Xiao-Lu Hu, Pei-Kai Huang, Meng Zhang, Jun Chen, Meng-Qiang Xiao
{"title":"多重减剂量技术对冠状动脉计算机断层造影的影响。","authors":"Xiao-Lu Hu, Pei-Kai Huang, Meng Zhang, Jun Chen, Meng-Qiang Xiao","doi":"10.4329/wjr.v15.i2.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is the preferred non-invasive examination method for coronary heart disease. However, the radiation from computed tomography has become a concern since public awareness of radiation hazards continue to increase.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the value of multiple dose reduction techniques for CCTA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive normal and overweight patients were prospectively divided into two groups: Group A<sub>1</sub>, patients who received multiple dose reduction scans (<i>n</i> = 82); and group A<sub>2</sub>, patients who received conventional scans (<i>n</i> = 39). The scan parameters for group A<sub>1</sub> were as follows: Isocentric scan, tube voltage = 80 kV, and tube current control using 80% smart milliampere. The scan parameters for group A<sub>2</sub> were as follows: Normal position, tube voltage = 100 kV, and smart milliampere.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average effective doses (EDs) for groups A<sub>1</sub> and A<sub>2</sub> were 1.13 ± 0.35 and 3.36 ± 1.30 mSv, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in ED between the two groups (<i>P</i> < 0.01). Furthermore, noise was significantly lower, and both signal-to-noise ratio and contrast signal-to-noise ratio were higher in group A<sub>2</sub> when compared to group A<sub>1</sub> (<i>P</i> < 0.01). Moreover, the subjective image quality (IQ) scores were excellent in both groups, in which there was no significant difference in subjective IQ score between the two groups (<i>P</i> = 0.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multiple dose reduction scan techniques can significantly decrease the ED of patients receiving CCTA examinations for clinical diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23819,"journal":{"name":"World journal of radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6b/2a/WJR-15-32.PMC9979190.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of combining multiple dose reduction techniques on coronary computed tomography angiography.\",\"authors\":\"Xiao-Lu Hu, Pei-Kai Huang, Meng Zhang, Jun Chen, Meng-Qiang Xiao\",\"doi\":\"10.4329/wjr.v15.i2.32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is the preferred non-invasive examination method for coronary heart disease. However, the radiation from computed tomography has become a concern since public awareness of radiation hazards continue to increase.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the value of multiple dose reduction techniques for CCTA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive normal and overweight patients were prospectively divided into two groups: Group A<sub>1</sub>, patients who received multiple dose reduction scans (<i>n</i> = 82); and group A<sub>2</sub>, patients who received conventional scans (<i>n</i> = 39). The scan parameters for group A<sub>1</sub> were as follows: Isocentric scan, tube voltage = 80 kV, and tube current control using 80% smart milliampere. The scan parameters for group A<sub>2</sub> were as follows: Normal position, tube voltage = 100 kV, and smart milliampere.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average effective doses (EDs) for groups A<sub>1</sub> and A<sub>2</sub> were 1.13 ± 0.35 and 3.36 ± 1.30 mSv, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in ED between the two groups (<i>P</i> < 0.01). Furthermore, noise was significantly lower, and both signal-to-noise ratio and contrast signal-to-noise ratio were higher in group A<sub>2</sub> when compared to group A<sub>1</sub> (<i>P</i> < 0.01). Moreover, the subjective image quality (IQ) scores were excellent in both groups, in which there was no significant difference in subjective IQ score between the two groups (<i>P</i> = 0.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multiple dose reduction scan techniques can significantly decrease the ED of patients receiving CCTA examinations for clinical diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World journal of radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6b/2a/WJR-15-32.PMC9979190.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World journal of radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v15.i2.32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v15.i2.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of combining multiple dose reduction techniques on coronary computed tomography angiography.
Background: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is the preferred non-invasive examination method for coronary heart disease. However, the radiation from computed tomography has become a concern since public awareness of radiation hazards continue to increase.
Aim: To explore the value of multiple dose reduction techniques for CCTA.
Methods: Consecutive normal and overweight patients were prospectively divided into two groups: Group A1, patients who received multiple dose reduction scans (n = 82); and group A2, patients who received conventional scans (n = 39). The scan parameters for group A1 were as follows: Isocentric scan, tube voltage = 80 kV, and tube current control using 80% smart milliampere. The scan parameters for group A2 were as follows: Normal position, tube voltage = 100 kV, and smart milliampere.
Results: The average effective doses (EDs) for groups A1 and A2 were 1.13 ± 0.35 and 3.36 ± 1.30 mSv, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in ED between the two groups (P < 0.01). Furthermore, noise was significantly lower, and both signal-to-noise ratio and contrast signal-to-noise ratio were higher in group A2 when compared to group A1 (P < 0.01). Moreover, the subjective image quality (IQ) scores were excellent in both groups, in which there was no significant difference in subjective IQ score between the two groups (P = 0.12).
Conclusion: Multiple dose reduction scan techniques can significantly decrease the ED of patients receiving CCTA examinations for clinical diagnosis.