目的非对比ct评价外周动脉病变钙化斑块的坚固性。

IF 1.7 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Endovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-02 DOI:10.1177/15266028231170119
Dai Ozaki, Ken Yokoyama, Tetsuro Miyazaki, Koji Hirabayashi, Hiroshi Abe, Kosuke Yabe, Midori Kakihara, Masaaki Maki, Ryosuke Shimai, Hiroyuki Isogai, Shohei Ouchi, Yuki Yasuda, Fuminori Odagiri, Kazuhisa Takamura, Kenji Yaginuma, Takashi Tokano, Takashi Iwasaki, Satoru Kawai, Toru Minamino
{"title":"目的非对比ct评价外周动脉病变钙化斑块的坚固性。","authors":"Dai Ozaki, Ken Yokoyama, Tetsuro Miyazaki, Koji Hirabayashi, Hiroshi Abe, Kosuke Yabe, Midori Kakihara, Masaaki Maki, Ryosuke Shimai, Hiroyuki Isogai, Shohei Ouchi, Yuki Yasuda, Fuminori Odagiri, Kazuhisa Takamura, Kenji Yaginuma, Takashi Tokano, Takashi Iwasaki, Satoru Kawai, Toru Minamino","doi":"10.1177/15266028231170119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The presence of severely calcified plaque remains problematic in endovascular therapy, and no specific endovascular treatment strategy has been established. Estimating plaque solidity before the procedure may help operators penetrate calcified plaque with a guide wire. The aim of this study was to establish a method of measuring plaque solidity with noncontrast computed tomography (CT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center study included consecutive patients who, between October 2020 and July 2022, underwent noncontrast 5 mm and 1 mm CTs before endovascular therapy to penetrate calcified plaque with a wire in the common femoral, superficial femoral, and popliteal arteries. Three cross-sectional CT slices were selected. To target a calcified plaque lesion, the operator identified a region of interest, which corresponded to 24×24 pixels, and Hounsfield unit (HU) values of each pixel were displayed on the CT image. The average HU values and the ratio of number of pixels of lower values (130-599 HU) represented plaque solidity. We used the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon rank-sum test and the chi-square test to compare the solidity of plaques penetrated and not penetrated by the wire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We evaluated 108 images of 36 calcified plaque lesions (in 19 patients). The wire penetrated 28 lesions (77.8%) successfully. The average HU value was significantly lower in the lesions that the wire penetrated than in the others, in both the 5 mm CT slices (434.7±86.8 HU vs 554.3±112.7 HU, p=0.0174) and 1 mm slices (497.8±103.1 HU vs 593.5±114.5 HU, p=0.0381). The receiver operating curve revealed that 529.9 and 533.9 HU in the 5 and 1 mm slices, respectively, were the highest values at which wires could penetrate. Moreover, at the lesions that were penetrates successfully, the ratio of number of lower HU value pixels was significantly higher both in 5 mm slice CTs (74.7±13.4 vs 61.7±13.1%, p=0.0347) and 1 mm (68.7±11.8 vs 57.1±11.4%, p=0.0174).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of noncontrast CT to evaluate plaque solidity was associated with successful wire penetration of calcified lesions in peripheral arteries.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>This study revealed an association between the wire penetration inside calcified plaque and plaque solidity estimated using non-contrasted computed tomography. The mean Hounsfield unit values of three cross-sections in calcified plaques were associated with the successful wire penetration. This wire penetration difficulty is associated with extended procedure time, excessive radiation exposure, usage of extra contrast agents, and increased medical costs. Therefore, estimating calcified plaque solidity before procedure enables us to choose effective and lean procedures. In addition, to predict the success of dilating calcified plaque from the inside is also beneficial when the operator wants to avoid extra scaffold implantation for target lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"139-147"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Objective Evaluation With Noncontrast Computed Tomography Can Reveal Calcified Plaque Solidity in Peripheral Artery Diseases.\",\"authors\":\"Dai Ozaki, Ken Yokoyama, Tetsuro Miyazaki, Koji Hirabayashi, Hiroshi Abe, Kosuke Yabe, Midori Kakihara, Masaaki Maki, Ryosuke Shimai, Hiroyuki Isogai, Shohei Ouchi, Yuki Yasuda, Fuminori Odagiri, Kazuhisa Takamura, Kenji Yaginuma, Takashi Tokano, Takashi Iwasaki, Satoru Kawai, Toru Minamino\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15266028231170119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The presence of severely calcified plaque remains problematic in endovascular therapy, and no specific endovascular treatment strategy has been established. Estimating plaque solidity before the procedure may help operators penetrate calcified plaque with a guide wire. The aim of this study was to establish a method of measuring plaque solidity with noncontrast computed tomography (CT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center study included consecutive patients who, between October 2020 and July 2022, underwent noncontrast 5 mm and 1 mm CTs before endovascular therapy to penetrate calcified plaque with a wire in the common femoral, superficial femoral, and popliteal arteries. Three cross-sectional CT slices were selected. To target a calcified plaque lesion, the operator identified a region of interest, which corresponded to 24×24 pixels, and Hounsfield unit (HU) values of each pixel were displayed on the CT image. The average HU values and the ratio of number of pixels of lower values (130-599 HU) represented plaque solidity. We used the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon rank-sum test and the chi-square test to compare the solidity of plaques penetrated and not penetrated by the wire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We evaluated 108 images of 36 calcified plaque lesions (in 19 patients). The wire penetrated 28 lesions (77.8%) successfully. The average HU value was significantly lower in the lesions that the wire penetrated than in the others, in both the 5 mm CT slices (434.7±86.8 HU vs 554.3±112.7 HU, p=0.0174) and 1 mm slices (497.8±103.1 HU vs 593.5±114.5 HU, p=0.0381). The receiver operating curve revealed that 529.9 and 533.9 HU in the 5 and 1 mm slices, respectively, were the highest values at which wires could penetrate. Moreover, at the lesions that were penetrates successfully, the ratio of number of lower HU value pixels was significantly higher both in 5 mm slice CTs (74.7±13.4 vs 61.7±13.1%, p=0.0347) and 1 mm (68.7±11.8 vs 57.1±11.4%, p=0.0174).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of noncontrast CT to evaluate plaque solidity was associated with successful wire penetration of calcified lesions in peripheral arteries.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>This study revealed an association between the wire penetration inside calcified plaque and plaque solidity estimated using non-contrasted computed tomography. The mean Hounsfield unit values of three cross-sections in calcified plaques were associated with the successful wire penetration. This wire penetration difficulty is associated with extended procedure time, excessive radiation exposure, usage of extra contrast agents, and increased medical costs. Therefore, estimating calcified plaque solidity before procedure enables us to choose effective and lean procedures. In addition, to predict the success of dilating calcified plaque from the inside is also beneficial when the operator wants to avoid extra scaffold implantation for target lesions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Endovascular Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"139-147\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Endovascular Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028231170119\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028231170119","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:严重钙化斑块的存在在血管内治疗中仍是一个问题,目前尚未建立特异性的血管内治疗策略。在手术前估计斑块的硬度可以帮助操作人员用导丝穿透钙化斑块。本研究的目的是建立一种用非对比计算机断层扫描(CT)测量斑块固体度的方法。方法:这项回顾性的单中心研究纳入了连续的患者,这些患者在2020年10月至2022年7月期间接受了5毫米和1毫米的非对比ct,然后在股总动脉、股浅动脉和腘动脉进行血管内治疗,以穿透钙化斑块。选择3张横切面CT切片。为了定位钙化斑块病变,操作员确定了一个感兴趣的区域,该区域对应于24×24像素,并在CT图像上显示每个像素的Hounsfield单位(HU)值。平均HU值和较低值像素数之比(130-599 HU)代表斑块的坚固性。我们使用Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon秩和检验和卡方检验来比较金属丝穿透和未穿透的斑块的坚固性。结果:我们评估了108张36个钙化斑块病变的图像(19例患者)。导线成功穿透病灶28处(77.8%)。在5 mm CT片上(434.7±86.8 HU vs 554.3±112.7 HU, p=0.0174)和1 mm CT片上(497.8±103.1 HU vs 593.5±114.5 HU, p=0.0381),导线穿透病变的平均HU值明显低于其他病变。接收器工作曲线显示,529.9和533.9 HU分别是5和1 mm切片中线能穿透的最高值。此外,在成功穿透的病变中,5 mm ct(74.7±13.4 vs 61.7±13.1%,p=0.0347)和1 mm ct(68.7±11.8 vs 57.1±11.4%,p=0.0174)的低HU值像素数比例均显著高于5 mm ct(74.7±13.4 vs 61.7±13.1%,p=0.0347)。结论:使用非对比CT评估斑块的坚固性与外周动脉钙化病变的钢丝穿透成功相关。临床影响:本研究揭示了金属丝在钙化斑块内的穿透力与使用非对比计算机断层扫描估计的斑块坚固度之间的关系。钙化斑块的三个横截面的平均Hounsfield单位值与导线成功穿透有关。这种导线穿透困难与手术时间延长、过度辐射暴露、使用额外的造影剂和增加的医疗费用有关。因此,在手术前评估钙化斑块的坚固性使我们能够选择有效和精简的手术。此外,从内部预测钙化斑块扩张的成功也是有益的,当操作者希望避免额外的支架植入目标病变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Objective Evaluation With Noncontrast Computed Tomography Can Reveal Calcified Plaque Solidity in Peripheral Artery Diseases.

Purpose: The presence of severely calcified plaque remains problematic in endovascular therapy, and no specific endovascular treatment strategy has been established. Estimating plaque solidity before the procedure may help operators penetrate calcified plaque with a guide wire. The aim of this study was to establish a method of measuring plaque solidity with noncontrast computed tomography (CT).

Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included consecutive patients who, between October 2020 and July 2022, underwent noncontrast 5 mm and 1 mm CTs before endovascular therapy to penetrate calcified plaque with a wire in the common femoral, superficial femoral, and popliteal arteries. Three cross-sectional CT slices were selected. To target a calcified plaque lesion, the operator identified a region of interest, which corresponded to 24×24 pixels, and Hounsfield unit (HU) values of each pixel were displayed on the CT image. The average HU values and the ratio of number of pixels of lower values (130-599 HU) represented plaque solidity. We used the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon rank-sum test and the chi-square test to compare the solidity of plaques penetrated and not penetrated by the wire.

Results: We evaluated 108 images of 36 calcified plaque lesions (in 19 patients). The wire penetrated 28 lesions (77.8%) successfully. The average HU value was significantly lower in the lesions that the wire penetrated than in the others, in both the 5 mm CT slices (434.7±86.8 HU vs 554.3±112.7 HU, p=0.0174) and 1 mm slices (497.8±103.1 HU vs 593.5±114.5 HU, p=0.0381). The receiver operating curve revealed that 529.9 and 533.9 HU in the 5 and 1 mm slices, respectively, were the highest values at which wires could penetrate. Moreover, at the lesions that were penetrates successfully, the ratio of number of lower HU value pixels was significantly higher both in 5 mm slice CTs (74.7±13.4 vs 61.7±13.1%, p=0.0347) and 1 mm (68.7±11.8 vs 57.1±11.4%, p=0.0174).

Conclusion: The use of noncontrast CT to evaluate plaque solidity was associated with successful wire penetration of calcified lesions in peripheral arteries.

Clinical impact: This study revealed an association between the wire penetration inside calcified plaque and plaque solidity estimated using non-contrasted computed tomography. The mean Hounsfield unit values of three cross-sections in calcified plaques were associated with the successful wire penetration. This wire penetration difficulty is associated with extended procedure time, excessive radiation exposure, usage of extra contrast agents, and increased medical costs. Therefore, estimating calcified plaque solidity before procedure enables us to choose effective and lean procedures. In addition, to predict the success of dilating calcified plaque from the inside is also beneficial when the operator wants to avoid extra scaffold implantation for target lesions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
期刊最新文献
Transapical to Femoral Through-and-Through Wire Technique for Ruptured Aortic Arch Aneurysm Management: Case Report and Review of Literature. Percutaneous Superficial Temporal Artery Access Facilitating Carotid Artery Stenting Performed From Distal Radial Artery. Stent Implantation and Thromboendarterectomy for the Common Femoral Artery in Real-World Practice. Endovascular Treatment for Isolated Infected Iliac Artery Aneurysms. Initial Clinical Experience With AneuFix Injectable Biocompatible Elastomer for Translumbar Embolization of Type 2 Endoleaks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1