癌症晚期患者最佳支持性护理护理人员生活质量与负担的相关性。

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Indian Journal of Palliative Care Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-17 DOI:10.25259/IJPC_175_2022
Manavalan Manivannan, Gunaseelan Karunanithi, Subitha Lakshminarayanan
{"title":"癌症晚期患者最佳支持性护理护理人员生活质量与负担的相关性。","authors":"Manavalan Manivannan,&nbsp;Gunaseelan Karunanithi,&nbsp;Subitha Lakshminarayanan","doi":"10.25259/IJPC_175_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patients with advanced cancer with incurable diseases are generally cared for by their families in India. There is a lack of data on the perceived caregiver burden, quality of life (QOL) of patients and caregivers in India, especially among cancer patients not on any oncologic management.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study among 220 patients of advanced cancer on best supportive care and their respective 220 family caregivers. Our primary objective was to identify a correlation between caregiver burden and QOL. After taking informed consent from both patients and caregivers, we assessed the QOL of the patient using the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 Palliative Care (QLQ C15PAL) questionnaire from the patient, assessing the Caregiver Burden using Zarit Burden Interview, assessing the QOL of the caregiver using the WHO QOL BREF Questionnaire, in a single session during their routine follow-up in the Palliative Care Clinic of our institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We noticed a statistically significant negative (Spearman) correlation between the Caregiver Burden as assessed by Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) and the psychological (r = -0.302, <i>P</i> < 0.01), social (r= -0.498, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and environmental (r = -0.396, <i>P</i> < 0.01) domains of the WHO QOL BREF Questionnaire. Caregiving Burden as assessed ZBI total score was noted to have a statistically significant negative correlation with physical functioning (r = -0.37, <i>P</i> < 0.01), emotional functioning (r = -0.435, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and global QOL scores (r = -0.499, <i>P</i> < 0.01) assessed from the patient using the EORTC QLQ C15 PAL questionnaire. It also had a statistically significant small positive correlation with EORTC QLQ C15 PAL symptom scores, such as dyspnoea, insomnia, constipation, nausea, fatigue and pain. The median caregiver burden score was 39, showing higher burden as compared to previous studies. Caregivers who were spouses of the patient, illiterate, homemakers, with low-income families reported higher burden.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A high perceived caregiving burden is associated with impaired QOL in family caregivers of advanced cancer patients on best supportive care. Multiple patient related factors and demographic factors tend to affect burden of the caregiver.</p>","PeriodicalId":13319,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ad/2d/IJPC-29-089.PMC9945025.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between Quality of Life and Burden in Caregivers of Advanced Stage Cancer Patients on Best Supportive Care.\",\"authors\":\"Manavalan Manivannan,&nbsp;Gunaseelan Karunanithi,&nbsp;Subitha Lakshminarayanan\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/IJPC_175_2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patients with advanced cancer with incurable diseases are generally cared for by their families in India. There is a lack of data on the perceived caregiver burden, quality of life (QOL) of patients and caregivers in India, especially among cancer patients not on any oncologic management.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional study among 220 patients of advanced cancer on best supportive care and their respective 220 family caregivers. Our primary objective was to identify a correlation between caregiver burden and QOL. After taking informed consent from both patients and caregivers, we assessed the QOL of the patient using the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 Palliative Care (QLQ C15PAL) questionnaire from the patient, assessing the Caregiver Burden using Zarit Burden Interview, assessing the QOL of the caregiver using the WHO QOL BREF Questionnaire, in a single session during their routine follow-up in the Palliative Care Clinic of our institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We noticed a statistically significant negative (Spearman) correlation between the Caregiver Burden as assessed by Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) and the psychological (r = -0.302, <i>P</i> < 0.01), social (r= -0.498, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and environmental (r = -0.396, <i>P</i> < 0.01) domains of the WHO QOL BREF Questionnaire. Caregiving Burden as assessed ZBI total score was noted to have a statistically significant negative correlation with physical functioning (r = -0.37, <i>P</i> < 0.01), emotional functioning (r = -0.435, <i>P</i> < 0.01) and global QOL scores (r = -0.499, <i>P</i> < 0.01) assessed from the patient using the EORTC QLQ C15 PAL questionnaire. It also had a statistically significant small positive correlation with EORTC QLQ C15 PAL symptom scores, such as dyspnoea, insomnia, constipation, nausea, fatigue and pain. The median caregiver burden score was 39, showing higher burden as compared to previous studies. Caregivers who were spouses of the patient, illiterate, homemakers, with low-income families reported higher burden.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A high perceived caregiving burden is associated with impaired QOL in family caregivers of advanced cancer patients on best supportive care. Multiple patient related factors and demographic factors tend to affect burden of the caregiver.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Palliative Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ad/2d/IJPC-29-089.PMC9945025.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/IJPC_175_2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/IJPC_175_2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:在印度,患有不治之症的晚期癌症患者通常由家人照顾。缺乏关于印度患者和护理人员的护理人员负担、生活质量(QOL)的数据,尤其是在没有任何肿瘤管理的癌症患者中。材料和方法:我们对220名晚期癌症患者及其各自的220名家庭护理人员进行了一项关于最佳支持性护理的横断面研究。我们的主要目的是确定护理人员负担和生活质量之间的相关性。在获得患者和护理人员的知情同意后,我们使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)生活质量问卷核心15姑息治疗(QLQ C15PAL)问卷评估患者的生活质量,使用Zarit负担访谈评估护理人员负担,在我们机构的姑息治疗诊所进行常规随访期间,使用世界卫生组织生活质量BREF问卷对护理人员的生活质量进行评估。结果:我们注意到Zarit Burden访谈(ZBI)评估的护理人员负担与世界卫生组织生活质量BREF问卷的心理(r=-0.302,P<0.01)、社会(r=-0.498,P<0.01)和环境(r=-0.396,P<0.01。注意到护理负担作为评估的ZBI总分与使用EORTC QLQ C15 PAL问卷评估的患者的身体功能(r=-0.37,P<0.01)、情绪功能(r=-0.1435,P<0.01)和整体生活质量分数(r=-0.499,P<0.01)具有统计学上显著的负相关。它与EORTC QLQ C15 PAL症状评分(如呼吸困难、失眠、便秘、恶心、疲劳和疼痛)也有统计学意义的小正相关。护理人员负担得分中位数为39,显示与先前研究相比负担更高。据报告,低收入家庭的照顾者是病人、文盲、家庭主妇的配偶,负担更高。结论:在接受最佳支持性护理的晚期癌症患者的家庭护理人员中,高感知护理负担与生活质量受损有关。多种患者相关因素和人口统计因素往往会影响护理人员的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Correlation between Quality of Life and Burden in Caregivers of Advanced Stage Cancer Patients on Best Supportive Care.

Objectives: Patients with advanced cancer with incurable diseases are generally cared for by their families in India. There is a lack of data on the perceived caregiver burden, quality of life (QOL) of patients and caregivers in India, especially among cancer patients not on any oncologic management.

Material and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study among 220 patients of advanced cancer on best supportive care and their respective 220 family caregivers. Our primary objective was to identify a correlation between caregiver burden and QOL. After taking informed consent from both patients and caregivers, we assessed the QOL of the patient using the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 Palliative Care (QLQ C15PAL) questionnaire from the patient, assessing the Caregiver Burden using Zarit Burden Interview, assessing the QOL of the caregiver using the WHO QOL BREF Questionnaire, in a single session during their routine follow-up in the Palliative Care Clinic of our institution.

Results: We noticed a statistically significant negative (Spearman) correlation between the Caregiver Burden as assessed by Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) and the psychological (r = -0.302, P < 0.01), social (r= -0.498, P < 0.01) and environmental (r = -0.396, P < 0.01) domains of the WHO QOL BREF Questionnaire. Caregiving Burden as assessed ZBI total score was noted to have a statistically significant negative correlation with physical functioning (r = -0.37, P < 0.01), emotional functioning (r = -0.435, P < 0.01) and global QOL scores (r = -0.499, P < 0.01) assessed from the patient using the EORTC QLQ C15 PAL questionnaire. It also had a statistically significant small positive correlation with EORTC QLQ C15 PAL symptom scores, such as dyspnoea, insomnia, constipation, nausea, fatigue and pain. The median caregiver burden score was 39, showing higher burden as compared to previous studies. Caregivers who were spouses of the patient, illiterate, homemakers, with low-income families reported higher burden.

Conclusion: A high perceived caregiving burden is associated with impaired QOL in family caregivers of advanced cancer patients on best supportive care. Multiple patient related factors and demographic factors tend to affect burden of the caregiver.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Palliative Care
Indian Journal of Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: Welcome to the website of the Indian Journal of Palliative Care. You have free full text access to recent issues of the journal. The links connect you to •guidelines and systematic reviews in palliative care and oncology •a directory of palliative care programmes in India and IAPC membership •Palliative Care Formulary, book reviews and other educational material •guidance on statistical tests and medical writing.
期刊最新文献
Debunking Palliative Care Myths: Assessing the Performance of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots (ChatGPT vs. Google Gemini) Improving Palliative Care Research Reporting: A Guide to Reporting Guidelines Quality of Life Determinants among Breast Cancer Women Undergoing Treatment in Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Study Physicians’ Perceived Barriers and Willingness to Initiate Advance Care Planning with Young Adults Living with Cardiometabolic Diseases A Multicentric Field Test to Study the Validity and Feasibility of the SHS-tool to Screen for Serious Health-related Suffering in Adult Patients with Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1