一颗或两颗种植体置换磨牙时种植周骨的应力分布:有限元分析。

Asieh Mozaffari, Donya Hashtbaran, Alireza Moghadam, Shima Aalaei
{"title":"一颗或两颗种植体置换磨牙时种植周骨的应力分布:有限元分析。","authors":"Asieh Mozaffari,&nbsp;Donya Hashtbaran,&nbsp;Alireza Moghadam,&nbsp;Shima Aalaei","doi":"10.30476/dentjods.2022.92584.1659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of the problem: </strong>In most cases, insertion of single implants with a standard diameter is used to replace a molar tooth but placing two implants with a narrow diameter seems to be a viable treatment modality to withstand functional and biomechanical forces.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate and compare stress distribution in the bone surrounding a single molar area rehabilitated by a single implant versus two implants with a narrow diameter.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>The study was conducted by computer-aided <i>in vitro</i> modeling. The initial model used a single implant, 4.8 mm wide in diameter, inserted with a 3.9-mm distance from both sides and 12.6-mm mesiodistal space. The second model used two 3.3-mm narrow-sized implants with a 3-mm distance from one another, 1.5 mm from both sides, and a 12.6-mm mesiodistal space. Following the completion of these models, a 100-N force was exerted obliquely, once in three locations and once in the mesial aspect of the implant-supported crown. Stress distribution was then measured using finite element analysis (FEA) with ANSYS Workbench software package in both models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum stress in the bone around the single implant was less than that around double implants. The maximum stress of cortical bone in three-point loading was lower than mesial loading either in one (146.7 vs. 126.72 MPa) or two implants model (186.8 vs. 139.24).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the results, because of more cortical bone contact area, the stress of surrounding bone in wide implant was decreased.</p>","PeriodicalId":73702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)","volume":"24 1 Suppl","pages":"132-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stress Distribution in Peri-implant Bone in the Replacement of Molars with One or Two Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Asieh Mozaffari,&nbsp;Donya Hashtbaran,&nbsp;Alireza Moghadam,&nbsp;Shima Aalaei\",\"doi\":\"10.30476/dentjods.2022.92584.1659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Statement of the problem: </strong>In most cases, insertion of single implants with a standard diameter is used to replace a molar tooth but placing two implants with a narrow diameter seems to be a viable treatment modality to withstand functional and biomechanical forces.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate and compare stress distribution in the bone surrounding a single molar area rehabilitated by a single implant versus two implants with a narrow diameter.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>The study was conducted by computer-aided <i>in vitro</i> modeling. The initial model used a single implant, 4.8 mm wide in diameter, inserted with a 3.9-mm distance from both sides and 12.6-mm mesiodistal space. The second model used two 3.3-mm narrow-sized implants with a 3-mm distance from one another, 1.5 mm from both sides, and a 12.6-mm mesiodistal space. Following the completion of these models, a 100-N force was exerted obliquely, once in three locations and once in the mesial aspect of the implant-supported crown. Stress distribution was then measured using finite element analysis (FEA) with ANSYS Workbench software package in both models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum stress in the bone around the single implant was less than that around double implants. The maximum stress of cortical bone in three-point loading was lower than mesial loading either in one (146.7 vs. 126.72 MPa) or two implants model (186.8 vs. 139.24).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the results, because of more cortical bone contact area, the stress of surrounding bone in wide implant was decreased.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)\",\"volume\":\"24 1 Suppl\",\"pages\":\"132-137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10084560/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30476/dentjods.2022.92584.1659\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/dentjods.2022.92584.1659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题陈述:在大多数情况下,使用标准直径的单个种植体来替换臼齿,但放置两个直径较窄的种植体似乎是一种可行的治疗方式,可以承受功能和生物力学力。目的:本研究旨在评估和比较单种植体和双种植体窄直径修复单磨牙区周围骨的应力分布。材料与方法:采用计算机辅助体外模型。初始模型使用单个种植体,直径4.8 mm,距两侧距离3.9 mm,近端间距12.6 mm。第二种模型使用两个3.3 mm窄尺寸的种植体,彼此间距为3mm,两侧间距为1.5 mm,近端间距为12.6 mm。在这些模型完成后,一个100-N的力斜施加,一次在三个位置,一次在种植体支撑冠的内侧。然后利用ANSYS Workbench软件包对两种模型进行有限元分析(FEA)。结果:单种植体周围骨的最大应力小于双种植体周围。无论是单种植体模型(146.7 vs. 126.72 MPa)还是双种植体模型(186.8 vs. 139.24 MPa),三点加载时皮质骨的最大应力均低于中位加载。结论:宽种植体由于皮质骨接触面积大,可降低周围骨的应力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stress Distribution in Peri-implant Bone in the Replacement of Molars with One or Two Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.

Statement of the problem: In most cases, insertion of single implants with a standard diameter is used to replace a molar tooth but placing two implants with a narrow diameter seems to be a viable treatment modality to withstand functional and biomechanical forces.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate and compare stress distribution in the bone surrounding a single molar area rehabilitated by a single implant versus two implants with a narrow diameter.

Materials and method: The study was conducted by computer-aided in vitro modeling. The initial model used a single implant, 4.8 mm wide in diameter, inserted with a 3.9-mm distance from both sides and 12.6-mm mesiodistal space. The second model used two 3.3-mm narrow-sized implants with a 3-mm distance from one another, 1.5 mm from both sides, and a 12.6-mm mesiodistal space. Following the completion of these models, a 100-N force was exerted obliquely, once in three locations and once in the mesial aspect of the implant-supported crown. Stress distribution was then measured using finite element analysis (FEA) with ANSYS Workbench software package in both models.

Results: The maximum stress in the bone around the single implant was less than that around double implants. The maximum stress of cortical bone in three-point loading was lower than mesial loading either in one (146.7 vs. 126.72 MPa) or two implants model (186.8 vs. 139.24).

Conclusion: According to the results, because of more cortical bone contact area, the stress of surrounding bone in wide implant was decreased.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cytotoxic Effects of Pulp Capping Agents on Mesenchymal Stem Cells Isolated from Human Exfoliated Deciduous Teeth. Dentition Type as a Determinant of Microbial Load Reduction by Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy in Deep Dentin Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Effect of Cold Plasma on the Penetration Depth of AH26 and Beta Resin Sealers in Dentinal Tubules. Emergency Medications and Equipment Indispensable for Dental Offices and Clinics in Iran. Evaluation of the Effect of Applying Chitosan, Neem, Tulsi, Aloe vera, and Chlorhexidine Solutions on the Shear Bond Strength of Composite to Dentin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1