在 COVID-19 大流行期间,基于缩放的在线教案与课堂教案在创造力和元认知方面的表现差异。

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH Pub Date : 2023-02-21 DOI:10.1007/s10984-023-09455-z
Rotem Maor, Rotem Levi, Zemira Mevarech, Nurit Paz-Baruch, Niv Grinshpan, Alex Milman, Sarit Shlomo, Michal Zion
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间,基于缩放的在线教案与课堂教案在创造力和元认知方面的表现差异。","authors":"Rotem Maor, Rotem Levi, Zemira Mevarech, Nurit Paz-Baruch, Niv Grinshpan, Alex Milman, Sarit Shlomo, Michal Zion","doi":"10.1007/s10984-023-09455-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 crisis has forced education systems around the world to switch hurriedly from learning in class to learning via online technology. One of the common platforms worldwide for teaching online was zoom. Working under uncertain conditions and facing rapid changes are characteristics of the twenty-first century. Coping adaptively with these challenges requires teachers to apply twenty-first century skills such as creativity and metacognition in their teaching. The purpose of the present study was to examine whether teachers integrate metacognition and creativity in their online lessons more than in classroom instruction. To examine the research question, we analyzed 50 lesson reports (25 for each learning environment) using a mixed-method design model. We used a performance assessment that was based on a creativity metacognitive teaching reports index. Teachers reported greater use of the 'debugging' metacognitive component in online lessons than in classroom lessons. Also, an online environment could provide a suitable platform for promoting students' learning process and encourage teachers to be more creative in terms of diversifying their teaching methods and developing student's creativity. However, the originality component of creativity was less pronounced in online lesson reports. These results can contribute to the field of blended learning and to the literature dealing with the adaptation of teaching to learning environments in the twenty-first century in general and during pandemics in particular.</p>","PeriodicalId":39853,"journal":{"name":"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9942048/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Difference between zoom-based online versus classroom lesson plan performances in creativity and metacognition during COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Rotem Maor, Rotem Levi, Zemira Mevarech, Nurit Paz-Baruch, Niv Grinshpan, Alex Milman, Sarit Shlomo, Michal Zion\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10984-023-09455-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The COVID-19 crisis has forced education systems around the world to switch hurriedly from learning in class to learning via online technology. One of the common platforms worldwide for teaching online was zoom. Working under uncertain conditions and facing rapid changes are characteristics of the twenty-first century. Coping adaptively with these challenges requires teachers to apply twenty-first century skills such as creativity and metacognition in their teaching. The purpose of the present study was to examine whether teachers integrate metacognition and creativity in their online lessons more than in classroom instruction. To examine the research question, we analyzed 50 lesson reports (25 for each learning environment) using a mixed-method design model. We used a performance assessment that was based on a creativity metacognitive teaching reports index. Teachers reported greater use of the 'debugging' metacognitive component in online lessons than in classroom lessons. Also, an online environment could provide a suitable platform for promoting students' learning process and encourage teachers to be more creative in terms of diversifying their teaching methods and developing student's creativity. However, the originality component of creativity was less pronounced in online lesson reports. These results can contribute to the field of blended learning and to the literature dealing with the adaptation of teaching to learning environments in the twenty-first century in general and during pandemics in particular.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9942048/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-023-09455-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-023-09455-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19 危机迫使世界各地的教育系统匆忙从课堂学习转向在线技术学习。zoom是世界上常用的在线教学平台之一。在不确定的条件下工作和面对快速变化是二十一世纪的特征。要适应这些挑战,就要求教师在教学中应用二十一世纪的技能,如创造力和元认知。本研究旨在探讨教师在网络课程中是否比在课堂教学中更多地融入了元认知和创造力。为了研究这个问题,我们采用混合方法设计模式分析了 50 份课程报告(每个学习环境 25 份)。我们采用了基于创造性元认知教学报告指数的绩效评估。与课堂教学相比,教师在网络课程中更多地使用了 "调试 "元认知部分。此外,网络环境可以为促进学生的学习过程提供一个合适的平台,并鼓励教师在多样化教学方法和培养学生创造力方面发挥更大的创造力。不过,创造力中的原创性部分在网络课程报告中不太明显。这些结果可以为混合式学习领域以及有关二十一世纪尤其是大流行病期间教学与学习环境相适应的文献做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Difference between zoom-based online versus classroom lesson plan performances in creativity and metacognition during COVID-19 pandemic.

The COVID-19 crisis has forced education systems around the world to switch hurriedly from learning in class to learning via online technology. One of the common platforms worldwide for teaching online was zoom. Working under uncertain conditions and facing rapid changes are characteristics of the twenty-first century. Coping adaptively with these challenges requires teachers to apply twenty-first century skills such as creativity and metacognition in their teaching. The purpose of the present study was to examine whether teachers integrate metacognition and creativity in their online lessons more than in classroom instruction. To examine the research question, we analyzed 50 lesson reports (25 for each learning environment) using a mixed-method design model. We used a performance assessment that was based on a creativity metacognitive teaching reports index. Teachers reported greater use of the 'debugging' metacognitive component in online lessons than in classroom lessons. Also, an online environment could provide a suitable platform for promoting students' learning process and encourage teachers to be more creative in terms of diversifying their teaching methods and developing student's creativity. However, the originality component of creativity was less pronounced in online lesson reports. These results can contribute to the field of blended learning and to the literature dealing with the adaptation of teaching to learning environments in the twenty-first century in general and during pandemics in particular.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH
LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS RESEARCH Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Learning Environments Research publishes original academic papers dealing with the study of learning environments, including theoretical reflections, reports of quantitative and qualitative research, critical and integrative literature reviews and meta-analyses, discussion of methodological issues, reports of the development and validation of assessment instruments, and reviews of books and evaluation instruments.  The scope of the journal deliberately is very broad in terms of both substance and methods. `Learning environment'' refers to the social, physical, psychological and pedagogical contexts in which learning occurs and which affect student achievement and attitudes. The aim of the journal is to increase our understanding of pre-primary, primary, high school, college and university, and lifelong learning environments irrespective of subject area. Apart from classroom-level and school-level environments, special attention is given to the many out-of-school learning environments such as the home, science centres, and television, etc. The influence of the rapidly developing field of Information Technology with its whole new range of learning environments is an important aspect of the scope of the journal. A wide range of qualitative and quantitative methods for studying learning enviromnents, and the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, are strongly encouraged. The journal has an affiliation with the American Educational Research Association''s Special Interest Group on the Study of Learning Environments. However, having Regional Editors and an Editorial Board from around the world ensures that LER is a truly international journal.
期刊最新文献
Patterns of university online teaching and learning delivery approaches and students’ performance during COVID-19 Adaptation and evaluation of an Estonian version of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction (QTI) Pedagogical strategies employed in the Emergency Remote Learning Environment during the COVID-19 pandemic: The tale of teachers and school ICT coordinators Promoting adolescent subjective well-being: a classroom environment approach Value vs. vulnerability: exploring asynchronous commenting in lecture-capture video recordings for undergraduate medical and dental students and its impact on learning through a pre and post survey design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1