Integrated strategies for chemotherapy cycles in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: Real-world data from two epidemic centers guiding decision-making.

Objective: Two cycles of induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by 2 cycles of platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) (2IC+2CCRT) for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) is widely adopted but not evidence-confirmed. This study aimed to determine the clinical value of 2IC+2CCRT regarding efficacy, toxicity and cost-effectiveness.

Methods: This real-world study from two epidemic centers used propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analyses. The enrolled patients were divided into three groups based on treatment modality: Group A (2IC+2CCRT), Group B (3IC+2CCRT or 2IC+3CCRT) and Group C (3IC+3CCRT). Long-term survival, acute toxicities and cost-effectiveness were compared among the groups. We developed a prognostic model dividing the population into high- and low-risk cohorts, and survivals including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) were compared among the three groups according to certain risk stratifications.

Results: Of 4,042 patients, 1,175 were enrolled, with 660, 419, and 96 included in Groups A, B and C, respectively. Five-year survivals were similar among the three groups after PSM and confirmed by IPTW. Grade 3-4 neutropenia and leukocytopenia were significantly higher in Groups C and B than in Group A (52.1% vs. 41.5% vs. 25.2%; 41.7% vs. 32.7% vs. 25.0%) as were grade 3-4 nausea/vomiting and oral mucositis (29.2% vs. 15.0% vs. 6.1%; 32.3% vs. 25.3% vs. 18.0%). Cost-effective analysis suggested that 2IC+2CCRT was the least expensive, while the health benefits were similar to those of the other groups. Further exploration showed that 2IC+2CCRT tended to be associated with a shorter PFS in high-risk patients, while 3IC+3CCRT potentially contributed to poor PFS in low-risk individuals, mainly reflected by LRRFS.

Conclusions: In LA-NPC patients, 2IC+2CCRT was the optimal choice regarding efficacy, toxicity and cost-effectiveness; however, 2IC+2CCRT and 3IC+3CCRT probably shortened LRRFS in high- and low-risk populations, respectively.