Patrícia Avelar Viana Espindula, Alessandra de Carvalho Bastone, Ana Paula Santos
{"title":"脊髓损伤患者参与量表(P-scale)的结构有效性和可靠性。","authors":"Patrícia Avelar Viana Espindula, Alessandra de Carvalho Bastone, Ana Paula Santos","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2023.2183327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the reliability and the construct validity of the Participation Scale (P-scale) in adults with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>: SARAH Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals, Brazil.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>: One hundred individuals with SCI.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>: Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>: Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were investigated. To assess reliability the P-scale was applied twice with a one-week interval. To assess construct validity the Functional Independence Measure, the Beck Depression Inventory, and the Accessibility Perception Questionnaire were administered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the participants was 38.9 ± 12.80 years. The majority were male (70%) and had traumatic injuries (74%). The P-scale showed significant correlations with the Functional Independence Measure motor domain (<i>r<sub>s</sub></i> = -0.280) and cognitive domain (<i>r<sub>s</sub></i> = -0.520); with the Beck Depression Inventory score (<i>r<sub>s</sub></i><sub> </sub>= 0.610); with the Accessibility Perception Questionnaire displacement domain (<i>r<sub>s</sub></i><sub> </sub>= -0.620) and psycho-affective domain (<i>r<sub>s</sub></i><sub> </sub>= 0.530). Mean scores obtained on the P-scale differed significantly between the groups with and without depressive symptoms (<i>P</i> = 0.001), neuropathic pain (<i>P</i> = 0.033), and functional dependence (<i>P</i> = 0.001). There was no difference between the paraplegic and quadriplegic groups. The P-scale had adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.873), excellent test-retest reliability (ICC<sub>2,1 </sub>= 0.992; 95% CI = 0.987-0.994), and in the Bland-Altman plot analysis, only six values fell outside the limits of agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results support the use of the P-scale to assess the participation of individuals with SCI in research and clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"661-668"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378679/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Construct validity and reliability of the participation scale (P-scale) in individuals with spinal cord injury.\",\"authors\":\"Patrícia Avelar Viana Espindula, Alessandra de Carvalho Bastone, Ana Paula Santos\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10790268.2023.2183327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the reliability and the construct validity of the Participation Scale (P-scale) in adults with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>: SARAH Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals, Brazil.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>: One hundred individuals with SCI.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>: Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>: Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were investigated. To assess reliability the P-scale was applied twice with a one-week interval. To assess construct validity the Functional Independence Measure, the Beck Depression Inventory, and the Accessibility Perception Questionnaire were administered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the participants was 38.9 ± 12.80 years. The majority were male (70%) and had traumatic injuries (74%). The P-scale showed significant correlations with the Functional Independence Measure motor domain (<i>r<sub>s</sub></i> = -0.280) and cognitive domain (<i>r<sub>s</sub></i> = -0.520); with the Beck Depression Inventory score (<i>r<sub>s</sub></i><sub> </sub>= 0.610); with the Accessibility Perception Questionnaire displacement domain (<i>r<sub>s</sub></i><sub> </sub>= -0.620) and psycho-affective domain (<i>r<sub>s</sub></i><sub> </sub>= 0.530). Mean scores obtained on the P-scale differed significantly between the groups with and without depressive symptoms (<i>P</i> = 0.001), neuropathic pain (<i>P</i> = 0.033), and functional dependence (<i>P</i> = 0.001). There was no difference between the paraplegic and quadriplegic groups. The P-scale had adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.873), excellent test-retest reliability (ICC<sub>2,1 </sub>= 0.992; 95% CI = 0.987-0.994), and in the Bland-Altman plot analysis, only six values fell outside the limits of agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results support the use of the P-scale to assess the participation of individuals with SCI in research and clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"661-668\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378679/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2023.2183327\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2023.2183327","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Construct validity and reliability of the participation scale (P-scale) in individuals with spinal cord injury.
Objectives: To investigate the reliability and the construct validity of the Participation Scale (P-scale) in adults with Spinal Cord Injury (SCI).
Design: A cross-sectional study.
Setting: : SARAH Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals, Brazil.
Participants: : One hundred individuals with SCI.
Interventions: : Not applicable.
Outcome measures: : Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were investigated. To assess reliability the P-scale was applied twice with a one-week interval. To assess construct validity the Functional Independence Measure, the Beck Depression Inventory, and the Accessibility Perception Questionnaire were administered.
Results: The mean age of the participants was 38.9 ± 12.80 years. The majority were male (70%) and had traumatic injuries (74%). The P-scale showed significant correlations with the Functional Independence Measure motor domain (rs = -0.280) and cognitive domain (rs = -0.520); with the Beck Depression Inventory score (rs= 0.610); with the Accessibility Perception Questionnaire displacement domain (rs= -0.620) and psycho-affective domain (rs= 0.530). Mean scores obtained on the P-scale differed significantly between the groups with and without depressive symptoms (P = 0.001), neuropathic pain (P = 0.033), and functional dependence (P = 0.001). There was no difference between the paraplegic and quadriplegic groups. The P-scale had adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.873), excellent test-retest reliability (ICC2,1 = 0.992; 95% CI = 0.987-0.994), and in the Bland-Altman plot analysis, only six values fell outside the limits of agreement.
Conclusion: Our results support the use of the P-scale to assess the participation of individuals with SCI in research and clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.