老年人虐待筛查和干预的研究重点:老年急诊护理应用研究(GEAR)网络范围审查和共识声明。

IF 1.6 2区 心理学 Q3 GERONTOLOGY Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.1080/08946566.2021.1904313
Jay Kayser, Nancy Morrow-Howell, Tony E Rosen, Stephanie Skees, Michelle Doering, Sunday Clark, Karen Hurka-Richardson, Rayad Bin Shams, Thom Ringer, Ula Hwang, Timothy F Platts-Mills, The Gear Network
{"title":"老年人虐待筛查和干预的研究重点:老年急诊护理应用研究(GEAR)网络范围审查和共识声明。","authors":"Jay Kayser,&nbsp;Nancy Morrow-Howell,&nbsp;Tony E Rosen,&nbsp;Stephanie Skees,&nbsp;Michelle Doering,&nbsp;Sunday Clark,&nbsp;Karen Hurka-Richardson,&nbsp;Rayad Bin Shams,&nbsp;Thom Ringer,&nbsp;Ula Hwang,&nbsp;Timothy F Platts-Mills,&nbsp;The Gear Network","doi":"10.1080/08946566.2021.1904313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research (GEAR) Network (1) conducted a scoping review of the current literature on the identification of and interventions to address elder abuse among patients receiving care in emergency departments and (2) used this review to prioritize research questions for knowledge development. Two questions guided the scoping review: What is the effect of universal emergency department screening compared to targeted screening or usual practice on cases of elder abuse identified, safety outcomes, and health care utilization?; and What is the safety, health, legal, and psychosocial impact of emergency department-based interventions vs. usual care for patients experiencing elder abuse? We searched five article databases. Additional material was located through reference lists of identified publications, PsychInfo, and Google Scholar. The results were discussed in a consensus conference; and stakeholders voted to prioritize research questions. No studies were identified that directly addressed the first question regarding assessment strategies, but four instruments used for elder abuse screening in the emergency department were identified. For the second question, we located six articles on interventions for elder abuse in the emergency department; however, none directly addressed the question of comparative effectiveness. Based on these findings, GEAR participants identified five questions as priorities for future research - two related to screening, two related to intervention, and one encompassed both. In sum, research to identify best practices for elder abuse assessment and intervention in emergency departments is still needed. Although there are practical and ethical challenges, rigorous experimental studies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46983,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08946566.2021.1904313","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research priorities for elder abuse screening and intervention: A Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research (GEAR) network scoping review and consensus statement.\",\"authors\":\"Jay Kayser,&nbsp;Nancy Morrow-Howell,&nbsp;Tony E Rosen,&nbsp;Stephanie Skees,&nbsp;Michelle Doering,&nbsp;Sunday Clark,&nbsp;Karen Hurka-Richardson,&nbsp;Rayad Bin Shams,&nbsp;Thom Ringer,&nbsp;Ula Hwang,&nbsp;Timothy F Platts-Mills,&nbsp;The Gear Network\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08946566.2021.1904313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research (GEAR) Network (1) conducted a scoping review of the current literature on the identification of and interventions to address elder abuse among patients receiving care in emergency departments and (2) used this review to prioritize research questions for knowledge development. Two questions guided the scoping review: What is the effect of universal emergency department screening compared to targeted screening or usual practice on cases of elder abuse identified, safety outcomes, and health care utilization?; and What is the safety, health, legal, and psychosocial impact of emergency department-based interventions vs. usual care for patients experiencing elder abuse? We searched five article databases. Additional material was located through reference lists of identified publications, PsychInfo, and Google Scholar. The results were discussed in a consensus conference; and stakeholders voted to prioritize research questions. No studies were identified that directly addressed the first question regarding assessment strategies, but four instruments used for elder abuse screening in the emergency department were identified. For the second question, we located six articles on interventions for elder abuse in the emergency department; however, none directly addressed the question of comparative effectiveness. Based on these findings, GEAR participants identified five questions as priorities for future research - two related to screening, two related to intervention, and one encompassed both. In sum, research to identify best practices for elder abuse assessment and intervention in emergency departments is still needed. Although there are practical and ethical challenges, rigorous experimental studies are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08946566.2021.1904313\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08946566.2021.1904313\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08946566.2021.1904313","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

老年急诊护理应用研究(GEAR)网络(1)对当前关于识别和解决在急诊科接受护理的老年人虐待的干预措施的文献进行了范围综述,(2)利用这一综述对知识发展的研究问题进行了优先排序。两个问题指导了范围审查:与有针对性的筛查或常规做法相比,普遍的急诊科筛查对确定的虐待老年人病例、安全结果和医疗保健利用的影响是什么?急诊干预与常规护理对遭受虐待的老年人的安全、健康、法律和心理社会影响是什么?我们检索了5个文章数据库。通过已确定的出版物、PsychInfo和Google Scholar的参考列表找到了其他材料。结果在协商一致的会议上进行了讨论;利益相关者投票决定优先考虑研究问题。没有发现任何研究直接解决关于评估策略的第一个问题,但确定了在急诊科用于老年人虐待筛查的四种工具。对于第二个问题,我们找到了六篇关于在急诊科对虐待老年人进行干预的文章;但是,没有一个直接涉及相对效力的问题。基于这些发现,GEAR参与者确定了未来研究的五个优先问题——两个与筛查有关,两个与干预有关,一个包括两者。总之,仍然需要进行研究,以确定在急诊科进行虐待老人评估和干预的最佳做法。尽管存在实践和伦理方面的挑战,但仍需要严格的实验研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Research priorities for elder abuse screening and intervention: A Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research (GEAR) network scoping review and consensus statement.

The Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research (GEAR) Network (1) conducted a scoping review of the current literature on the identification of and interventions to address elder abuse among patients receiving care in emergency departments and (2) used this review to prioritize research questions for knowledge development. Two questions guided the scoping review: What is the effect of universal emergency department screening compared to targeted screening or usual practice on cases of elder abuse identified, safety outcomes, and health care utilization?; and What is the safety, health, legal, and psychosocial impact of emergency department-based interventions vs. usual care for patients experiencing elder abuse? We searched five article databases. Additional material was located through reference lists of identified publications, PsychInfo, and Google Scholar. The results were discussed in a consensus conference; and stakeholders voted to prioritize research questions. No studies were identified that directly addressed the first question regarding assessment strategies, but four instruments used for elder abuse screening in the emergency department were identified. For the second question, we located six articles on interventions for elder abuse in the emergency department; however, none directly addressed the question of comparative effectiveness. Based on these findings, GEAR participants identified five questions as priorities for future research - two related to screening, two related to intervention, and one encompassed both. In sum, research to identify best practices for elder abuse assessment and intervention in emergency departments is still needed. Although there are practical and ethical challenges, rigorous experimental studies are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
15.80%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect is the peer-reviewed quarterly journal that explores the advances in research, policy and practice, and clinical and ethical issues surrounding the abuse and neglect of older people. This unique forum provides state-of-the-art research and practice that is both international and multidisciplinary in scope. The journal"s broad, comprehensive approach is only one of its strengths—it presents training issues, research findings, case studies, practice and policy issues, book and media reviews, commentary, and historical background on a wide range of topics. Readers get tools and techniques needed for better detecting and responding to actual or potential elder abuse and neglect.
期刊最新文献
Older adults who use drugs: an examination of policy and preparedness in nursing facilities. Transforming learning for adult protective services caseworker certification training: program evaluation of simulation training. Correction. Elder mistreatment and cognitive functioning among Chinese older adults in the U.S. Loneliness could lead to risk of fraud victimization for middle-aged and older adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1