人道主义空间的数字化和主权:技术、领土和紧张局势。

IF 3 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geopolitics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/14650045.2022.2047468
Aaron Martin, Gargi Sharma, Siddharth Peter de Souza, Linnet Taylor, Boudewijn van Eerd, Sean Martin McDonald, Massimo Marelli, Margie Cheesman, Stephan Scheel, Huub Dijstelbloem
{"title":"人道主义空间的数字化和主权:技术、领土和紧张局势。","authors":"Aaron Martin,&nbsp;Gargi Sharma,&nbsp;Siddharth Peter de Souza,&nbsp;Linnet Taylor,&nbsp;Boudewijn van Eerd,&nbsp;Sean Martin McDonald,&nbsp;Massimo Marelli,&nbsp;Margie Cheesman,&nbsp;Stephan Scheel,&nbsp;Huub Dijstelbloem","doi":"10.1080/14650045.2022.2047468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Debates are ongoing on the limits of - and possibilities for - sovereignty in the digital era. While most observers spotlight the implications of the Internet, cryptocurrencies, artificial intelligence/machine learning and advanced data analytics for the sovereignty of nation states, a critical yet under examined question concerns what digital innovations mean for authority, power and control in the humanitarian sphere in which different rules, values and expectations are thought to apply. This forum brings together practitioners and scholars to explore both conceptually and empirically how digitisation and datafication in aid are (re)shaping notions of sovereign power in humanitarian space. The forum's contributors challenge established understandings of sovereignty in new forms of digital humanitarian action. Among other focus areas, the forum draws attention to how cyber dependencies threaten international humanitarian organisations' purported digital sovereignty. It also contests the potential of technologies like blockchain to revolutionise notions of sovereignty in humanitarian assistance and hypothesises about the ineluctable parasitic qualities of humanitarian technology. The forum concludes by proposing that digital technologies deployed in migration contexts might be understood as 'sovereignty experiments'. We invite readers from scholarly, policy and practitioner communities alike to engage closely with these critical perspectives on digitisation and sovereignty in humanitarian space.</p>","PeriodicalId":47839,"journal":{"name":"Geopolitics","volume":"28 3","pages":"1362-1397"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ed/c9/FGEO_28_2047468.PMC10153061.pdf","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digitisation and Sovereignty in Humanitarian Space: Technologies, Territories and Tensions.\",\"authors\":\"Aaron Martin,&nbsp;Gargi Sharma,&nbsp;Siddharth Peter de Souza,&nbsp;Linnet Taylor,&nbsp;Boudewijn van Eerd,&nbsp;Sean Martin McDonald,&nbsp;Massimo Marelli,&nbsp;Margie Cheesman,&nbsp;Stephan Scheel,&nbsp;Huub Dijstelbloem\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14650045.2022.2047468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Debates are ongoing on the limits of - and possibilities for - sovereignty in the digital era. While most observers spotlight the implications of the Internet, cryptocurrencies, artificial intelligence/machine learning and advanced data analytics for the sovereignty of nation states, a critical yet under examined question concerns what digital innovations mean for authority, power and control in the humanitarian sphere in which different rules, values and expectations are thought to apply. This forum brings together practitioners and scholars to explore both conceptually and empirically how digitisation and datafication in aid are (re)shaping notions of sovereign power in humanitarian space. The forum's contributors challenge established understandings of sovereignty in new forms of digital humanitarian action. Among other focus areas, the forum draws attention to how cyber dependencies threaten international humanitarian organisations' purported digital sovereignty. It also contests the potential of technologies like blockchain to revolutionise notions of sovereignty in humanitarian assistance and hypothesises about the ineluctable parasitic qualities of humanitarian technology. The forum concludes by proposing that digital technologies deployed in migration contexts might be understood as 'sovereignty experiments'. We invite readers from scholarly, policy and practitioner communities alike to engage closely with these critical perspectives on digitisation and sovereignty in humanitarian space.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geopolitics\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"1362-1397\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ed/c9/FGEO_28_2047468.PMC10153061.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geopolitics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2022.2047468\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geopolitics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2022.2047468","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

关于数字时代主权的极限和可能性的辩论正在进行。虽然大多数观察家都关注互联网、加密货币、人工智能/机器学习和高级数据分析对民族国家主权的影响,但一个关键但尚未得到研究的问题是,数字创新对人道主义领域的权威、权力和控制意味着什么,在人道主义领域,不同的规则、价值观和期望被认为适用。本次论坛将从业者和学者聚集在一起,从概念上和经验上探讨援助中的数字化和数据化如何(重新)塑造人道主义空间中的主权权力概念。论坛的贡献者以新形式的数字人道主义行动挑战对主权的既定理解。在其他重点领域中,论坛提请注意网络依赖如何威胁国际人道主义组织所谓的数字主权。它还对区块链等技术在人道主义援助中彻底改变主权概念的潜力提出了质疑,并对人道主义技术不可避免的寄生特性提出了假设。论坛最后提出,在移民背景下部署的数字技术可以被理解为“主权实验”。我们邀请来自学术、政策和实践者社区的读者密切关注这些关于人道主义空间的数字化和主权的关键观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digitisation and Sovereignty in Humanitarian Space: Technologies, Territories and Tensions.

Debates are ongoing on the limits of - and possibilities for - sovereignty in the digital era. While most observers spotlight the implications of the Internet, cryptocurrencies, artificial intelligence/machine learning and advanced data analytics for the sovereignty of nation states, a critical yet under examined question concerns what digital innovations mean for authority, power and control in the humanitarian sphere in which different rules, values and expectations are thought to apply. This forum brings together practitioners and scholars to explore both conceptually and empirically how digitisation and datafication in aid are (re)shaping notions of sovereign power in humanitarian space. The forum's contributors challenge established understandings of sovereignty in new forms of digital humanitarian action. Among other focus areas, the forum draws attention to how cyber dependencies threaten international humanitarian organisations' purported digital sovereignty. It also contests the potential of technologies like blockchain to revolutionise notions of sovereignty in humanitarian assistance and hypothesises about the ineluctable parasitic qualities of humanitarian technology. The forum concludes by proposing that digital technologies deployed in migration contexts might be understood as 'sovereignty experiments'. We invite readers from scholarly, policy and practitioner communities alike to engage closely with these critical perspectives on digitisation and sovereignty in humanitarian space.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geopolitics
Geopolitics Multiple-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The study of geopolitics has undergone a major renaissance during the past decade. Addressing a gap in the published periodical literature, this journal seeks to explore the theoretical implications of contemporary geopolitics and geopolitical change with particular reference to territorial problems and issues of state sovereignty . Multidisciplinary in its scope, Geopolitics includes all aspects of the social sciences with particular emphasis on political geography, international relations, the territorial aspects of political science and international law. The journal seeks to maintain a healthy balance between systemic and regional analysis.
期刊最新文献
From ‘Territorial Peace’ to ‘Total Peace’ in Colombia: A Geopolitical Balance Between ‘ Trochas ’, Orphans and Mourning: Migrant Mobilities and the Effects of US ‘Soft’ Remote Control in Ecuador Regionalism and Alliances in the Middle East, 2011-2021: From a “Flash in the Pan” of Regional Cooperation to Liquid Alliances Veterans, Families and the Domestic Geopolitics of Remembering War Entangled Vulnerabilities: Gendered and Racialised Bodies and Borders in EU External Border Security
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1