内镜下支架置入术治疗大肠癌左侧恶性大肠梗阻:病理分期评价。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Digestive Surgery Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000528181
Yoon Oh, Sunseok Yoon, Sun Gyo Lim, Seung Yeop Oh
{"title":"内镜下支架置入术治疗大肠癌左侧恶性大肠梗阻:病理分期评价。","authors":"Yoon Oh,&nbsp;Sunseok Yoon,&nbsp;Sun Gyo Lim,&nbsp;Seung Yeop Oh","doi":"10.1159/000528181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) are widely used in patients with malignant left-sided large-bowel obstruction (MLLO) to convert an emergency situation into an elective one. However, the effects of endoscopic stenting on oncological outcomes remain unclear. This study aimed to analyze the oncological outcomes of SEMS placement in patients with MLLO stratified by pathological stage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the data of patients with MLLO that were prospectively collected between January 2005 and December 2016. Patients were divided into those who underwent SEMS placement as a bridge to surgery and those who underwent emergency surgery. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between groups, and their prognostic factors were determined by pathological stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SEMS placement and emergency surgery were performed in 130 and 45 patients, respectively. There was no difference in the 5-year DFS and OS rate between two groups. Subgroup analysis revealed a significant difference in the 5-year DFS and OS rate in patients with stage III MLLO, but was not observed in patients with stage II MLLO. Multivariate Cox regression analysis for stage III MLLO revealed endoscopic stenting (hazard ratio [HR], 2.051; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.018-4.131; p = 0.044) as the only prognostic factor for DFS. Age, tumor differentiation, perineural invasion, and endoscopic stenting (HR, 3.189; 95% CI, 1.346-7.556; p = 0.008) were prognostic factors for OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In terms of oncologic outcomes, endoscopic stenting might be more beneficial than ES in patients with stage III MLLO.</p>","PeriodicalId":11241,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Surgery","volume":"39 5-6","pages":"242-249"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic Stenting for Malignant Left-Sided Large-Bowel Obstruction in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: Evaluation according to Pathological Stage.\",\"authors\":\"Yoon Oh,&nbsp;Sunseok Yoon,&nbsp;Sun Gyo Lim,&nbsp;Seung Yeop Oh\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000528181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) are widely used in patients with malignant left-sided large-bowel obstruction (MLLO) to convert an emergency situation into an elective one. However, the effects of endoscopic stenting on oncological outcomes remain unclear. This study aimed to analyze the oncological outcomes of SEMS placement in patients with MLLO stratified by pathological stage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the data of patients with MLLO that were prospectively collected between January 2005 and December 2016. Patients were divided into those who underwent SEMS placement as a bridge to surgery and those who underwent emergency surgery. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between groups, and their prognostic factors were determined by pathological stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SEMS placement and emergency surgery were performed in 130 and 45 patients, respectively. There was no difference in the 5-year DFS and OS rate between two groups. Subgroup analysis revealed a significant difference in the 5-year DFS and OS rate in patients with stage III MLLO, but was not observed in patients with stage II MLLO. Multivariate Cox regression analysis for stage III MLLO revealed endoscopic stenting (hazard ratio [HR], 2.051; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.018-4.131; p = 0.044) as the only prognostic factor for DFS. Age, tumor differentiation, perineural invasion, and endoscopic stenting (HR, 3.189; 95% CI, 1.346-7.556; p = 0.008) were prognostic factors for OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In terms of oncologic outcomes, endoscopic stenting might be more beneficial than ES in patients with stage III MLLO.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"39 5-6\",\"pages\":\"242-249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000528181\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000528181","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自膨胀金属支架(SEMSs)广泛应用于恶性左侧大肠梗阻(MLLO)患者,将紧急情况转化为选择性情况。然而,内镜支架置入术对肿瘤预后的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在分析按病理分期分层放置SEMS的MLLO患者的肿瘤学结果。方法:回顾2005年1月至2016年12月前瞻性收集的MLLO患者资料。患者被分为两组,一组接受SEMS安置作为手术的桥梁,另一组接受紧急手术。比较两组间无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS),并根据病理分期确定预后因素。结果:分别对130例和45例患者进行了SEMS安置和急诊手术。两组患者的5年DFS和OS率无差异。亚组分析显示,III期MLLO患者的5年DFS和OS率有显著差异,但在II期MLLO患者中未观察到。多因素Cox回归分析显示III期MLLO患者需要内镜支架植入术(风险比[HR], 2.051;95%置信区间[CI], 1.018-4.131;p = 0.044)作为DFS的唯一预后因素。年龄、肿瘤分化、神经周围侵犯和内镜支架植入术(HR, 3.189;95% ci, 1.346-7.556;p = 0.008)为OS的预后因素。结论:在肿瘤预后方面,内镜下支架置入可能比ES更有利于III期MLLO患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endoscopic Stenting for Malignant Left-Sided Large-Bowel Obstruction in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: Evaluation according to Pathological Stage.

Introduction: Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) are widely used in patients with malignant left-sided large-bowel obstruction (MLLO) to convert an emergency situation into an elective one. However, the effects of endoscopic stenting on oncological outcomes remain unclear. This study aimed to analyze the oncological outcomes of SEMS placement in patients with MLLO stratified by pathological stage.

Methods: We reviewed the data of patients with MLLO that were prospectively collected between January 2005 and December 2016. Patients were divided into those who underwent SEMS placement as a bridge to surgery and those who underwent emergency surgery. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between groups, and their prognostic factors were determined by pathological stage.

Results: SEMS placement and emergency surgery were performed in 130 and 45 patients, respectively. There was no difference in the 5-year DFS and OS rate between two groups. Subgroup analysis revealed a significant difference in the 5-year DFS and OS rate in patients with stage III MLLO, but was not observed in patients with stage II MLLO. Multivariate Cox regression analysis for stage III MLLO revealed endoscopic stenting (hazard ratio [HR], 2.051; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.018-4.131; p = 0.044) as the only prognostic factor for DFS. Age, tumor differentiation, perineural invasion, and endoscopic stenting (HR, 3.189; 95% CI, 1.346-7.556; p = 0.008) were prognostic factors for OS.

Conclusion: In terms of oncologic outcomes, endoscopic stenting might be more beneficial than ES in patients with stage III MLLO.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Surgery
Digestive Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
25
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: ''Digestive Surgery'' presents a comprehensive overview in the field of gastrointestinal surgery. Interdisciplinary in scope, the journal keeps the specialist aware of advances in all fields that contribute to improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal disease. Particular emphasis is given to articles that evaluate not only recent clinical developments, especially clinical trials and technical innovations such as new endoscopic and laparoscopic procedures, but also relevant translational research. Each contribution is carefully aligned with the need of the digestive surgeon. Thus, the journal is an important component of the continuing medical education of surgeons who want their practice to benefit from a familiarity with new knowledge in all its dimensions.
期刊最新文献
Impact of early oral feeding on postoperative outcomes after elective colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Delayed return of gastrointestinal function after partial hepatectomy: a single-center cross-sectional study. Feasibility of telementoring during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy. Anatomical variants of the jejunal veins and their technical implications in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Advantage of Postoperative Inflammatory Status after Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1