{"title":"中医有一个术语，需要标准化的英语对应的说法的主要论点","authors":"Nigel Wiseman","doi":"10.1054/caom.2001.0081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many of the ideas that I have presented in this series of papers have been expressed before. A growing number of people are receptive to them. Some, though, are still reluctant to accept them. The most commonly heard contentions, and my answers to them, run as follows.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100265,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 98-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1054/caom.2001.0081","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Main contentions to the claim that Chinese medicine has a terminology requiring standardized English equivalents\",\"authors\":\"Nigel Wiseman\",\"doi\":\"10.1054/caom.2001.0081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Many of the ideas that I have presented in this series of papers have been expressed before. A growing number of people are receptive to them. Some, though, are still reluctant to accept them. The most commonly heard contentions, and my answers to them, run as follows.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 98-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1054/caom.2001.0081\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1461144901900817\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1461144901900817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Main contentions to the claim that Chinese medicine has a terminology requiring standardized English equivalents
Many of the ideas that I have presented in this series of papers have been expressed before. A growing number of people are receptive to them. Some, though, are still reluctant to accept them. The most commonly heard contentions, and my answers to them, run as follows.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
