Asieh Mozaffari, Donya Hashtbaran, Alireza Moghadam, Shima Aalaei
{"title":"一颗或两颗种植体置换磨牙时种植周骨的应力分布:有限元分析。","authors":"Asieh Mozaffari, Donya Hashtbaran, Alireza Moghadam, Shima Aalaei","doi":"10.30476/dentjods.2022.92584.1659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of the problem: </strong>In most cases, insertion of single implants with a standard diameter is used to replace a molar tooth but placing two implants with a narrow diameter seems to be a viable treatment modality to withstand functional and biomechanical forces.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate and compare stress distribution in the bone surrounding a single molar area rehabilitated by a single implant versus two implants with a narrow diameter.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>The study was conducted by computer-aided <i>in vitro</i> modeling. The initial model used a single implant, 4.8 mm wide in diameter, inserted with a 3.9-mm distance from both sides and 12.6-mm mesiodistal space. The second model used two 3.3-mm narrow-sized implants with a 3-mm distance from one another, 1.5 mm from both sides, and a 12.6-mm mesiodistal space. Following the completion of these models, a 100-N force was exerted obliquely, once in three locations and once in the mesial aspect of the implant-supported crown. Stress distribution was then measured using finite element analysis (FEA) with ANSYS Workbench software package in both models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum stress in the bone around the single implant was less than that around double implants. The maximum stress of cortical bone in three-point loading was lower than mesial loading either in one (146.7 vs. 126.72 MPa) or two implants model (186.8 vs. 139.24).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the results, because of more cortical bone contact area, the stress of surrounding bone in wide implant was decreased.</p>","PeriodicalId":73702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)","volume":"24 1 Suppl","pages":"132-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stress Distribution in Peri-implant Bone in the Replacement of Molars with One or Two Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Asieh Mozaffari, Donya Hashtbaran, Alireza Moghadam, Shima Aalaei\",\"doi\":\"10.30476/dentjods.2022.92584.1659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Statement of the problem: </strong>In most cases, insertion of single implants with a standard diameter is used to replace a molar tooth but placing two implants with a narrow diameter seems to be a viable treatment modality to withstand functional and biomechanical forces.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate and compare stress distribution in the bone surrounding a single molar area rehabilitated by a single implant versus two implants with a narrow diameter.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>The study was conducted by computer-aided <i>in vitro</i> modeling. The initial model used a single implant, 4.8 mm wide in diameter, inserted with a 3.9-mm distance from both sides and 12.6-mm mesiodistal space. The second model used two 3.3-mm narrow-sized implants with a 3-mm distance from one another, 1.5 mm from both sides, and a 12.6-mm mesiodistal space. Following the completion of these models, a 100-N force was exerted obliquely, once in three locations and once in the mesial aspect of the implant-supported crown. Stress distribution was then measured using finite element analysis (FEA) with ANSYS Workbench software package in both models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum stress in the bone around the single implant was less than that around double implants. The maximum stress of cortical bone in three-point loading was lower than mesial loading either in one (146.7 vs. 126.72 MPa) or two implants model (186.8 vs. 139.24).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the results, because of more cortical bone contact area, the stress of surrounding bone in wide implant was decreased.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)\",\"volume\":\"24 1 Suppl\",\"pages\":\"132-137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084560/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30476/dentjods.2022.92584.1659\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/dentjods.2022.92584.1659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
问题陈述:在大多数情况下,使用标准直径的单个种植体来替换臼齿,但放置两个直径较窄的种植体似乎是一种可行的治疗方式,可以承受功能和生物力学力。目的:本研究旨在评估和比较单种植体和双种植体窄直径修复单磨牙区周围骨的应力分布。材料与方法:采用计算机辅助体外模型。初始模型使用单个种植体,直径4.8 mm,距两侧距离3.9 mm,近端间距12.6 mm。第二种模型使用两个3.3 mm窄尺寸的种植体,彼此间距为3mm,两侧间距为1.5 mm,近端间距为12.6 mm。在这些模型完成后,一个100-N的力斜施加,一次在三个位置,一次在种植体支撑冠的内侧。然后利用ANSYS Workbench软件包对两种模型进行有限元分析(FEA)。结果:单种植体周围骨的最大应力小于双种植体周围。无论是单种植体模型(146.7 vs. 126.72 MPa)还是双种植体模型(186.8 vs. 139.24 MPa),三点加载时皮质骨的最大应力均低于中位加载。结论:宽种植体由于皮质骨接触面积大,可降低周围骨的应力。
Stress Distribution in Peri-implant Bone in the Replacement of Molars with One or Two Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.
Statement of the problem: In most cases, insertion of single implants with a standard diameter is used to replace a molar tooth but placing two implants with a narrow diameter seems to be a viable treatment modality to withstand functional and biomechanical forces.
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate and compare stress distribution in the bone surrounding a single molar area rehabilitated by a single implant versus two implants with a narrow diameter.
Materials and method: The study was conducted by computer-aided in vitro modeling. The initial model used a single implant, 4.8 mm wide in diameter, inserted with a 3.9-mm distance from both sides and 12.6-mm mesiodistal space. The second model used two 3.3-mm narrow-sized implants with a 3-mm distance from one another, 1.5 mm from both sides, and a 12.6-mm mesiodistal space. Following the completion of these models, a 100-N force was exerted obliquely, once in three locations and once in the mesial aspect of the implant-supported crown. Stress distribution was then measured using finite element analysis (FEA) with ANSYS Workbench software package in both models.
Results: The maximum stress in the bone around the single implant was less than that around double implants. The maximum stress of cortical bone in three-point loading was lower than mesial loading either in one (146.7 vs. 126.72 MPa) or two implants model (186.8 vs. 139.24).
Conclusion: According to the results, because of more cortical bone contact area, the stress of surrounding bone in wide implant was decreased.