数字光处理(DLP)投影仪刺激视觉电生理的评估。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Documenta Ophthalmologica Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1007/s10633-022-09917-4
Oliver R Marmoy, Dorothy A Thompson
{"title":"数字光处理(DLP)投影仪刺激视觉电生理的评估。","authors":"Oliver R Marmoy,&nbsp;Dorothy A Thompson","doi":"10.1007/s10633-022-09917-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Visual electrophysiology tests require the use of precise and calibrated visual display units (VDUs). Existing VDUs for presenting structured stimuli are now mostly obsolete, with modern solutions limited or unsuitable for clinical testing. Digital light processing (DLP) laser projectors have recently become commercially available and this study aimed to assess their suitability as VDUs for visual electrophysiology testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study consisted of two sections. The first was a photometric study of two DLP laser projectors (Viewsonic LS831WU and HiSense 100L5FTUK) to assess luminance, contrast, spectral and temporal characteristics of the stimulus. The second was a physiological study comparing pattern electroretinograms (PERG) and visual evoked potentials (PVEPs) amplitudes and peak-times recorded using a DLP laser projector, photometrically and spatially matched to existing plasma VDUs at our institution (Pioneer Electronics Corporation, PDP422MXE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Viewsonic DLP laser projector was capable of high luminance levels (0-587.5 cd/m<sup>2</sup>) whilst maintaining contrast above 93%. The temporal properties showed fast rise and fall times of 0.5-1 ms and 0.5-1 ms, respectively, without any transient luminance change with reversals. The device required a warm-up time of at least 2 min until reaching near maximal luminance. The second (Hisense) device was observed to have a detrimental input lag jitter so was not used for any further analysis. PERGs and PVEPs showed high agreement and correlation (r = 0.766-0.905) between the Viewsonic DLP device and existing plasma VDUs. No significant differences were observed for P50 and P100 peak-time (p =  > 0.05), however P50, N95 and P100 amplitudes were all significantly larger for the DLP device (p =  < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The DLP laser projector tested in this study is a viable and practical replacement VDU for clinical electrophysiology tests of vision. The device is easily capable of meeting ISCEV standards, and showed PERG and PVEP amplitudes larger than existing systems despite photometric and spatial matching. The DLP laser projectors are capable of very large field sizes so are beneficial for paediatric testing or those wishing to examine large field responses. Importantly, it was observed that some devices may suffer input lag jitter, therefore, individual calibration and assessment of DLP projection systems is an important consideration before clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11207,"journal":{"name":"Documenta Ophthalmologica","volume":"146 2","pages":"151-163"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10082110/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of digital light processing (DLP) projector stimulators for visual electrophysiology.\",\"authors\":\"Oliver R Marmoy,&nbsp;Dorothy A Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10633-022-09917-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Visual electrophysiology tests require the use of precise and calibrated visual display units (VDUs). Existing VDUs for presenting structured stimuli are now mostly obsolete, with modern solutions limited or unsuitable for clinical testing. Digital light processing (DLP) laser projectors have recently become commercially available and this study aimed to assess their suitability as VDUs for visual electrophysiology testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study consisted of two sections. The first was a photometric study of two DLP laser projectors (Viewsonic LS831WU and HiSense 100L5FTUK) to assess luminance, contrast, spectral and temporal characteristics of the stimulus. The second was a physiological study comparing pattern electroretinograms (PERG) and visual evoked potentials (PVEPs) amplitudes and peak-times recorded using a DLP laser projector, photometrically and spatially matched to existing plasma VDUs at our institution (Pioneer Electronics Corporation, PDP422MXE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Viewsonic DLP laser projector was capable of high luminance levels (0-587.5 cd/m<sup>2</sup>) whilst maintaining contrast above 93%. The temporal properties showed fast rise and fall times of 0.5-1 ms and 0.5-1 ms, respectively, without any transient luminance change with reversals. The device required a warm-up time of at least 2 min until reaching near maximal luminance. The second (Hisense) device was observed to have a detrimental input lag jitter so was not used for any further analysis. PERGs and PVEPs showed high agreement and correlation (r = 0.766-0.905) between the Viewsonic DLP device and existing plasma VDUs. No significant differences were observed for P50 and P100 peak-time (p =  > 0.05), however P50, N95 and P100 amplitudes were all significantly larger for the DLP device (p =  < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The DLP laser projector tested in this study is a viable and practical replacement VDU for clinical electrophysiology tests of vision. The device is easily capable of meeting ISCEV standards, and showed PERG and PVEP amplitudes larger than existing systems despite photometric and spatial matching. The DLP laser projectors are capable of very large field sizes so are beneficial for paediatric testing or those wishing to examine large field responses. Importantly, it was observed that some devices may suffer input lag jitter, therefore, individual calibration and assessment of DLP projection systems is an important consideration before clinical implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Documenta Ophthalmologica\",\"volume\":\"146 2\",\"pages\":\"151-163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10082110/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Documenta Ophthalmologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-022-09917-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Documenta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-022-09917-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

视觉电生理测试需要使用精确和校准的视觉显示单元(vdu)。现有的用于呈现结构化刺激的vdu现在大多已经过时,现代解决方案有限或不适合临床试验。数字光处理(DLP)激光投影仪最近已商品化,本研究旨在评估其作为视觉电生理测试的vdu的适用性。方法:本研究分为两部分。首先是对两台DLP激光投影仪(Viewsonic LS831WU和海信100L5FTUK)进行光度研究,以评估刺激的亮度、对比度、光谱和时间特性。第二项是生理研究,比较了使用DLP激光投影仪记录的模式视网膜电图(PERG)和视觉诱发电位(PVEPs)振幅和峰值时间,在光度和空间上与我们机构现有的等离子体vdu (Pioneer Electronics Corporation, PDP422MXE)相匹配。结果:Viewsonic DLP激光投影仪能够实现高亮度水平(0-587.5 cd/m2),同时保持93%以上的对比度。时间特性显示出快速上升和下降时间分别为0.5-1 ms和0.5-1 ms,没有任何瞬态亮度变化。该设备需要至少2分钟的预热时间,直到达到接近最大亮度。第二个(海信)设备被观察到有一个有害的输入滞后抖动,所以没有用于任何进一步的分析。PERGs和PVEPs在Viewsonic DLP装置和现有等离子体vdu之间表现出高度的一致性和相关性(r = 0.766-0.905)。P50和P100峰值时间无显著性差异(p = > 0.05),但DLP设备的P50、N95和P100振幅均显著较大(p =讨论:本研究测试的DLP激光投影仪是临床视觉电生理测试中可行的实用替代VDU。该装置很容易满足ISCEV标准,并且显示出比现有系统更大的PERG和PVEP振幅,尽管光度和空间匹配。DLP激光投影仪能够非常大的场尺寸,因此对儿科测试或希望检查大场响应的人有益。重要的是,我们观察到一些设备可能会出现输入滞后抖动,因此,在临床实施DLP投影系统之前,对DLP投影系统进行单独校准和评估是一个重要的考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of digital light processing (DLP) projector stimulators for visual electrophysiology.

Introduction: Visual electrophysiology tests require the use of precise and calibrated visual display units (VDUs). Existing VDUs for presenting structured stimuli are now mostly obsolete, with modern solutions limited or unsuitable for clinical testing. Digital light processing (DLP) laser projectors have recently become commercially available and this study aimed to assess their suitability as VDUs for visual electrophysiology testing.

Methods: This study consisted of two sections. The first was a photometric study of two DLP laser projectors (Viewsonic LS831WU and HiSense 100L5FTUK) to assess luminance, contrast, spectral and temporal characteristics of the stimulus. The second was a physiological study comparing pattern electroretinograms (PERG) and visual evoked potentials (PVEPs) amplitudes and peak-times recorded using a DLP laser projector, photometrically and spatially matched to existing plasma VDUs at our institution (Pioneer Electronics Corporation, PDP422MXE).

Results: The Viewsonic DLP laser projector was capable of high luminance levels (0-587.5 cd/m2) whilst maintaining contrast above 93%. The temporal properties showed fast rise and fall times of 0.5-1 ms and 0.5-1 ms, respectively, without any transient luminance change with reversals. The device required a warm-up time of at least 2 min until reaching near maximal luminance. The second (Hisense) device was observed to have a detrimental input lag jitter so was not used for any further analysis. PERGs and PVEPs showed high agreement and correlation (r = 0.766-0.905) between the Viewsonic DLP device and existing plasma VDUs. No significant differences were observed for P50 and P100 peak-time (p =  > 0.05), however P50, N95 and P100 amplitudes were all significantly larger for the DLP device (p =  < 0.05).

Discussion: The DLP laser projector tested in this study is a viable and practical replacement VDU for clinical electrophysiology tests of vision. The device is easily capable of meeting ISCEV standards, and showed PERG and PVEP amplitudes larger than existing systems despite photometric and spatial matching. The DLP laser projectors are capable of very large field sizes so are beneficial for paediatric testing or those wishing to examine large field responses. Importantly, it was observed that some devices may suffer input lag jitter, therefore, individual calibration and assessment of DLP projection systems is an important consideration before clinical implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Documenta Ophthalmologica
Documenta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
21.40%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Documenta Ophthalmologica is an official publication of the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision. The purpose of the journal is to promote the understanding and application of clinical electrophysiology of vision. Documenta Ophthalmologica will publish reviews, research articles, technical notes, brief reports and case studies which inform the readers about basic and clinical sciences related to visual electrodiagnosis and means to improve diagnosis and clinical management of patients using visual electrophysiology. Studies may involve animals or humans. In either case appropriate care must be taken to follow the Declaration of Helsinki for human subject or appropriate humane standards of animal care (e.g., the ARVO standards on Animal Care and Use).
期刊最新文献
Screening electro-oculography protocol as a part of full-field electroretinography. Special issue on pupil function: trends and advances in technology and understanding and proceedings of the 34th international pupil colloquium, L V Prasad eye institute, Hyderabad, India. An unexpected retained metallic intraocular foreign body. A modified analysis protocol for the PhNR test. Vitamin A deficiency retinopathy in the setting of celiac disease and liver fibrosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1