Hyo Jin Lee, Seung Bin Kim, Hyun Woo Lee, Jung-Kyu Lee, Yong Won Seong, Eun Young Heo, Deog Kyeom Kim, Tae Yun Park
{"title":"基于重症监护医师主导的脑死亡供者的筛查与管理。","authors":"Hyo Jin Lee, Seung Bin Kim, Hyun Woo Lee, Jung-Kyu Lee, Yong Won Seong, Eun Young Heo, Deog Kyeom Kim, Tae Yun Park","doi":"10.12659/AOT.939521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the incidence of brain-dead (BD) donors and potential brain-dead (PBD) donors before vs after the introduction of intensivists. MATERIAL AND METHODS This longitudinal retrospective study was performed between January 2012 and December 2020 at Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center. Four dedicated intensivists were introduced in January 2016. The periods before and after introduction of the intensivists were defined as the pre-introduction period (2012-2015) and post-introduction period (2016-2020), respectively. RESULTS During the study period, there were 2872 discharges in the Intensive Care Unit, of which there were a total of 113 PBD (3.93%) and 36 BD (1.25%) donors. The number of PBD and BD donors increased in the post-introduction period compared in the pre-introduction period (PBD, 47.84 vs 27.14 per 1000 discharges; BD, 13.59 vs 11.03 per 1000 discharges). Poisson regression analysis showed the annual incidence rate of PBD donors significantly increased post-introduction (PBD, 27.53% vs 48.11%, P=0.044), while those of BD donors were similar between the 2 groups (BD, 11.41% vs 13.9%; P=0.743). The annual incidence rate of the total number of organ donations, multi-organ donations (>3 organs), and donation of organs (heart, lung, and kidney) increased in the post-introduction period compared to that in the pre-introduction period. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest a beneficial role of a dedicated intensivist, not only in improving actual organ donation and discovering PBD donors, but also in affecting the yield of the heart and lung transplantation in actual organ donation compared to donors without a dedicated intensivist.</p>","PeriodicalId":7935,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Transplantation","volume":"28 ","pages":"e939521"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fe/70/anntransplant-28-e939521.PMC10163827.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Incidence of Brain-Dead Donors Based on Screening and Management Led by Intensivists.\",\"authors\":\"Hyo Jin Lee, Seung Bin Kim, Hyun Woo Lee, Jung-Kyu Lee, Yong Won Seong, Eun Young Heo, Deog Kyeom Kim, Tae Yun Park\",\"doi\":\"10.12659/AOT.939521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the incidence of brain-dead (BD) donors and potential brain-dead (PBD) donors before vs after the introduction of intensivists. MATERIAL AND METHODS This longitudinal retrospective study was performed between January 2012 and December 2020 at Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center. Four dedicated intensivists were introduced in January 2016. The periods before and after introduction of the intensivists were defined as the pre-introduction period (2012-2015) and post-introduction period (2016-2020), respectively. RESULTS During the study period, there were 2872 discharges in the Intensive Care Unit, of which there were a total of 113 PBD (3.93%) and 36 BD (1.25%) donors. The number of PBD and BD donors increased in the post-introduction period compared in the pre-introduction period (PBD, 47.84 vs 27.14 per 1000 discharges; BD, 13.59 vs 11.03 per 1000 discharges). Poisson regression analysis showed the annual incidence rate of PBD donors significantly increased post-introduction (PBD, 27.53% vs 48.11%, P=0.044), while those of BD donors were similar between the 2 groups (BD, 11.41% vs 13.9%; P=0.743). The annual incidence rate of the total number of organ donations, multi-organ donations (>3 organs), and donation of organs (heart, lung, and kidney) increased in the post-introduction period compared to that in the pre-introduction period. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest a beneficial role of a dedicated intensivist, not only in improving actual organ donation and discovering PBD donors, but also in affecting the yield of the heart and lung transplantation in actual organ donation compared to donors without a dedicated intensivist.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"e939521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fe/70/anntransplant-28-e939521.PMC10163827.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12659/AOT.939521\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/AOT.939521","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在比较引入重症监护医师前后脑死亡(BD)供者和潜在脑死亡(PBD)供者的发生率。材料和方法本纵向回顾性研究于2012年1月至2020年12月在首尔市政府-首尔国立大学Boramae医疗中心进行。2016年1月引进了四名专门的重症监护医生。引入强化者前后分别定义为引入前(2012-2015年)和引入后(2016-2020年)。结果研究期间重症监护病房共出院2872例,其中PBD供者113例(3.93%),BD供者36例(1.25%)。与引入前相比,引入后PBD和BD供者的数量有所增加(PBD, 47.84 vs 27.14 / 1000次出院;BD, 13.59 vs 11.03 / 1000次排放)。泊松回归分析显示,引入后PBD供者的年发病率显著增加(PBD, 27.53% vs 48.11%, P=0.044),而两组之间BD供者的年发病率相似(BD, 11.41% vs 13.9%;P = 0.743)。器官捐献总数、多器官捐献(>3个器官)和器官(心、肺、肾)捐献的年发病率在引入后较引入前增加。结论:我们的研究结果表明,专职强化医生不仅在提高实际器官捐赠和发现PBD供者方面发挥了有益的作用,而且与没有专职强化医生的供者相比,在实际器官捐赠中也影响了心肺移植的产量。
The Incidence of Brain-Dead Donors Based on Screening and Management Led by Intensivists.
BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the incidence of brain-dead (BD) donors and potential brain-dead (PBD) donors before vs after the introduction of intensivists. MATERIAL AND METHODS This longitudinal retrospective study was performed between January 2012 and December 2020 at Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center. Four dedicated intensivists were introduced in January 2016. The periods before and after introduction of the intensivists were defined as the pre-introduction period (2012-2015) and post-introduction period (2016-2020), respectively. RESULTS During the study period, there were 2872 discharges in the Intensive Care Unit, of which there were a total of 113 PBD (3.93%) and 36 BD (1.25%) donors. The number of PBD and BD donors increased in the post-introduction period compared in the pre-introduction period (PBD, 47.84 vs 27.14 per 1000 discharges; BD, 13.59 vs 11.03 per 1000 discharges). Poisson regression analysis showed the annual incidence rate of PBD donors significantly increased post-introduction (PBD, 27.53% vs 48.11%, P=0.044), while those of BD donors were similar between the 2 groups (BD, 11.41% vs 13.9%; P=0.743). The annual incidence rate of the total number of organ donations, multi-organ donations (>3 organs), and donation of organs (heart, lung, and kidney) increased in the post-introduction period compared to that in the pre-introduction period. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest a beneficial role of a dedicated intensivist, not only in improving actual organ donation and discovering PBD donors, but also in affecting the yield of the heart and lung transplantation in actual organ donation compared to donors without a dedicated intensivist.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Transplantation is one of the fast-developing journals open to all scientists and fields of transplant medicine and related research. The journal is published quarterly and provides extensive coverage of the most important advances in transplantation.
Using an electronic on-line submission and peer review tracking system, Annals of Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The average time to first decision is around 3-4 weeks. Time to publication of accepted manuscripts continues to be shortened, with the Editorial team committed to a goal of 3 months from acceptance to publication.
Expert reseachers and clinicians from around the world contribute original Articles, Review Papers, Case Reports and Special Reports in every pertinent specialty, providing a lot of arguments for discussion of exciting developments and controversies in the field.