猪小肠黏膜下膜成形术疗效的回顾性比较研究。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Acta Oto-Laryngologica Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1080/00016489.2023.2182451
Li Jin, Xueying Pan, Tuanfang Yin, Jihao Ren, Wei Liu
{"title":"猪小肠黏膜下膜成形术疗效的回顾性比较研究。","authors":"Li Jin,&nbsp;Xueying Pan,&nbsp;Tuanfang Yin,&nbsp;Jihao Ren,&nbsp;Wei Liu","doi":"10.1080/00016489.2023.2182451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The surgical outcomes following tympanic membrane (TM) repair are affected by many factors.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic porcine small intestine submucosa graft (PSISG) myringoplasty by comparing with endoscopic myringoplasty with temporal fascia (TF) and perichondrium (PC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective comparative study that a total of 98 patients with TM perforations were included. The patients underwent endoscopic myringoplasty using PSISG, TF or PC as the graft. The closure rate, hearing outcomes, operative time and complications in three groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 3 months postoperatively, the closure rate were 85.2% (23/27), 92.1% (35/38) and 87.9% (29/33) in the PSISG, TF and PC groups respectively (<i>p</i> = .667); Hearing improved after surgery in three groups (<i>p</i> < .001), and showed no significant difference among the three groups. The mean operative time of the PSISG group was shorter than autologous TF (<i>p</i> < .001) and PC groups (<i>p</i> < .001) in this study; No operative or postoperative complications were found among the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compare to autologous temporal fascia or perichondrium, the PSISG appears to be an effective and safe material for TM perforations closure. Endoscopic PSISG myringoplasty may be an alternative technique for repairing TM perforations, especially for revision cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":6880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","volume":"143 4","pages":"274-279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of endoscopic porcine small intestinal submucosa graft myringoplasty: a retrospective comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Li Jin,&nbsp;Xueying Pan,&nbsp;Tuanfang Yin,&nbsp;Jihao Ren,&nbsp;Wei Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00016489.2023.2182451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The surgical outcomes following tympanic membrane (TM) repair are affected by many factors.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic porcine small intestine submucosa graft (PSISG) myringoplasty by comparing with endoscopic myringoplasty with temporal fascia (TF) and perichondrium (PC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective comparative study that a total of 98 patients with TM perforations were included. The patients underwent endoscopic myringoplasty using PSISG, TF or PC as the graft. The closure rate, hearing outcomes, operative time and complications in three groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 3 months postoperatively, the closure rate were 85.2% (23/27), 92.1% (35/38) and 87.9% (29/33) in the PSISG, TF and PC groups respectively (<i>p</i> = .667); Hearing improved after surgery in three groups (<i>p</i> < .001), and showed no significant difference among the three groups. The mean operative time of the PSISG group was shorter than autologous TF (<i>p</i> < .001) and PC groups (<i>p</i> < .001) in this study; No operative or postoperative complications were found among the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compare to autologous temporal fascia or perichondrium, the PSISG appears to be an effective and safe material for TM perforations closure. Endoscopic PSISG myringoplasty may be an alternative technique for repairing TM perforations, especially for revision cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"volume\":\"143 4\",\"pages\":\"274-279\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oto-Laryngologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2023.2182451\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oto-Laryngologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2023.2182451","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:鼓膜修复术后的手术效果受多种因素的影响。目的:通过比较内镜下猪小肠粘膜下膜成形术(PSISG)与颞筋膜成形术(TF)和软骨膜成形术(PC)的疗效,评价内镜下猪小肠粘膜下膜成形术(PSISG)的疗效。方法:对98例TM穿孔患者进行回顾性比较研究。患者采用pssg、TF或PC作为移植物行内镜下鼻膜成形术。比较三组患者的闭合率、听力、手术时间及并发症。结果:术后3个月,PSISG组、TF组和PC组的闭合率分别为85.2%(23/27)、92.1%(35/38)和87.9% (29/33)(p = .667);结论:与自体颞筋膜或硬骨膜相比,pssg是一种有效、安全的TM穿孔闭合材料。内镜下pssg鼓膜成形术可能是修复TM穿孔的替代技术,特别是对于翻修病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of endoscopic porcine small intestinal submucosa graft myringoplasty: a retrospective comparative study.

Background: The surgical outcomes following tympanic membrane (TM) repair are affected by many factors.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic porcine small intestine submucosa graft (PSISG) myringoplasty by comparing with endoscopic myringoplasty with temporal fascia (TF) and perichondrium (PC).

Methods: We conducted a retrospective comparative study that a total of 98 patients with TM perforations were included. The patients underwent endoscopic myringoplasty using PSISG, TF or PC as the graft. The closure rate, hearing outcomes, operative time and complications in three groups were compared.

Results: At 3 months postoperatively, the closure rate were 85.2% (23/27), 92.1% (35/38) and 87.9% (29/33) in the PSISG, TF and PC groups respectively (p = .667); Hearing improved after surgery in three groups (p < .001), and showed no significant difference among the three groups. The mean operative time of the PSISG group was shorter than autologous TF (p < .001) and PC groups (p < .001) in this study; No operative or postoperative complications were found among the three groups.

Conclusion: Compare to autologous temporal fascia or perichondrium, the PSISG appears to be an effective and safe material for TM perforations closure. Endoscopic PSISG myringoplasty may be an alternative technique for repairing TM perforations, especially for revision cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Acta Oto-Laryngologica 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Oto-Laryngologica is a truly international journal for translational otolaryngology and head- and neck surgery. The journal presents cutting-edge papers on clinical practice, clinical research and basic sciences. Acta also bridges the gap between clinical and basic research.
期刊最新文献
Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: predictors of recurrence 5 years after surgery. Extent of abscess development in cervical abscesses and pathogenic bacteria related to swallowing function. Narrow band imaging in oral cancer did not improve visualisation of the tumour borders: a prospective cohort study. Improved intracochlear biopolymeric drug delivery system: an in vivo study. Case-control study of otoconia proteins otolin-1 and otoconin-90 in patients with Meniere's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1