直肠癌手术切除患者预后图的开发和验证。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Pathology & Oncology Research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3389/pore.2023.1611014
Bochao Zhao, Jingchao Wang, Zhicheng Ma, Haikun Ye, Tao Yang, Kewei Meng
{"title":"直肠癌手术切除患者预后图的开发和验证。","authors":"Bochao Zhao,&nbsp;Jingchao Wang,&nbsp;Zhicheng Ma,&nbsp;Haikun Ye,&nbsp;Tao Yang,&nbsp;Kewei Meng","doi":"10.3389/pore.2023.1611014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a nomogram model for the prediction of survival outcome in rectal cancer patients who underwent surgical resection. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 9,919 consecutive patients were retrospectively identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Significant prognostic factors were determined by the univariate and multivariate Cox analysis. The nomogram model for the prediction of cancer-specific survival (CSS) in rectal cancer patients were developed based on these prognostic variables, and its predictive power was assessed by the concordance index (C-index). Calibration curves were plotted to evaluate the associations between predicted probabilities and actual observations. The internal and external cohort were used to further validate the predictive performance of the prognostic nomogram. <b>Results:</b> All patients from the SEER database were randomly split into a training cohort (<i>n</i> = 6,944) and an internal validation cohort (<i>n</i> = 2,975). The baseline characteristics of two cohorts was comparable. Independent prognostic factors were identified as age, pT stage, lymph node metastasis, serum CEA level, tumor size, differentiation type, perineural invasion, circumferential resection margin involvement and inadequate lymph node yield. In the training cohort, the C-index of the nomogram was 0.719 (95% CI: 0.696-0.742), which was significantly higher than that of the TNM staging system (C-index: 0.606, 95% CI: 0.583-0.629). The nomogram had a C-index of 0.726 (95% CI: 0.691-0.761) for the internal validation cohort, indicating a good predictive power. In addition, an independent cohort composed of 202 rectal cancer patients from our institution were enrolled as the external validation. Compared with the TNM staging system (C-index: 0.573, 95% CI: 0.492-0.654), the prognostic nomogram still showed a better predictive performance, with the C-index of 0.704 (95% CI: 0.626-0.782). Calibration plots showed a good consistency between predicted probability and the actual observation in the training and two validation cohorts. <b>Conclusion:</b> The nomogram showed an excellent predictive ability for survival outcome of rectal cancer patients, and it might provide an accurate prognostic stratification and help clinicians determine individualized treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19981,"journal":{"name":"Pathology & Oncology Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154568/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for rectal cancer patients who underwent surgical resection.\",\"authors\":\"Bochao Zhao,&nbsp;Jingchao Wang,&nbsp;Zhicheng Ma,&nbsp;Haikun Ye,&nbsp;Tao Yang,&nbsp;Kewei Meng\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/pore.2023.1611014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a nomogram model for the prediction of survival outcome in rectal cancer patients who underwent surgical resection. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 9,919 consecutive patients were retrospectively identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Significant prognostic factors were determined by the univariate and multivariate Cox analysis. The nomogram model for the prediction of cancer-specific survival (CSS) in rectal cancer patients were developed based on these prognostic variables, and its predictive power was assessed by the concordance index (C-index). Calibration curves were plotted to evaluate the associations between predicted probabilities and actual observations. The internal and external cohort were used to further validate the predictive performance of the prognostic nomogram. <b>Results:</b> All patients from the SEER database were randomly split into a training cohort (<i>n</i> = 6,944) and an internal validation cohort (<i>n</i> = 2,975). The baseline characteristics of two cohorts was comparable. Independent prognostic factors were identified as age, pT stage, lymph node metastasis, serum CEA level, tumor size, differentiation type, perineural invasion, circumferential resection margin involvement and inadequate lymph node yield. In the training cohort, the C-index of the nomogram was 0.719 (95% CI: 0.696-0.742), which was significantly higher than that of the TNM staging system (C-index: 0.606, 95% CI: 0.583-0.629). The nomogram had a C-index of 0.726 (95% CI: 0.691-0.761) for the internal validation cohort, indicating a good predictive power. In addition, an independent cohort composed of 202 rectal cancer patients from our institution were enrolled as the external validation. Compared with the TNM staging system (C-index: 0.573, 95% CI: 0.492-0.654), the prognostic nomogram still showed a better predictive performance, with the C-index of 0.704 (95% CI: 0.626-0.782). Calibration plots showed a good consistency between predicted probability and the actual observation in the training and two validation cohorts. <b>Conclusion:</b> The nomogram showed an excellent predictive ability for survival outcome of rectal cancer patients, and it might provide an accurate prognostic stratification and help clinicians determine individualized treatment strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathology & Oncology Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10154568/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathology & Oncology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/pore.2023.1611014\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology & Oncology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/pore.2023.1611014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是建立和验证一种预测直肠癌手术切除患者生存结果的nomogram模型。方法:使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库回顾性地确定了9919例连续患者。通过单因素和多因素Cox分析确定重要的预后因素。基于这些预后变量建立预测直肠癌患者癌症特异性生存(CSS)的nomogram模型,并通过一致性指数(C-index)评估其预测能力。绘制校准曲线以评估预测概率与实际观测值之间的关联。内部和外部队列被用来进一步验证预后nomogram的预测性能。结果:所有来自SEER数据库的患者被随机分为训练队列(n = 6,944)和内部验证队列(n = 2,975)。两个队列的基线特征具有可比性。独立预后因素确定为年龄,pT分期,淋巴结转移,血清CEA水平,肿瘤大小,分化类型,神经周围浸润,周围切除边缘受累和淋巴结不充分。在训练队列中,nomogram C-index为0.719 (95% CI: 0.696-0.742),显著高于TNM分期系统的C-index (C-index: 0.606, 95% CI: 0.583-0.629)。内部验证队列的nomogram C-index为0.726 (95% CI: 0.691-0.761),具有良好的预测能力。此外,我们还纳入了一个独立的队列作为外部验证,该队列由来自我们机构的202例直肠癌患者组成。与TNM分期系统(C-index: 0.573, 95% CI: 0.492-0.654)相比,预后nomogram仍具有更好的预测性能,C-index为0.704 (95% CI: 0.626-0.782)。校正图显示,在训练队列和两个验证队列中,预测概率与实际观测值具有良好的一致性。结论:nomogram对直肠癌患者的生存结局具有较好的预测能力,可以提供准确的预后分层,帮助临床医生确定个体化治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for rectal cancer patients who underwent surgical resection.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a nomogram model for the prediction of survival outcome in rectal cancer patients who underwent surgical resection. Methods: A total of 9,919 consecutive patients were retrospectively identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Significant prognostic factors were determined by the univariate and multivariate Cox analysis. The nomogram model for the prediction of cancer-specific survival (CSS) in rectal cancer patients were developed based on these prognostic variables, and its predictive power was assessed by the concordance index (C-index). Calibration curves were plotted to evaluate the associations between predicted probabilities and actual observations. The internal and external cohort were used to further validate the predictive performance of the prognostic nomogram. Results: All patients from the SEER database were randomly split into a training cohort (n = 6,944) and an internal validation cohort (n = 2,975). The baseline characteristics of two cohorts was comparable. Independent prognostic factors were identified as age, pT stage, lymph node metastasis, serum CEA level, tumor size, differentiation type, perineural invasion, circumferential resection margin involvement and inadequate lymph node yield. In the training cohort, the C-index of the nomogram was 0.719 (95% CI: 0.696-0.742), which was significantly higher than that of the TNM staging system (C-index: 0.606, 95% CI: 0.583-0.629). The nomogram had a C-index of 0.726 (95% CI: 0.691-0.761) for the internal validation cohort, indicating a good predictive power. In addition, an independent cohort composed of 202 rectal cancer patients from our institution were enrolled as the external validation. Compared with the TNM staging system (C-index: 0.573, 95% CI: 0.492-0.654), the prognostic nomogram still showed a better predictive performance, with the C-index of 0.704 (95% CI: 0.626-0.782). Calibration plots showed a good consistency between predicted probability and the actual observation in the training and two validation cohorts. Conclusion: The nomogram showed an excellent predictive ability for survival outcome of rectal cancer patients, and it might provide an accurate prognostic stratification and help clinicians determine individualized treatment strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
134
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pathology & Oncology Research (POR) is an interdisciplinary Journal at the interface of pathology and oncology including the preclinical and translational research, diagnostics and therapy. Furthermore, POR is an international forum for the rapid communication of reviews, original research, critical and topical reports with excellence and novelty. Published quarterly, POR is dedicated to keeping scientists informed of developments on the selected biomedical fields bridging the gap between basic research and clinical medicine. It is a special aim for POR to promote pathological and oncological publishing activity of colleagues in the Central and East European region. The journal will be of interest to pathologists, and a broad range of experimental and clinical oncologists, and related experts. POR is supported by an acknowledged international advisory board and the Arányi Fundation for modern pathology.
期刊最新文献
Molecular classification of endometrial cancer: preliminary experience from a single Portuguese academic center. Case report: A mesenchymal chondrosarcoma with alternative HEY1::NCOA2 fusions in the sella turcica. Intraoperative pyloric drainage is unnecessary during esophagectomies: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Molecular genetic investigation of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer patients in the Southern Transdanubian region: widening the mutation spectrum and searching for new pathogenic variants using next-generation methods. Corrigendum: Association between pathological characteristics and recurrence score by OncotypeDX in resected T1-3 and N0-1 breast cancer: a real-life experience of a North Hungarian regional center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1