【告知患者替代治疗“剖宫产”的五个法律陷阱】。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-28 DOI:10.1055/a-2071-9884
Johannes Brocks
{"title":"【告知患者替代治疗“剖宫产”的五个法律陷阱】。","authors":"Johannes Brocks","doi":"10.1055/a-2071-9884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As is well known, claims for damages in birth injury law can arise not only from treatment errors, but also from incorrect information provided to the pregnant woman. The accusation that the possibility of a C-section was not explained, not explained sufficiently, or not explained in time plays an important role here. The accusation is practically significant because it is very often raised in birth injury disputes and is not infrequently successful. In practice, the same information errors that can lead to liability occur time and again.</p>","PeriodicalId":23854,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Five Legal Pitfalls in Informing Patients About the Treatment Alternative \\\"Ceasarean Sectio\\\"].\",\"authors\":\"Johannes Brocks\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2071-9884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As is well known, claims for damages in birth injury law can arise not only from treatment errors, but also from incorrect information provided to the pregnant woman. The accusation that the possibility of a C-section was not explained, not explained sufficiently, or not explained in time plays an important role here. The accusation is practically significant because it is very often raised in birth injury disputes and is not infrequently successful. In practice, the same information errors that can lead to liability occur time and again.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2071-9884\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2071-9884","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

众所周知,在生育伤害法中,损害赔偿的索赔不仅可能因治疗错误而产生,也可能因向孕妇提供了不正确的信息而产生。有人指责说,剖腹产的可能性没有得到解释,解释得不够充分,或者解释得不够及时,这在这里起了重要作用。这一指控具有实际意义,因为它经常在出生伤害纠纷中提出,而且屡屡成功。在实践中,可能导致责任的相同信息错误一次又一次地发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Five Legal Pitfalls in Informing Patients About the Treatment Alternative "Ceasarean Sectio"].

As is well known, claims for damages in birth injury law can arise not only from treatment errors, but also from incorrect information provided to the pregnant woman. The accusation that the possibility of a C-section was not explained, not explained sufficiently, or not explained in time plays an important role here. The accusation is practically significant because it is very often raised in birth injury disputes and is not infrequently successful. In practice, the same information errors that can lead to liability occur time and again.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie
Zeitschrift fur Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gynäkologen, Geburtshelfer, Hebammen, Neonatologen, Pädiater
期刊最新文献
Intrapericardial Teratoma and Associated 3q29 Deletion in a Fetus: Case Report. Evaluation of Ophthalmic Artery Doppler Parameters in Preeclamptic and Normotensive Pregnant Women. [Pneumonia due to Mycoplasma hominis in a Full-Term Newborn - A Case Report with Literature Review]. ["Who cares about us?" Results of a cross-sectional study on the psychosocial health of obstetricians and midwives after traumatic birth experiences]. [Legal Compliance of Medical Information in the Case of a Relatively Indicated Secondary Caesarean Section in Obstetric Clinics in Germany - Part II: New Information Concept].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1