Mustafa Korkmaz, Melek K Eryılmaz, Mehmet Z Koçak, Muhammed M Er, Engin Hendem, Aykut Demirkıran, Murat Araz, Mustafa Karaağaç, Mehmet Artaç
{"title":"红细胞分布宽度能否预测接受血管内皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂一线治疗的转移性肾细胞癌患者的预后?","authors":"Mustafa Korkmaz, Melek K Eryılmaz, Mehmet Z Koçak, Muhammed M Er, Engin Hendem, Aykut Demirkıran, Murat Araz, Mustafa Karaağaç, Mehmet Artaç","doi":"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_898_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>It is red cell distribution width (RDW) that has been reported to show an inflammatory response which has been studied recently. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the pre-treatment RDW in patients using first-line vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR TKI) with the diagnosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) predicts treatment response and is a prognostic factor or not.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>About 92 patients diagnosed with mRCC who were being treated with sunitinib or pazopanib in the first line between January 2015 and June 2021 were included in the study. The patients were divided into 2 groups, as being ≤15.3 and >15.3, according to the RDW cut-off value calculated by ROC analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mOS of patients with a RDW of ≤15.3% was 45.0 (30.0-59.9) months, and of 21.3 (10.4-32.2) in those with a RDW of >15.3%. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). In the group of patients with a RDW of ≤15.3, median progression free survival (mPFS) (38.04 [16.3-59.7] months) was found to be significantly higher than those with a RDW of >15.3 (17.1 [11.8-22.5] months) (p = 0.04). In multivariate analysis, RDW level (≤15.3, >15.3), was determined to be prognostic markers (p = 0.022).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In mRCC patients, the RDW value measured before first-line VEGFR TKI therapy is an independent prognostic marker.</p>","PeriodicalId":15208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","volume":"19 Supplement","pages":"S0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does red blood cell distribution width predict prognosis in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients using first-line vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy?\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Korkmaz, Melek K Eryılmaz, Mehmet Z Koçak, Muhammed M Er, Engin Hendem, Aykut Demirkıran, Murat Araz, Mustafa Karaağaç, Mehmet Artaç\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_898_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>It is red cell distribution width (RDW) that has been reported to show an inflammatory response which has been studied recently. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the pre-treatment RDW in patients using first-line vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR TKI) with the diagnosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) predicts treatment response and is a prognostic factor or not.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>About 92 patients diagnosed with mRCC who were being treated with sunitinib or pazopanib in the first line between January 2015 and June 2021 were included in the study. The patients were divided into 2 groups, as being ≤15.3 and >15.3, according to the RDW cut-off value calculated by ROC analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mOS of patients with a RDW of ≤15.3% was 45.0 (30.0-59.9) months, and of 21.3 (10.4-32.2) in those with a RDW of >15.3%. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). In the group of patients with a RDW of ≤15.3, median progression free survival (mPFS) (38.04 [16.3-59.7] months) was found to be significantly higher than those with a RDW of >15.3 (17.1 [11.8-22.5] months) (p = 0.04). In multivariate analysis, RDW level (≤15.3, >15.3), was determined to be prognostic markers (p = 0.022).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In mRCC patients, the RDW value measured before first-line VEGFR TKI therapy is an independent prognostic marker.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"19 Supplement\",\"pages\":\"S0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_898_22\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer research and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_898_22","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does red blood cell distribution width predict prognosis in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients using first-line vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy?
Aim: It is red cell distribution width (RDW) that has been reported to show an inflammatory response which has been studied recently. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the pre-treatment RDW in patients using first-line vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR TKI) with the diagnosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) predicts treatment response and is a prognostic factor or not.
Methods: About 92 patients diagnosed with mRCC who were being treated with sunitinib or pazopanib in the first line between January 2015 and June 2021 were included in the study. The patients were divided into 2 groups, as being ≤15.3 and >15.3, according to the RDW cut-off value calculated by ROC analysis.
Results: The mOS of patients with a RDW of ≤15.3% was 45.0 (30.0-59.9) months, and of 21.3 (10.4-32.2) in those with a RDW of >15.3%. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). In the group of patients with a RDW of ≤15.3, median progression free survival (mPFS) (38.04 [16.3-59.7] months) was found to be significantly higher than those with a RDW of >15.3 (17.1 [11.8-22.5] months) (p = 0.04). In multivariate analysis, RDW level (≤15.3, >15.3), was determined to be prognostic markers (p = 0.022).
Conclusion: In mRCC patients, the RDW value measured before first-line VEGFR TKI therapy is an independent prognostic marker.
期刊介绍:
The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of Medical oncology, radiation oncology, medical imaging, radiation protection, non-ionising radiation, radiobiology. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.