老年与高龄SARS-COV2住院患者临床特征比较

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Acta Clinica Belgica Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1080/17843286.2022.2102115
Sylwia Szklarzewska, Justine Vande Walle, Sandra De Breucker, Didier Schoevaerdts
{"title":"老年与高龄SARS-COV2住院患者临床特征比较","authors":"Sylwia Szklarzewska,&nbsp;Justine Vande Walle,&nbsp;Sandra De Breucker,&nbsp;Didier Schoevaerdts","doi":"10.1080/17843286.2022.2102115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Oldest-old patients may have an unusual SARS-COV2 presentation that can jeopardise diagnosis and management. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of oldest-old (≥85 years) and old patients (75-85 years) admitted with COVID-19 to Belgian hospitals during the first wave of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicentre, retrospective, observational study in ten Belgian hospitals. We reviewed the electronic clinical records of patients ≥75 years hospitalised with COVID-19 from March to June 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 986 patients were placed on the register (old group: n = 507; oldest-old group: n = 479). Before hospitalisation, the oldest-old (OO) group presented with more geriatric syndromes including comorbidities, frailty, falls, cognitive impairment, and incontinence. At admission, the OO group presented with less cough, less headache, and less fever but significantly more delirium than old (O) group. Members of the OO group were admitted less frequently to intensive care units (ICUs). A geriatrician was consulted to help in the decision-making process more often for the OO group. The global mortality of the cohort was 47%, with no difference between the two groups. Patients in the OO group were more often institutionalised after hospitalisation and less often referred for rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The OO patients presented with more geriatric syndromes that make them vulnerable to dependence and institutionalisation after a hospital stay, without having a higher mortality rate than O patients. Geriatrician expertise is necessary in the management of frail older patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7086,"journal":{"name":"Acta Clinica Belgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of clinical characteristics between old and oldest-old patients hospitalised for SARS-COV2.\",\"authors\":\"Sylwia Szklarzewska,&nbsp;Justine Vande Walle,&nbsp;Sandra De Breucker,&nbsp;Didier Schoevaerdts\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17843286.2022.2102115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Oldest-old patients may have an unusual SARS-COV2 presentation that can jeopardise diagnosis and management. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of oldest-old (≥85 years) and old patients (75-85 years) admitted with COVID-19 to Belgian hospitals during the first wave of the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicentre, retrospective, observational study in ten Belgian hospitals. We reviewed the electronic clinical records of patients ≥75 years hospitalised with COVID-19 from March to June 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 986 patients were placed on the register (old group: n = 507; oldest-old group: n = 479). Before hospitalisation, the oldest-old (OO) group presented with more geriatric syndromes including comorbidities, frailty, falls, cognitive impairment, and incontinence. At admission, the OO group presented with less cough, less headache, and less fever but significantly more delirium than old (O) group. Members of the OO group were admitted less frequently to intensive care units (ICUs). A geriatrician was consulted to help in the decision-making process more often for the OO group. The global mortality of the cohort was 47%, with no difference between the two groups. Patients in the OO group were more often institutionalised after hospitalisation and less often referred for rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The OO patients presented with more geriatric syndromes that make them vulnerable to dependence and institutionalisation after a hospital stay, without having a higher mortality rate than O patients. Geriatrician expertise is necessary in the management of frail older patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Clinica Belgica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Clinica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2022.2102115\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Clinica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2022.2102115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:老年患者可能有不寻常的SARS-COV2表现,这可能危及诊断和治疗。本研究的目的是比较第一波大流行期间比利时医院收治的最高龄(≥85岁)和老年(75-85岁)COVID-19患者的临床特征和结局。方法:我们在比利时10家医院进行了一项多中心、回顾性、观察性研究。我们回顾了2020年3月至6月住院≥75岁的COVID-19患者的电子临床记录。结果:共有986例患者登记在册(老年组:n = 507;最高龄组:n = 479)。住院前,老年组出现更多老年综合征,包括合并症、虚弱、跌倒、认知障碍和尿失禁。入院时,0岁组咳嗽、头痛、发热均较老年0岁组减少,但谵妄明显增多。OO组成员入住重症监护病房(icu)的频率较低。在OO组的决策过程中,更频繁地咨询了一位老年病专家。该队列的全球死亡率为47%,两组之间没有差异。OO组的患者在住院后更常被送往机构,而较少被转诊进行康复治疗。结论:0例患者表现出更多的老年综合征,使他们在住院后容易依赖和住院,但死亡率不高于0例患者。老年病专家的专业知识对于管理体弱多病的老年病人是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of clinical characteristics between old and oldest-old patients hospitalised for SARS-COV2.

Objectives: Oldest-old patients may have an unusual SARS-COV2 presentation that can jeopardise diagnosis and management. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of oldest-old (≥85 years) and old patients (75-85 years) admitted with COVID-19 to Belgian hospitals during the first wave of the pandemic.

Methods: We conducted a multicentre, retrospective, observational study in ten Belgian hospitals. We reviewed the electronic clinical records of patients ≥75 years hospitalised with COVID-19 from March to June 2020.

Results: A total of 986 patients were placed on the register (old group: n = 507; oldest-old group: n = 479). Before hospitalisation, the oldest-old (OO) group presented with more geriatric syndromes including comorbidities, frailty, falls, cognitive impairment, and incontinence. At admission, the OO group presented with less cough, less headache, and less fever but significantly more delirium than old (O) group. Members of the OO group were admitted less frequently to intensive care units (ICUs). A geriatrician was consulted to help in the decision-making process more often for the OO group. The global mortality of the cohort was 47%, with no difference between the two groups. Patients in the OO group were more often institutionalised after hospitalisation and less often referred for rehabilitation.

Conclusions: The OO patients presented with more geriatric syndromes that make them vulnerable to dependence and institutionalisation after a hospital stay, without having a higher mortality rate than O patients. Geriatrician expertise is necessary in the management of frail older patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Clinica Belgica
Acta Clinica Belgica 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Clinica Belgica: International Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Medicine primarily publishes papers on clinical medicine, clinical chemistry, pathology and molecular biology, provided they describe results which contribute to our understanding of clinical problems or describe new methods applicable to clinical investigation. Readership includes physicians, pathologists, pharmacists and physicians working in non-academic and academic hospitals, practicing internal medicine and its subspecialties.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing hospital emergency response based on the experience of COVID-19. Herpes zoster in Belgium: a new solution to an old problem. Appropriate use of antibiotics for oral/dental conditions in older adults: a narrative review. Systemic sarcoidosis presenting with hypercalcemia, sinusitis and hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction. Comparison of time-to-detection of Mindray TDR and BacT/ALERT®3D blood culture systems using simulated blood cultures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1