Camille Soares Martins, Viviane Euzebia Pereira Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.17533/udea.iee.v40n3e09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify and map the types of analysis in nursing validation studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a scoping review with collection carried out in July 2020. The following data extraction indicators were considered: year of publication, country of origin, type of study, level of evidence, scientific references for validation and types of analyses. Data were collected in the following bases: U.S. National Library of Medicine, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, SCOPUS, COCHRANE, Web of Science, PSYCHINFO, Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences, CAPES Theses and Dissertation Portal, Education Resources Information Center, The National Library of Australia's Trobe, Academic Archive Online, DART-Europe E-Theses Portal, Electronic Theses Online Service, Open Access Scientific Repository of Portugal, National ETD Portal, Theses Canada, Theses and dissertations from Latin America.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample consisted of 881 studies, with a predominance of articles (841; 95.5%), with a prevalence of publications in 2019 (152;17.2%), of Brazilian origin (377; 42.8%), of the methodological study type (352; 39.9%). Polit and Beck stood out as the methodological reference (207; 23.5%) and Cronbach's Alpha (421; 47.8%) as the statistical test. Regarding the type of analysis, the exploratory factor analysis and the content validation index stood out.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of at least one method of analysis was evident in more than half of the studies, which implied the need to carry out several statistical tests in order to evaluate the validation of the instrument used and show its reliability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10017130/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v40n3e09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v40n3e09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:识别和绘制护理验证研究中的分析类型。方法:这是一项范围综述，收集于2020年7月进行。考虑了以下数据提取指标:出版年份、原产国、研究类型、证据水平、验证的科学参考文献和分析类型。数据收集于以下基地:美国国家医学图书馆、护理和相关健康文献累积索引、SCOPUS、COCHRANE、Web of Science、PSYCHINFO、拉丁美洲和加勒比健康科学文献、CAPES论文和论文门户网站、教育资源信息中心、澳大利亚国家图书馆Trobe、学术档案在线、欧洲电子论文门户网站、电子论文在线服务、葡萄牙开放获取科学知识库、国家ETD门户网站、论文加拿大、拉丁美洲的论文和学位论文。结果:样本包括881篇研究，优势文献为841篇;95.5%)， 2019年的出版物患病率(152篇;17.2%)，原籍巴西(377篇;42.8%)，方法学研究类型(352例;39.9%)。波利特和贝克作为方法论参考而突出(207;23.5%)和Cronbach’s Alpha (421;47.8%)作为统计检验。在分析类型方面，探索性因子分析和内容验证指标较为突出。结论:在超过一半的研究中，至少使用了一种分析方法，这意味着需要进行几项统计检验，以评估所使用工具的有效性并显示其可靠性。
Types of analysis of validation studies in nursing: scoping review.
Objectives: To identify and map the types of analysis in nursing validation studies.
Methods: This is a scoping review with collection carried out in July 2020. The following data extraction indicators were considered: year of publication, country of origin, type of study, level of evidence, scientific references for validation and types of analyses. Data were collected in the following bases: U.S. National Library of Medicine, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, SCOPUS, COCHRANE, Web of Science, PSYCHINFO, Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences, CAPES Theses and Dissertation Portal, Education Resources Information Center, The National Library of Australia's Trobe, Academic Archive Online, DART-Europe E-Theses Portal, Electronic Theses Online Service, Open Access Scientific Repository of Portugal, National ETD Portal, Theses Canada, Theses and dissertations from Latin America.
Results: The sample consisted of 881 studies, with a predominance of articles (841; 95.5%), with a prevalence of publications in 2019 (152;17.2%), of Brazilian origin (377; 42.8%), of the methodological study type (352; 39.9%). Polit and Beck stood out as the methodological reference (207; 23.5%) and Cronbach's Alpha (421; 47.8%) as the statistical test. Regarding the type of analysis, the exploratory factor analysis and the content validation index stood out.
Conclusions: The use of at least one method of analysis was evident in more than half of the studies, which implied the need to carry out several statistical tests in order to evaluate the validation of the instrument used and show its reliability.
期刊介绍：
The mission of the journal of Nursing and Education is to present scientific and technical information about health, illnesses and related topics. The journal serves as the conduit [medium] through which the experiences of our own nursing and social science departments can be shared within Columbia and internationally. It is written primarily for nurses, general health practitioners and other related disciplines but can also be used by students and researchers.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
