{"title":"脚部姿势指数(FPI-6)--土耳其语版的翻译、有效性和可靠性。","authors":"Güllü Aydin Yağcioğlu, Merve Karapınar","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2023.2207109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to translate the English version of the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) into Turkish and to examine its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After the forward-backward translation process, the internal consistency and intra - and inter-rater reliability were evaluated by using Cronbach's α and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC<sub>2,k</sub>) (two-way random effects model with absolute agreement type), respectively. The agreement between reliability assessments was investigated by the standard error of measurement (SEM) and the minimal detectable change (MDC<sub>95%</sub>). Criterion validity was assessed in relationship between the Turkish FPI-6 and Foot Function Index (FFI) and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study was completed with 45 patients with foot/ankle problems. The internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.85; 0.78, respectively), intra-reliability (ICC<sub>2,k</sub> = 0.96; 0.94, respectively), and inter-reliability (ICC<sub>2,k</sub> = 0.93; both of them) of the Turkish version of the FPI-6 were excellent for the dominant and non-dominant lower limb. The SEM was low, and the agreement was considered to have high absolute reliability, as demonstrated by the smallest change in measurement error. The Turkish FPI-6 also had moderate correlations with the FFI and AOFAS (<i>p</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It has been proven that the Turkish FPI-6 is valid and reliable and can be used by Turkish-speaking researchers and clinicians in patients with various foot-ankle problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translation, validity, and reliability of the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) - Turkish version.\",\"authors\":\"Güllü Aydin Yağcioğlu, Merve Karapınar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593985.2023.2207109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to translate the English version of the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) into Turkish and to examine its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After the forward-backward translation process, the internal consistency and intra - and inter-rater reliability were evaluated by using Cronbach's α and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC<sub>2,k</sub>) (two-way random effects model with absolute agreement type), respectively. The agreement between reliability assessments was investigated by the standard error of measurement (SEM) and the minimal detectable change (MDC<sub>95%</sub>). Criterion validity was assessed in relationship between the Turkish FPI-6 and Foot Function Index (FFI) and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study was completed with 45 patients with foot/ankle problems. The internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.85; 0.78, respectively), intra-reliability (ICC<sub>2,k</sub> = 0.96; 0.94, respectively), and inter-reliability (ICC<sub>2,k</sub> = 0.93; both of them) of the Turkish version of the FPI-6 were excellent for the dominant and non-dominant lower limb. The SEM was low, and the agreement was considered to have high absolute reliability, as demonstrated by the smallest change in measurement error. The Turkish FPI-6 also had moderate correlations with the FFI and AOFAS (<i>p</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It has been proven that the Turkish FPI-6 is valid and reliable and can be used by Turkish-speaking researchers and clinicians in patients with various foot-ankle problems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2207109\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2207109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Translation, validity, and reliability of the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) - Turkish version.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to translate the English version of the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) into Turkish and to examine its psychometric properties.
Methods: After the forward-backward translation process, the internal consistency and intra - and inter-rater reliability were evaluated by using Cronbach's α and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC2,k) (two-way random effects model with absolute agreement type), respectively. The agreement between reliability assessments was investigated by the standard error of measurement (SEM) and the minimal detectable change (MDC95%). Criterion validity was assessed in relationship between the Turkish FPI-6 and Foot Function Index (FFI) and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS).
Results: The study was completed with 45 patients with foot/ankle problems. The internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.85; 0.78, respectively), intra-reliability (ICC2,k = 0.96; 0.94, respectively), and inter-reliability (ICC2,k = 0.93; both of them) of the Turkish version of the FPI-6 were excellent for the dominant and non-dominant lower limb. The SEM was low, and the agreement was considered to have high absolute reliability, as demonstrated by the smallest change in measurement error. The Turkish FPI-6 also had moderate correlations with the FFI and AOFAS (p < .05).
Conclusions: It has been proven that the Turkish FPI-6 is valid and reliable and can be used by Turkish-speaking researchers and clinicians in patients with various foot-ankle problems.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.