数字技术与不同材料制造的可摘局部义齿金属架的真性与精度评价。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.4047/jap.2023.15.2.55
Leonardo Ciocca, Mattia Maltauro, Elena Pierantozzi, Lorenzo Breschi, Angela Montanari, Laura Anderlucci, Roberto Meneghello
{"title":"数字技术与不同材料制造的可摘局部义齿金属架的真性与精度评价。","authors":"Leonardo Ciocca,&nbsp;Mattia Maltauro,&nbsp;Elena Pierantozzi,&nbsp;Lorenzo Breschi,&nbsp;Angela Montanari,&nbsp;Laura Anderlucci,&nbsp;Roberto Meneghello","doi":"10.4047/jap.2023.15.2.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks produced using different digital protocols.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>80 frameworks for RPDs were produced using CAD-CAM technology and divided into four groups of twenty (n = 20): Group 1, Titanium frameworks manufactured by digital metal laser sintering (DMLS); Group 2, Co-Cr frameworks manufactured by DMLS; Group 3, Polyamide PA12 castable resin manufactured by multi-jet fusion (MJF); and Group 4, Metal (Co-Cr) casting by using lost-wax technique. After the digital acquisition, eight specific areas were selected in order to measure the Δ-error value at the intaglio surface of RPD. The minimum value required for point sampling density (0.4 mm) was derived from the sensitivity analysis. The obtained Δ-error mean value was used for comparisons: 1. between different manufacturing processes; 2. between different manufacturing techniques in the same area of interest (AOI); and 3. between different AOI of the same group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Δ-error mean value of each group ranged between -0.002 (Ti) and 0.041 (Co-Cr) mm. The Pearson's Chi-squared test revealed significant differences considering all groups paired two by two, except for group 3 and 4. The multiple comparison test documented a significant difference for each AOI among group 1, 3, and 4. The multiple comparison test showed significant differences among almost all different AOIs of each group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All Δ-mean error values of all digital protocols for manufacturing RPD frameworks optimally fit within the clinical tolerance limit of trueness and precision.</p>","PeriodicalId":51291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","volume":"15 2","pages":"55-62"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e7/6b/jap-15-55.PMC10154145.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of trueness and precision of removable partial denture metal frameworks manufactured with digital technology and different materials.\",\"authors\":\"Leonardo Ciocca,&nbsp;Mattia Maltauro,&nbsp;Elena Pierantozzi,&nbsp;Lorenzo Breschi,&nbsp;Angela Montanari,&nbsp;Laura Anderlucci,&nbsp;Roberto Meneghello\",\"doi\":\"10.4047/jap.2023.15.2.55\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks produced using different digital protocols.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>80 frameworks for RPDs were produced using CAD-CAM technology and divided into four groups of twenty (n = 20): Group 1, Titanium frameworks manufactured by digital metal laser sintering (DMLS); Group 2, Co-Cr frameworks manufactured by DMLS; Group 3, Polyamide PA12 castable resin manufactured by multi-jet fusion (MJF); and Group 4, Metal (Co-Cr) casting by using lost-wax technique. After the digital acquisition, eight specific areas were selected in order to measure the Δ-error value at the intaglio surface of RPD. The minimum value required for point sampling density (0.4 mm) was derived from the sensitivity analysis. The obtained Δ-error mean value was used for comparisons: 1. between different manufacturing processes; 2. between different manufacturing techniques in the same area of interest (AOI); and 3. between different AOI of the same group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Δ-error mean value of each group ranged between -0.002 (Ti) and 0.041 (Co-Cr) mm. The Pearson's Chi-squared test revealed significant differences considering all groups paired two by two, except for group 3 and 4. The multiple comparison test documented a significant difference for each AOI among group 1, 3, and 4. The multiple comparison test showed significant differences among almost all different AOIs of each group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All Δ-mean error values of all digital protocols for manufacturing RPD frameworks optimally fit within the clinical tolerance limit of trueness and precision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"55-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e7/6b/jap-15-55.PMC10154145.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2023.15.2.55\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2023.15.2.55","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估使用不同数字协议生产的可摘局部义齿(RPD)框架的准确性。材料与方法:采用CAD-CAM技术制作了80个rpd框架,分为四组,每组20个(n = 20):第一组,采用数字金属激光烧结(DMLS)制造钛合金框架;第二组,DMLS制造的Co-Cr框架;第3组:多喷流熔融法制备聚酰胺PA12浇注树脂;第四组:金属(Co-Cr)失蜡铸造。数字采集后,选择8个特定区域,测量RPD凹版表面的Δ-error值。点采样密度所需的最小值(0.4 mm)由灵敏度分析得出。得到的Δ-error平均值用于比较:1。在不同的制造过程之间;2. 在同一兴趣领域(AOI)的不同制造技术之间;和3。同一组不同AOI之间的差异。结果:Δ-error各组的平均值在-0.002 (Ti)和0.041 (Co-Cr) mm之间。Pearson卡方检验显示,除第3组和第4组外,所有2对2配对的组均存在显著差异。多重比较检验记录了1、3、4组AOI的显著差异。多重比较检验显示,各组不同aoi之间几乎都存在显著差异。结论:制造RPD框架的所有数字方案的Δ-mean误差值均符合临床对真实感和精度的容忍极限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of trueness and precision of removable partial denture metal frameworks manufactured with digital technology and different materials.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of removable partial denture (RPD) frameworks produced using different digital protocols.

Materials and methods: 80 frameworks for RPDs were produced using CAD-CAM technology and divided into four groups of twenty (n = 20): Group 1, Titanium frameworks manufactured by digital metal laser sintering (DMLS); Group 2, Co-Cr frameworks manufactured by DMLS; Group 3, Polyamide PA12 castable resin manufactured by multi-jet fusion (MJF); and Group 4, Metal (Co-Cr) casting by using lost-wax technique. After the digital acquisition, eight specific areas were selected in order to measure the Δ-error value at the intaglio surface of RPD. The minimum value required for point sampling density (0.4 mm) was derived from the sensitivity analysis. The obtained Δ-error mean value was used for comparisons: 1. between different manufacturing processes; 2. between different manufacturing techniques in the same area of interest (AOI); and 3. between different AOI of the same group.

Results: The Δ-error mean value of each group ranged between -0.002 (Ti) and 0.041 (Co-Cr) mm. The Pearson's Chi-squared test revealed significant differences considering all groups paired two by two, except for group 3 and 4. The multiple comparison test documented a significant difference for each AOI among group 1, 3, and 4. The multiple comparison test showed significant differences among almost all different AOIs of each group.

Conclusion: All Δ-mean error values of all digital protocols for manufacturing RPD frameworks optimally fit within the clinical tolerance limit of trueness and precision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: This journal aims to convey scientific and clinical progress in the field of prosthodontics and its related areas to many dental communities concerned with esthetic and functional restorations, occlusion, implants, prostheses, and biomaterials related to prosthodontics. This journal publishes • Original research data of high scientific merit in the field of diagnosis, function, esthetics and stomatognathic physiology related to prosthodontic rehabilitation, physiology and mechanics of occlusion, mechanical and biologic aspects of prosthodontic materials including dental implants. • Review articles by experts on controversies and new developments in prosthodontics. • Case reports if they provide or document new fundamental knowledge.
期刊最新文献
A study to evaluate the influence of non-axial forces on tooth - a split mouth cross-sectional study. Comparison of osseointegration in commercial SLA-treated dental implants with different surface roughness: a pilot study in beagle dogs. Effect of scan path on accuracy of complete arch intraoral scan. Erratum - Effect of reference objects on the accuracy of digital implant impressions in partially edentulous arches. Evaluating the microgap and sealing capability in four implant systems with different interlockings under different tightening torques: an in-vitro study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1