胚胎植入前基因检测活检后的产科、新生儿和儿童健康结果。

IF 14.8 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Human Reproduction Update Pub Date : 2023-05-02 DOI:10.1093/humupd/dmad001
Alessandra Alteri, Greta Chiara Cermisoni, Mirko Pozzoni, Gerarda Gaeta, Paolo Ivo Cavoretto, Paola Viganò
{"title":"胚胎植入前基因检测活检后的产科、新生儿和儿童健康结果。","authors":"Alessandra Alteri,&nbsp;Greta Chiara Cermisoni,&nbsp;Mirko Pozzoni,&nbsp;Gerarda Gaeta,&nbsp;Paolo Ivo Cavoretto,&nbsp;Paola Viganò","doi":"10.1093/humupd/dmad001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) of embryos developed in vitro requires a biopsy for obtaining cellular samples for the analysis. Signs of cell injury have been described in association with this procedure. Thus, the consequences of the biopsy on obstetric and neonatal outcomes have been the subject of some quantitative analyses, although the reliability of data pooling may be limited by important issues in the various reports.</p><p><strong>Objective and rationale: </strong>The present review identifies evidence for whether pregnancies conceived after embryo biopsy are associated with a higher risk of adverse obstetric, neonatal, and long-term outcomes. Available evidence has been summarized considering manipulation at various stages of embryo development.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We used the scoping review methodology. Searches of article databases were performed with keywords pertaining to the embryo biopsy technique and obstetric, neonatal, and postnatal outcomes. Studies in which embryos were biopsied at different stages (i.e. both at the cleavage and blastocyst stages) were excluded. We included data on fresh and frozen embryo transfers. The final sample of 31 documents was subjected to qualitative thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Sound evidence is lacking to fully address the issues on the potential obstetric, neonatal or long-term consequences of embryo biopsy. For polar body biopsy, the literature is too scant to draw any conclusion. Some data, although limited and controversial, suggest a possible association of embryo biopsy at the cleavage stage with an increased risk of low birthweight and small for gestational age neonates compared to babies derived from non-biopsied embryos. An increase in preterm deliveries and birth defects in cases of trophectoderm biopsy was suggested. For both biopsy methods (at the cleavage and blastocyst stages), an increased risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy was found. However, these findings may be explained by confounders such as other embryo manipulation procedures or by intrinsic patient or population characteristics.</p><p><strong>Wider implications: </strong>Since there is inadequate evidence to assess obstetric, neonatal, and long-term health outcomes following embryo biopsy, an invasive PGT strategy should be developed with a cautious approach. A non-invasive approach, based on the analysis of embryo cell-free DNA, needs to be pursued to overcome the potential limitations of embryo biopsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":55045,"journal":{"name":"Human Reproduction Update","volume":"29 3","pages":"291-306"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d1/10/dmad001.PMC10152168.pdf","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obstetric, neonatal, and child health outcomes following embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandra Alteri,&nbsp;Greta Chiara Cermisoni,&nbsp;Mirko Pozzoni,&nbsp;Gerarda Gaeta,&nbsp;Paolo Ivo Cavoretto,&nbsp;Paola Viganò\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/humupd/dmad001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) of embryos developed in vitro requires a biopsy for obtaining cellular samples for the analysis. Signs of cell injury have been described in association with this procedure. Thus, the consequences of the biopsy on obstetric and neonatal outcomes have been the subject of some quantitative analyses, although the reliability of data pooling may be limited by important issues in the various reports.</p><p><strong>Objective and rationale: </strong>The present review identifies evidence for whether pregnancies conceived after embryo biopsy are associated with a higher risk of adverse obstetric, neonatal, and long-term outcomes. Available evidence has been summarized considering manipulation at various stages of embryo development.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We used the scoping review methodology. Searches of article databases were performed with keywords pertaining to the embryo biopsy technique and obstetric, neonatal, and postnatal outcomes. Studies in which embryos were biopsied at different stages (i.e. both at the cleavage and blastocyst stages) were excluded. We included data on fresh and frozen embryo transfers. The final sample of 31 documents was subjected to qualitative thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Sound evidence is lacking to fully address the issues on the potential obstetric, neonatal or long-term consequences of embryo biopsy. For polar body biopsy, the literature is too scant to draw any conclusion. Some data, although limited and controversial, suggest a possible association of embryo biopsy at the cleavage stage with an increased risk of low birthweight and small for gestational age neonates compared to babies derived from non-biopsied embryos. An increase in preterm deliveries and birth defects in cases of trophectoderm biopsy was suggested. For both biopsy methods (at the cleavage and blastocyst stages), an increased risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy was found. However, these findings may be explained by confounders such as other embryo manipulation procedures or by intrinsic patient or population characteristics.</p><p><strong>Wider implications: </strong>Since there is inadequate evidence to assess obstetric, neonatal, and long-term health outcomes following embryo biopsy, an invasive PGT strategy should be developed with a cautious approach. A non-invasive approach, based on the analysis of embryo cell-free DNA, needs to be pursued to overcome the potential limitations of embryo biopsy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Reproduction Update\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"291-306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d1/10/dmad001.PMC10152168.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Reproduction Update\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmad001\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Reproduction Update","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmad001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

背景:体外胚胎的植入前遗传学检测(PGT)需要进行活组织检查以获得细胞样本进行分析。细胞损伤的迹象已被描述与此过程有关。因此,活检对产科和新生儿结局的影响一直是一些定量分析的主题,尽管数据汇集的可靠性可能受到各种报告中重要问题的限制。目的和理由:本综述确定了胚胎活检后妊娠是否与较高的不良产科、新生儿和长期预后风险相关的证据。现有的证据已经总结考虑操作在胚胎发育的各个阶段。检索方法:我们使用范围审查方法。在文章数据库中搜索与胚胎活检技术和产科、新生儿和产后结局相关的关键词。在不同阶段(即在卵裂期和囊胚期)对胚胎进行活检的研究被排除在外。我们纳入了新鲜和冷冻胚胎移植的数据。最后的31份文件样本进行了定性专题分析。结果:缺乏可靠的证据来充分解决胚胎活检对产科、新生儿或长期后果的潜在问题。对于极体活检,文献太少,无法得出任何结论。一些数据,尽管有限且有争议,表明在卵裂期进行胚胎活检可能与低出生体重和小胎龄新生儿的风险增加有关。在营养外胚层活检的情况下,早产和出生缺陷的增加被认为。对于两种活检方法(在卵裂期和囊胚期),发现妊娠高血压疾病的风险增加。然而,这些发现可能是由其他胚胎操作程序或患者或群体固有特征等混杂因素解释的。更广泛的影响:由于没有足够的证据来评估胚胎活检后的产科、新生儿和长期健康结果,因此侵入性PGT策略应该以谨慎的方式发展。需要寻求一种基于胚胎无细胞DNA分析的非侵入性方法,以克服胚胎活检的潜在局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Obstetric, neonatal, and child health outcomes following embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing.

Background: Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) of embryos developed in vitro requires a biopsy for obtaining cellular samples for the analysis. Signs of cell injury have been described in association with this procedure. Thus, the consequences of the biopsy on obstetric and neonatal outcomes have been the subject of some quantitative analyses, although the reliability of data pooling may be limited by important issues in the various reports.

Objective and rationale: The present review identifies evidence for whether pregnancies conceived after embryo biopsy are associated with a higher risk of adverse obstetric, neonatal, and long-term outcomes. Available evidence has been summarized considering manipulation at various stages of embryo development.

Search methods: We used the scoping review methodology. Searches of article databases were performed with keywords pertaining to the embryo biopsy technique and obstetric, neonatal, and postnatal outcomes. Studies in which embryos were biopsied at different stages (i.e. both at the cleavage and blastocyst stages) were excluded. We included data on fresh and frozen embryo transfers. The final sample of 31 documents was subjected to qualitative thematic analysis.

Outcomes: Sound evidence is lacking to fully address the issues on the potential obstetric, neonatal or long-term consequences of embryo biopsy. For polar body biopsy, the literature is too scant to draw any conclusion. Some data, although limited and controversial, suggest a possible association of embryo biopsy at the cleavage stage with an increased risk of low birthweight and small for gestational age neonates compared to babies derived from non-biopsied embryos. An increase in preterm deliveries and birth defects in cases of trophectoderm biopsy was suggested. For both biopsy methods (at the cleavage and blastocyst stages), an increased risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy was found. However, these findings may be explained by confounders such as other embryo manipulation procedures or by intrinsic patient or population characteristics.

Wider implications: Since there is inadequate evidence to assess obstetric, neonatal, and long-term health outcomes following embryo biopsy, an invasive PGT strategy should be developed with a cautious approach. A non-invasive approach, based on the analysis of embryo cell-free DNA, needs to be pursued to overcome the potential limitations of embryo biopsy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Reproduction Update
Human Reproduction Update 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
28.80
自引率
1.50%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Human Reproduction Update is the leading journal in its field, boasting a Journal Impact FactorTM of 13.3 and ranked first in Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (Source: Journal Citation ReportsTM from Clarivate, 2023). It specializes in publishing comprehensive and systematic review articles covering various aspects of human reproductive physiology and medicine. The journal prioritizes basic, transitional, and clinical topics related to reproduction, encompassing areas such as andrology, embryology, infertility, gynaecology, pregnancy, reproductive endocrinology, reproductive epidemiology, reproductive genetics, reproductive immunology, and reproductive oncology. Human Reproduction Update is published on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), maintaining the highest scientific and editorial standards.
期刊最新文献
Defects in mRNA splicing and implications for infertility: a comprehensive review and in silico analysis. Parental conditions, modifiable lifestyle factors, and first trimester growth and development: a systematic review. Fertility in transgender and gender diverse people: systematic review of the effects of gender-affirming hormones on reproductive organs and fertility Functional hypothalamic amenorrhoea and polycystic ovarian morphology: a narrative review about an intriguing association. Celebrating 30 years at Human Reproduction Update.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1