机器人辅助与传统开放肾移植:中位随访5年的倾向匹配比较。

IF 1.5 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY American journal of clinical and experimental urology Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Abhijit Patil, Arvind Ganpule, Abhishek Singh, Anshul Agrawal, Pratik Patel, Nitiraj Shete, Ravindra Sabnis, Mahesh Desai
{"title":"机器人辅助与传统开放肾移植:中位随访5年的倾向匹配比较。","authors":"Abhijit Patil,&nbsp;Arvind Ganpule,&nbsp;Abhishek Singh,&nbsp;Anshul Agrawal,&nbsp;Pratik Patel,&nbsp;Nitiraj Shete,&nbsp;Ravindra Sabnis,&nbsp;Mahesh Desai","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>RAKT is a relatively newer approach for kidney transplant and has to be proven against the established approach, OKT. RAKT may be beneficial in obese patients as described in literature. Hence, we compared pre-, intra- and postoperative parameters with one year follow-up of both approaches by propensity matching similar characteristics patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of 28 OKT and 28 RAKT propensity matched patients was collected during 2014 to 2022 through the institutional transplant registry. OKT and RAKT patients were propensity matched for confounding factors like donor age, eGFR, side along with recipient age, BMI and comorbidities. All graft kidneys were harvested laparoscopically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the groups were comparable in terms of recipient age and BMI, donor age, creatinine, BMI, eGFR and comorbidities. Total ischemia time (P<0.001) and postoperative day (POD) 1 creatinine (P<0.001) was significantly more in RAKT. However, postoperative 1 month (P=0.12), 3 months (P=0.60) and 1 year (P=0.10) creatinine was comparable in both approaches. Postoperative complications (P=0.90) including hemoglobin drop (P=0.72) were comparable in both the groups. The days to half the creatinine from preoperative values was significantly less in OKT group (P=0.009). Serum Tacrolimus levels at day 3 (P=0.08) and day 7 (P=0.112) were also comparable in both the groups. Graft survival was 78.5% in OKT group and 82.14% in RAKT group with median follow-up of 60 months in both the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this comprehensive propensity matched analysis of RAKT with OKT, we conclude that RAKT has similar outcomes as OKT at 1 year and 5 years follow-up. CIT, TIT, time to half creatinine and POD 1 creatinine values were higher in RAKT group, but eventually have comparable outcomes at further follow-up. Thus, RAKT, a novel approach is non-inferior to established OKT approach. However, further larger trials are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":7438,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","volume":"11 2","pages":"168-176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10165225/pdf/ajceu0011-0168.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robot-assisted versus conventional open kidney transplantation: a propensity matched comparison with median follow-up of 5 years.\",\"authors\":\"Abhijit Patil,&nbsp;Arvind Ganpule,&nbsp;Abhishek Singh,&nbsp;Anshul Agrawal,&nbsp;Pratik Patel,&nbsp;Nitiraj Shete,&nbsp;Ravindra Sabnis,&nbsp;Mahesh Desai\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>RAKT is a relatively newer approach for kidney transplant and has to be proven against the established approach, OKT. RAKT may be beneficial in obese patients as described in literature. Hence, we compared pre-, intra- and postoperative parameters with one year follow-up of both approaches by propensity matching similar characteristics patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of 28 OKT and 28 RAKT propensity matched patients was collected during 2014 to 2022 through the institutional transplant registry. OKT and RAKT patients were propensity matched for confounding factors like donor age, eGFR, side along with recipient age, BMI and comorbidities. All graft kidneys were harvested laparoscopically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the groups were comparable in terms of recipient age and BMI, donor age, creatinine, BMI, eGFR and comorbidities. Total ischemia time (P<0.001) and postoperative day (POD) 1 creatinine (P<0.001) was significantly more in RAKT. However, postoperative 1 month (P=0.12), 3 months (P=0.60) and 1 year (P=0.10) creatinine was comparable in both approaches. Postoperative complications (P=0.90) including hemoglobin drop (P=0.72) were comparable in both the groups. The days to half the creatinine from preoperative values was significantly less in OKT group (P=0.009). Serum Tacrolimus levels at day 3 (P=0.08) and day 7 (P=0.112) were also comparable in both the groups. Graft survival was 78.5% in OKT group and 82.14% in RAKT group with median follow-up of 60 months in both the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this comprehensive propensity matched analysis of RAKT with OKT, we conclude that RAKT has similar outcomes as OKT at 1 year and 5 years follow-up. CIT, TIT, time to half creatinine and POD 1 creatinine values were higher in RAKT group, but eventually have comparable outcomes at further follow-up. Thus, RAKT, a novel approach is non-inferior to established OKT approach. However, further larger trials are required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of clinical and experimental urology\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"168-176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10165225/pdf/ajceu0011-0168.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of clinical and experimental urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical and experimental urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:RAKT是一种相对较新的肾脏移植方法,并且必须与既定的方法OKT相比较。如文献所述,RAKT可能对肥胖患者有益。因此,我们通过倾向匹配相似特征的患者,比较了两种方法的术前、术中和术后一年随访参数。方法:通过机构移植登记处收集2014年至2022年28例OKT和28例RAKT倾向匹配患者的数据。OKT和RAKT患者在供体年龄、eGFR、受体年龄、BMI和合并症等混杂因素上倾向匹配。所有移植肾均在腹腔镜下摘取。结果:两组在受体年龄和BMI、供体年龄、肌酐、BMI、eGFR和合并症方面具有可比性。结论:在RAKT和OKT的综合倾向匹配分析中,我们得出结论,RAKT在1年和5年随访时的结果与OKT相似。在RAKT组中,CIT、TIT、到一半时间肌酐和POD 1肌酐值较高,但在进一步随访中最终具有相当的结果。因此,RAKT,一种新颖的方法是不逊色于既定的OKT方法。然而,还需要更大规模的试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Robot-assisted versus conventional open kidney transplantation: a propensity matched comparison with median follow-up of 5 years.

Background: RAKT is a relatively newer approach for kidney transplant and has to be proven against the established approach, OKT. RAKT may be beneficial in obese patients as described in literature. Hence, we compared pre-, intra- and postoperative parameters with one year follow-up of both approaches by propensity matching similar characteristics patients.

Methods: Data of 28 OKT and 28 RAKT propensity matched patients was collected during 2014 to 2022 through the institutional transplant registry. OKT and RAKT patients were propensity matched for confounding factors like donor age, eGFR, side along with recipient age, BMI and comorbidities. All graft kidneys were harvested laparoscopically.

Results: Both the groups were comparable in terms of recipient age and BMI, donor age, creatinine, BMI, eGFR and comorbidities. Total ischemia time (P<0.001) and postoperative day (POD) 1 creatinine (P<0.001) was significantly more in RAKT. However, postoperative 1 month (P=0.12), 3 months (P=0.60) and 1 year (P=0.10) creatinine was comparable in both approaches. Postoperative complications (P=0.90) including hemoglobin drop (P=0.72) were comparable in both the groups. The days to half the creatinine from preoperative values was significantly less in OKT group (P=0.009). Serum Tacrolimus levels at day 3 (P=0.08) and day 7 (P=0.112) were also comparable in both the groups. Graft survival was 78.5% in OKT group and 82.14% in RAKT group with median follow-up of 60 months in both the groups.

Conclusion: In this comprehensive propensity matched analysis of RAKT with OKT, we conclude that RAKT has similar outcomes as OKT at 1 year and 5 years follow-up. CIT, TIT, time to half creatinine and POD 1 creatinine values were higher in RAKT group, but eventually have comparable outcomes at further follow-up. Thus, RAKT, a novel approach is non-inferior to established OKT approach. However, further larger trials are required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Mendelian randomisation approach to explore genetic factors associated with erectile dysfunction based on pooled genomic data. Administering antibiotic-loaded irrigation fluid as an alternative for prophylactic intravenous antibiotics in transurethral ureterolithotripsy (TUL): a randomized controlled trial. Decreased expression of LncRNA CRYM-AS1 promotes apoptosis through the Hippo-YAP1 signaling pathway leading to diabetic erectile dysfunction. Minimally invasive management of extraperitoneal bladder injury with extension to the trigone of the bladder with bilateral external ureteral catheterization: innovative approach instead of open surgical treatment. N4-acetyl-sulfamethoxazole stone in a patient on chronic trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole therapy: a case report and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1