Maciej Dudek, Lukasz Szarpak, Frank W Peacock, Aleksandra Gasecka, Tomasz Michalski, Pawel Wroblewski, Halla Kaminska, Gabriela Borkowska, Ewa Skrzypek, Adam Smereka, Jaroslaw Meyer-Szary, Sylwia Marciniak, Mariola Malecka
{"title":"使用点超声对复苏结果的诊断性能:3265例患者的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Maciej Dudek, Lukasz Szarpak, Frank W Peacock, Aleksandra Gasecka, Tomasz Michalski, Pawel Wroblewski, Halla Kaminska, Gabriela Borkowska, Ewa Skrzypek, Adam Smereka, Jaroslaw Meyer-Szary, Sylwia Marciniak, Mariola Malecka","doi":"10.5603/CJ.a2021.0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Echocardiography in the setting of resuscitation can provide information as to the cause of the cardiac arrest, as well as indicators of futility. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine the value of point-of-care ultrasonography (PoCUS) in the assessment of survival for adult patients with cardiac arrest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This meta-analysis was performed in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane have been searched from databases inception until March 2nd 2021. The search was limited to adult patients with cardiac arrest and without publication dates or country restrictions. Papers were chosen if they met the required criteria relating to the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of this diagnostic technique concerning resuscitation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This systematic review identified 20 studies. Overall, for survival to hospital discharge, PoCUS was 6.2% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.7-8.0%) and 2.1% specific (95% CI 0.8-4.2%). PoCUS sensitivity and specificity for return of spontaneous circulation were 23.8% (95% CI 21.4-26.4%) and 50.7% (95% CI 45.8-55.7%) respectively, and for survival to admission 13.8% (95% CI 12.2-15.5%) and 20.1% (95% CI 16.2-24.3%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results do not allow unambiguous recommendation of PoCUS as a predictor of resuscitation outcomes and further studies based on a large number of patients with full standardization of operators, their training and procedures performed were necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":9492,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":"30 2","pages":"237-246"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5c/20/cardj-30-2-237.PMC10129265.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic performance of point-of-use ultrasound of resuscitation outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 3265 patients.\",\"authors\":\"Maciej Dudek, Lukasz Szarpak, Frank W Peacock, Aleksandra Gasecka, Tomasz Michalski, Pawel Wroblewski, Halla Kaminska, Gabriela Borkowska, Ewa Skrzypek, Adam Smereka, Jaroslaw Meyer-Szary, Sylwia Marciniak, Mariola Malecka\",\"doi\":\"10.5603/CJ.a2021.0044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Echocardiography in the setting of resuscitation can provide information as to the cause of the cardiac arrest, as well as indicators of futility. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine the value of point-of-care ultrasonography (PoCUS) in the assessment of survival for adult patients with cardiac arrest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This meta-analysis was performed in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane have been searched from databases inception until March 2nd 2021. The search was limited to adult patients with cardiac arrest and without publication dates or country restrictions. Papers were chosen if they met the required criteria relating to the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of this diagnostic technique concerning resuscitation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This systematic review identified 20 studies. Overall, for survival to hospital discharge, PoCUS was 6.2% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.7-8.0%) and 2.1% specific (95% CI 0.8-4.2%). PoCUS sensitivity and specificity for return of spontaneous circulation were 23.8% (95% CI 21.4-26.4%) and 50.7% (95% CI 45.8-55.7%) respectively, and for survival to admission 13.8% (95% CI 12.2-15.5%) and 20.1% (95% CI 16.2-24.3%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results do not allow unambiguous recommendation of PoCUS as a predictor of resuscitation outcomes and further studies based on a large number of patients with full standardization of operators, their training and procedures performed were necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology journal\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"237-246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5c/20/cardj-30-2-237.PMC10129265.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2021.0044\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/CJ.a2021.0044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景:超声心动图在复苏的设置可以提供信息的心脏骤停的原因,以及徒劳的指标。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在确定即时超声检查(PoCUS)在评估心脏骤停成年患者生存中的价值。方法:本荟萃分析遵循系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane从数据库建立到2021年3月2日已被检索。该研究仅限于心脏骤停的成年患者,没有发表日期或国家限制。如果论文符合与复苏结果相关的诊断技术的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值相关的要求标准,则选择论文。结果:本系统综述确定了20项研究。总体而言,对于存活至出院,PoCUS敏感性为6.2%(95%可信区间[CI] 4.7-8.0%),特异性为2.1% (95% CI 0.8-4.2%)。PoCUS对自发循环恢复的敏感性和特异性分别为23.8% (95% CI 21.4-26.4%)和50.7% (95% CI 45.8-55.7%),对存活至入院的敏感性和特异性分别为13.8% (95% CI 12.2-15.5%)和20.1% (95% CI 16.2-24.3%)。结论:该结果不允许明确推荐PoCUS作为复苏结果的预测指标,并且基于大量患者的进一步研究,操作员的完全标准化,他们的培训和操作程序是必要的。
Diagnostic performance of point-of-use ultrasound of resuscitation outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 3265 patients.
Background: Echocardiography in the setting of resuscitation can provide information as to the cause of the cardiac arrest, as well as indicators of futility. This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine the value of point-of-care ultrasonography (PoCUS) in the assessment of survival for adult patients with cardiac arrest.
Methods: This meta-analysis was performed in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane have been searched from databases inception until March 2nd 2021. The search was limited to adult patients with cardiac arrest and without publication dates or country restrictions. Papers were chosen if they met the required criteria relating to the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of this diagnostic technique concerning resuscitation outcomes.
Results: This systematic review identified 20 studies. Overall, for survival to hospital discharge, PoCUS was 6.2% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.7-8.0%) and 2.1% specific (95% CI 0.8-4.2%). PoCUS sensitivity and specificity for return of spontaneous circulation were 23.8% (95% CI 21.4-26.4%) and 50.7% (95% CI 45.8-55.7%) respectively, and for survival to admission 13.8% (95% CI 12.2-15.5%) and 20.1% (95% CI 16.2-24.3%), respectively.
Conclusions: The results do not allow unambiguous recommendation of PoCUS as a predictor of resuscitation outcomes and further studies based on a large number of patients with full standardization of operators, their training and procedures performed were necessary.
期刊介绍:
Cardiology Journal is a scientific, peer-reviewed journal covering a broad spectrum of topics in cardiology. The journal has been published since 1994 and over the years it has become an internationally recognized journal of cardiological and medical community.
Cardiology Journal is the journal for practicing cardiologists, researchers, and young trainees benefiting from broad spectrum of useful educational content.