Garden型和II型老年股骨颈骨折矢状面畸形常被侧位x线片错误分类。

Madeline S Tiee, Andrew G Golz, Andrew Kim, Joseph B Cohen, Hobie D Summers, Anup J Alexander, William D Lack
{"title":"Garden型和II型老年股骨颈骨折矢状面畸形常被侧位x线片错误分类。","authors":"Madeline S Tiee,&nbsp;Andrew G Golz,&nbsp;Andrew Kim,&nbsp;Joseph B Cohen,&nbsp;Hobie D Summers,&nbsp;Anup J Alexander,&nbsp;William D Lack","doi":"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to determine the validity and inter-rater reliability of radiographic assessment of sagittal deformity of femoral neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Level 1 trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patients/participants: </strong>Thirty-one patients 65 years or older who sustained low-energy, Garden type I/II femoral neck fractures imaged with biplanar radiographs and either computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging were included.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measurements: </strong>Preoperative sagittal tilt was measured on lateral radiographs and compared with the tilt identified on advanced imaging. Fractures were defined as \"high-risk\" if posterior tilt was ≥20 degrees or anterior tilt was >10 degrees.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 31 Garden type I/II femoral neck fractures, advanced imaging identified 10 high-risk fractures including 8 (25.8%) with posterior tilt ≥20 degrees and 2 (6.5%) with anterior tilt >10 degrees. Overall, there was no significant difference between sagittal tilt measured using lateral radiographs and advanced imaging (<i>P</i> = 0.84), and the 3 raters had good agreement between their measurements of sagittal tilt on lateral radiographs (interclass correlation coefficient 0.79, 95% confidence interval [0.65, 0.88], <i>P</i> < 0.01). However, for high-risk fractures, radiographic measurements from lateral radiographs alone resulted in greater variability and underestimation of tilt by 5.2 degrees (95% confidence interval [-18.68, 8.28]) when compared with computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. Owing to this underestimation of sagittal tilt, the raters misclassified high-risk fractures as \"low-risk\" in most cases (averaging 6.3 of 10, 63%, range 6 - 7) when using lateral radiographs while low-risk fractures were rarely misclassified as high-risk (averaging 1.7 of 21, 7.9%, range 1 - 3, <i>P</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lateral radiographs frequently lead surgeons to misclassify high-risk sagittal tilt of low-energy femoral neck fractures as low-risk. Further research is necessary to improve the assessment of sagittal plane deformity for these injuries.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV diagnostic study.</p>","PeriodicalId":74381,"journal":{"name":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","volume":"6 2","pages":"e273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f6/e7/oi9-6-e273.PMC10113109.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sagittal deformity of Garden type I and II geriatric femoral neck fractures is frequently misclassified by lateral radiographs.\",\"authors\":\"Madeline S Tiee,&nbsp;Andrew G Golz,&nbsp;Andrew Kim,&nbsp;Joseph B Cohen,&nbsp;Hobie D Summers,&nbsp;Anup J Alexander,&nbsp;William D Lack\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/OI9.0000000000000273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of this study was to determine the validity and inter-rater reliability of radiographic assessment of sagittal deformity of femoral neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Level 1 trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patients/participants: </strong>Thirty-one patients 65 years or older who sustained low-energy, Garden type I/II femoral neck fractures imaged with biplanar radiographs and either computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging were included.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measurements: </strong>Preoperative sagittal tilt was measured on lateral radiographs and compared with the tilt identified on advanced imaging. Fractures were defined as \\\"high-risk\\\" if posterior tilt was ≥20 degrees or anterior tilt was >10 degrees.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 31 Garden type I/II femoral neck fractures, advanced imaging identified 10 high-risk fractures including 8 (25.8%) with posterior tilt ≥20 degrees and 2 (6.5%) with anterior tilt >10 degrees. Overall, there was no significant difference between sagittal tilt measured using lateral radiographs and advanced imaging (<i>P</i> = 0.84), and the 3 raters had good agreement between their measurements of sagittal tilt on lateral radiographs (interclass correlation coefficient 0.79, 95% confidence interval [0.65, 0.88], <i>P</i> < 0.01). However, for high-risk fractures, radiographic measurements from lateral radiographs alone resulted in greater variability and underestimation of tilt by 5.2 degrees (95% confidence interval [-18.68, 8.28]) when compared with computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. Owing to this underestimation of sagittal tilt, the raters misclassified high-risk fractures as \\\"low-risk\\\" in most cases (averaging 6.3 of 10, 63%, range 6 - 7) when using lateral radiographs while low-risk fractures were rarely misclassified as high-risk (averaging 1.7 of 21, 7.9%, range 1 - 3, <i>P</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lateral radiographs frequently lead surgeons to misclassify high-risk sagittal tilt of low-energy femoral neck fractures as low-risk. Further research is necessary to improve the assessment of sagittal plane deformity for these injuries.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV diagnostic study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"e273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f6/e7/oi9-6-e273.PMC10113109.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OI9.0000000000000273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是确定股骨颈骨折矢状面畸形的x线评估的有效性和可靠性。设计:这是一项回顾性队列研究。地点:一级创伤中心。患者/参与者:包括31例65岁及以上的低能量Garden型I/II型股骨颈骨折患者,均采用双平面x线片和计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像。主要结果测量:术前矢状面倾斜在侧位x线片上测量,并与在高级影像学上确定的倾斜进行比较。如果后倾角≥20度或前倾角>10度,骨折被定义为“高风险”。结果:31例Garden型I/II型股骨颈骨折中,先进影像学发现10例高危骨折,其中8例(25.8%)后倾角≥20度,2例(6.5%)前倾角>10度。总体而言,侧位x线片测量的矢状位倾斜与高级影像学测量的矢状位倾斜无显著差异(P = 0.84), 3位评分者在侧位x线片测量的矢状位倾斜之间具有良好的一致性(类间相关系数0.79,95%可信区间[0.65,0.88],P < 0.01)。然而,对于高风险骨折,与计算机断层扫描/磁共振成像相比,仅侧位x线片测量结果的倾斜度变异性更大,低估了5.2度(95%可信区间[-18.68,8.28])。由于对矢状面倾斜的低估,在使用侧位片时,评分者在大多数情况下将高风险骨折错误地划分为“低风险”(平均6.3 / 10,63%,范围6 - 7),而低风险骨折很少被错误地划分为高风险(平均1.7 / 21,7.9%,范围1 - 3,P = 0.01)。结论:侧位x线片经常导致外科医生将低能量股骨颈骨折的高危矢状倾斜误诊为低危。需要进一步的研究来改进矢状面畸形对这些损伤的评估。证据等级:四级诊断性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sagittal deformity of Garden type I and II geriatric femoral neck fractures is frequently misclassified by lateral radiographs.

The objective of this study was to determine the validity and inter-rater reliability of radiographic assessment of sagittal deformity of femoral neck fractures.

Design: This is a retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Level 1 trauma center.

Patients/participants: Thirty-one patients 65 years or older who sustained low-energy, Garden type I/II femoral neck fractures imaged with biplanar radiographs and either computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging were included.

Main outcome measurements: Preoperative sagittal tilt was measured on lateral radiographs and compared with the tilt identified on advanced imaging. Fractures were defined as "high-risk" if posterior tilt was ≥20 degrees or anterior tilt was >10 degrees.

Results: Of 31 Garden type I/II femoral neck fractures, advanced imaging identified 10 high-risk fractures including 8 (25.8%) with posterior tilt ≥20 degrees and 2 (6.5%) with anterior tilt >10 degrees. Overall, there was no significant difference between sagittal tilt measured using lateral radiographs and advanced imaging (P = 0.84), and the 3 raters had good agreement between their measurements of sagittal tilt on lateral radiographs (interclass correlation coefficient 0.79, 95% confidence interval [0.65, 0.88], P < 0.01). However, for high-risk fractures, radiographic measurements from lateral radiographs alone resulted in greater variability and underestimation of tilt by 5.2 degrees (95% confidence interval [-18.68, 8.28]) when compared with computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging. Owing to this underestimation of sagittal tilt, the raters misclassified high-risk fractures as "low-risk" in most cases (averaging 6.3 of 10, 63%, range 6 - 7) when using lateral radiographs while low-risk fractures were rarely misclassified as high-risk (averaging 1.7 of 21, 7.9%, range 1 - 3, P = 0.01).

Conclusions: Lateral radiographs frequently lead surgeons to misclassify high-risk sagittal tilt of low-energy femoral neck fractures as low-risk. Further research is necessary to improve the assessment of sagittal plane deformity for these injuries.

Level of evidence: Level IV diagnostic study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Linking a nail and a plate for distal femur fractures: a technical trick. Clinical relevance of current patient-reported outcome measures for ankle fracture: surgeons' perspective. Deep infections after low-velocity ballistic tibia fractures are frequently polymicrobial and recalcitrant. Hypertrophic nonunion management with distraction osteogenesis: a scoping review of the literature. Outcomes of internal fixation with Femoral Neck System (FNS) for intracapsular femoral neck fractures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1