Nir Tsur, Ella Segal, Eyal Yosefof, Noam Koch, Idan Zeeman, Ella Reifen, Ory Wiesel, Gideon Bachar, Esmat Najjar
{"title":"甲状腺分裂气管切开术:短期和长期的结果。","authors":"Nir Tsur, Ella Segal, Eyal Yosefof, Noam Koch, Idan Zeeman, Ella Reifen, Ory Wiesel, Gideon Bachar, Esmat Najjar","doi":"10.14639/0392-100X-N2192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Compare long-term outcomes of thyroid-split and standard thyroid-retraction tracheostomy in a large cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The healthcare database of a university-affiliated hospital was searched for past patients over 18 years of age from all of the hospital's wards on whom an ear, nose, and throat specialist performed a tracheostomy in the operating room between 2010 and 2020. Clinical data were extracted from the hospital and outpatient medical records. Life-threatening and non-life-threatening intra-operative and early and late post-operative adverse events in patients who underwent split-thyroid tracheostomy were compared with those who underwent standard tracheostomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in intra-operative and early post-operative complications, hospitalisation length, or early reoperation and death rates between the 140 (28%) thyroid-split tracheostomy patients and the 354 (72%) standard tracheostomy patients, although the thyroid-split group had more non-decannulated patients and a longer operative time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Thyroid-split tracheostomy is safe and feasible. Compared to the standard procedure, it provides better exposure and a similar rate of complications, although its de-cannulation success rate is lower.</p>","PeriodicalId":6890,"journal":{"name":"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica","volume":"43 2","pages":"99-107"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6e/5d/aoi-2023-02-99.PMC10132481.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thyroid-split tracheostomy: short- and long-term outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Nir Tsur, Ella Segal, Eyal Yosefof, Noam Koch, Idan Zeeman, Ella Reifen, Ory Wiesel, Gideon Bachar, Esmat Najjar\",\"doi\":\"10.14639/0392-100X-N2192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Compare long-term outcomes of thyroid-split and standard thyroid-retraction tracheostomy in a large cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The healthcare database of a university-affiliated hospital was searched for past patients over 18 years of age from all of the hospital's wards on whom an ear, nose, and throat specialist performed a tracheostomy in the operating room between 2010 and 2020. Clinical data were extracted from the hospital and outpatient medical records. Life-threatening and non-life-threatening intra-operative and early and late post-operative adverse events in patients who underwent split-thyroid tracheostomy were compared with those who underwent standard tracheostomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in intra-operative and early post-operative complications, hospitalisation length, or early reoperation and death rates between the 140 (28%) thyroid-split tracheostomy patients and the 354 (72%) standard tracheostomy patients, although the thyroid-split group had more non-decannulated patients and a longer operative time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Thyroid-split tracheostomy is safe and feasible. Compared to the standard procedure, it provides better exposure and a similar rate of complications, although its de-cannulation success rate is lower.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica\",\"volume\":\"43 2\",\"pages\":\"99-107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6e/5d/aoi-2023-02-99.PMC10132481.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2192\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N2192","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Thyroid-split tracheostomy: short- and long-term outcomes.
Objective: Compare long-term outcomes of thyroid-split and standard thyroid-retraction tracheostomy in a large cohort.
Methods: The healthcare database of a university-affiliated hospital was searched for past patients over 18 years of age from all of the hospital's wards on whom an ear, nose, and throat specialist performed a tracheostomy in the operating room between 2010 and 2020. Clinical data were extracted from the hospital and outpatient medical records. Life-threatening and non-life-threatening intra-operative and early and late post-operative adverse events in patients who underwent split-thyroid tracheostomy were compared with those who underwent standard tracheostomy.
Results: There was no significant difference in intra-operative and early post-operative complications, hospitalisation length, or early reoperation and death rates between the 140 (28%) thyroid-split tracheostomy patients and the 354 (72%) standard tracheostomy patients, although the thyroid-split group had more non-decannulated patients and a longer operative time.
Conclusions: Thyroid-split tracheostomy is safe and feasible. Compared to the standard procedure, it provides better exposure and a similar rate of complications, although its de-cannulation success rate is lower.
期刊介绍:
Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica first appeared as “Annali di Laringologia Otologia e Faringologia” and was founded in 1901 by Giulio Masini.
It is the official publication of the Italian Hospital Otology Association (A.O.O.I.) and, since 1976, also of the Società Italiana di Otorinolaringoiatria e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale (S.I.O.Ch.C.-F.).
The journal publishes original articles (clinical trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional surveys, and diagnostic test assessments) of interest in the field of otorhinolaryngology as well as clinical techniques and technology (a short report of unique or original methods for surgical techniques, medical management or new devices or technology), editorials (including editorial guests – special contribution) and letters to the Editor-in-Chief.
Articles concerning science investigations and well prepared systematic reviews (including meta-analyses) on themes related to basic science, clinical otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery have high priority.