识别精神病患者的受害概况和童年创伤史:潜在阶级分析。

Georgina L Barnes, Richard Emsley, Philippa Garety, Amy Hardy
{"title":"识别精神病患者的受害概况和童年创伤史:潜在阶级分析。","authors":"Georgina L Barnes,&nbsp;Richard Emsley,&nbsp;Philippa Garety,&nbsp;Amy Hardy","doi":"10.1080/17522439.2021.2009903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with psychosis experience higher rates of childhood victimisation compared to the general population, which may impact on mental health and recovery. This study aimed to identify childhood victimisation profiles in a clinical sample to inform recommendations for routine care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 146 adults (ages 19-65 years; M = 42.2) with schizophrenia-spectrum diagnoses reporting trauma. Childhood trauma was assessed using two retrospective measures, and a latent class analysis (LCA) was performed on four trauma types (sexual abuse, emotional abuse, physical abuse and neglect). Multinomial logistic regression investigated demographic differences between the classes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four distinct childhood trauma classes were identified: Emotional abuse/neglect (n = 29); physical abuse (n = 14); sexual abuse (n = 19); and poly-victimisation (n = 84). There were no differences between the classes in terms of age, ethnicity, relationship status, education or current employment (relative risk (RR) = 0.85-1.27, <i>p</i> > 0.05). Participants in the poly-victimisation class were significantly more likely to be female (RR = 0.22-0.28, <i>p</i> < 0.04).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Adults with psychosis, particularly females, are likely to report poly-victimisation in childhood. This highlights the need to comprehensively but concisely assess experiences of abuse and neglect in clinical care, in line with trauma-informed approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":46344,"journal":{"name":"Psychosis-Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9988302/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying victimisation profiles in people with psychosis and a history of childhood trauma: a latent class analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Georgina L Barnes,&nbsp;Richard Emsley,&nbsp;Philippa Garety,&nbsp;Amy Hardy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17522439.2021.2009903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with psychosis experience higher rates of childhood victimisation compared to the general population, which may impact on mental health and recovery. This study aimed to identify childhood victimisation profiles in a clinical sample to inform recommendations for routine care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 146 adults (ages 19-65 years; M = 42.2) with schizophrenia-spectrum diagnoses reporting trauma. Childhood trauma was assessed using two retrospective measures, and a latent class analysis (LCA) was performed on four trauma types (sexual abuse, emotional abuse, physical abuse and neglect). Multinomial logistic regression investigated demographic differences between the classes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four distinct childhood trauma classes were identified: Emotional abuse/neglect (n = 29); physical abuse (n = 14); sexual abuse (n = 19); and poly-victimisation (n = 84). There were no differences between the classes in terms of age, ethnicity, relationship status, education or current employment (relative risk (RR) = 0.85-1.27, <i>p</i> > 0.05). Participants in the poly-victimisation class were significantly more likely to be female (RR = 0.22-0.28, <i>p</i> < 0.04).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Adults with psychosis, particularly females, are likely to report poly-victimisation in childhood. This highlights the need to comprehensively but concisely assess experiences of abuse and neglect in clinical care, in line with trauma-informed approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46344,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychosis-Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9988302/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychosis-Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17522439.2021.2009903\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychosis-Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17522439.2021.2009903","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:与一般人群相比,精神病患者的儿童期受害率更高,这可能会影响心理健康和康复。本研究旨在确定临床样本中的儿童受害概况,为常规护理提供建议。方法:参与者为146名成年人(年龄19-65岁;M = 42.2),精神分裂症谱系诊断报告创伤。采用两种回顾性方法评估儿童创伤,并对四种创伤类型(性虐待、情感虐待、身体虐待和忽视)进行潜在分类分析(LCA)。多项逻辑回归调查了各阶层之间的人口统计学差异。结果:确定了四种不同的儿童创伤类别:情感虐待/忽视(n = 29);身体虐待(n = 14);性虐待(n = 19);以及多重受害(n = 84)。各阶层在年龄、种族、婚姻状况、教育程度、当前就业等方面无差异(相对危险度RR = 0.85 ~ 1.27, p > 0.05)。多重受害班的参与者明显更有可能是女性(RR = 0.22-0.28, p)。讨论:患有精神病的成年人,尤其是女性,很可能在童年时期报告多重受害。这突出了在临床护理中全面而简洁地评估虐待和忽视经验的必要性,符合创伤知情方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identifying victimisation profiles in people with psychosis and a history of childhood trauma: a latent class analysis.

Background: People with psychosis experience higher rates of childhood victimisation compared to the general population, which may impact on mental health and recovery. This study aimed to identify childhood victimisation profiles in a clinical sample to inform recommendations for routine care.

Methods: Participants were 146 adults (ages 19-65 years; M = 42.2) with schizophrenia-spectrum diagnoses reporting trauma. Childhood trauma was assessed using two retrospective measures, and a latent class analysis (LCA) was performed on four trauma types (sexual abuse, emotional abuse, physical abuse and neglect). Multinomial logistic regression investigated demographic differences between the classes.

Results: Four distinct childhood trauma classes were identified: Emotional abuse/neglect (n = 29); physical abuse (n = 14); sexual abuse (n = 19); and poly-victimisation (n = 84). There were no differences between the classes in terms of age, ethnicity, relationship status, education or current employment (relative risk (RR) = 0.85-1.27, p > 0.05). Participants in the poly-victimisation class were significantly more likely to be female (RR = 0.22-0.28, p < 0.04).

Discussion: Adults with psychosis, particularly females, are likely to report poly-victimisation in childhood. This highlights the need to comprehensively but concisely assess experiences of abuse and neglect in clinical care, in line with trauma-informed approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
The impact of familial involvement on dropout in a culturally informed group therapy for people diagnosed with 'schizophrenia'. A mixed-methods validation of the 15-item English version of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR) in an adult mental health inpatient rehabilitation setting Exploring service users’ and practitioners’ priorities regarding outcomes of cognitive behavioural therapy for distressing voices: a thematic analysis The association between social identity and paranoia through the mediators of trust and hostile attribution bias in a UK general population study Exploring personal accounts of the facilitators and barriers to seeking help for first-episode psychosis (FEP): a meta-ethnography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1