恒定和可变中等强度负荷对门诊心脏康复患者峰值摄氧量的影响。

Circulation Reports Pub Date : 2023-03-31 eCollection Date: 2023-05-10 DOI:10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0024
Hajime Saeki, Miho Kuramoto, Yoshinori Iida, Kaori Yasumura, Yoh Arita, Nobuyuki Ogasawara
{"title":"恒定和可变中等强度负荷对门诊心脏康复患者峰值摄氧量的影响。","authors":"Hajime Saeki, Miho Kuramoto, Yoshinori Iida, Kaori Yasumura, Yoh Arita, Nobuyuki Ogasawara","doi":"10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> In outpatient center-based cardiac rehabilitation (O-CBCR), moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) based on the anaerobic threshold (AT) determined by cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing is recommended. However, it is unclear whether differences in exercise intensity within the MICT domain affect peak oxygen uptake (%peakV̇O<sub>2</sub>). <b><i>Methods and Results:</i></b> We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent O-CBCR at Japan Community Healthcare Organization Osaka Hospital. Those treated with the constant-load method were designated as Group A (n=38), whereas those treated with the variable-load method were designated as Group B (n=48). Although the change in exercise intensity was significantly greater in Group B by approximately 4.5 W, the change in %peakV̇O<sub>2</sub> was not significantly different between groups. Group A had a significantly longer exercise time than Group B (by approximately 4-5 min). No deaths or hospitalizations occurred in either group. The percentage of episodes with exercise cessation was similar between the 2 groups, but the percentage of episodes with load reduction was significantly higher in Group B, mostly because of the increased heart rate. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In supervised MICT based on AT, the variable-load method increased exercise intensity more than the constant-load method without severe complications, but did not improve %peakV̇O<sub>2</sub>.</p>","PeriodicalId":10276,"journal":{"name":"Circulation Reports","volume":"5 5","pages":"167-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6f/63/circrep-5-167.PMC10166670.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Constant vs. Variable Moderate-Intensity Load on Peak Oxygen Uptake in Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation.\",\"authors\":\"Hajime Saeki, Miho Kuramoto, Yoshinori Iida, Kaori Yasumura, Yoh Arita, Nobuyuki Ogasawara\",\"doi\":\"10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> In outpatient center-based cardiac rehabilitation (O-CBCR), moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) based on the anaerobic threshold (AT) determined by cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing is recommended. However, it is unclear whether differences in exercise intensity within the MICT domain affect peak oxygen uptake (%peakV̇O<sub>2</sub>). <b><i>Methods and Results:</i></b> We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent O-CBCR at Japan Community Healthcare Organization Osaka Hospital. Those treated with the constant-load method were designated as Group A (n=38), whereas those treated with the variable-load method were designated as Group B (n=48). Although the change in exercise intensity was significantly greater in Group B by approximately 4.5 W, the change in %peakV̇O<sub>2</sub> was not significantly different between groups. Group A had a significantly longer exercise time than Group B (by approximately 4-5 min). No deaths or hospitalizations occurred in either group. The percentage of episodes with exercise cessation was similar between the 2 groups, but the percentage of episodes with load reduction was significantly higher in Group B, mostly because of the increased heart rate. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In supervised MICT based on AT, the variable-load method increased exercise intensity more than the constant-load method without severe complications, but did not improve %peakV̇O<sub>2</sub>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation Reports\",\"volume\":\"5 5\",\"pages\":\"167-176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6f/63/circrep-5-167.PMC10166670.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.CR-23-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在基于门诊中心的心脏康复(O-CBCR)中,建议基于心肺运动压力测试确定的无氧阈值(AT)的中等强度连续训练(MICT)。然而,目前尚不清楚MICT域内运动强度的差异是否会影响峰值摄氧量(%peakV̇O2)。方法 和 结果:我们回顾性评估了在日本社区医疗组织大阪医院接受O-CBCR的患者。用恒定负荷法治疗的患者被指定为A组(n=38),而用可变负荷法治疗者被指定为B组(n=48)。尽管B组运动强度的变化显著增加了约4.5W,但两组之间%peakV̇O2的变化没有显著差异。A组的运动时间明显长于B组(约4-5分钟)。两组均未发生死亡或住院。两组运动停止的发作百分比相似,但B组负荷减少的发作百分比显著较高,主要是因为心率增加。结论:在基于AT的监督MICT中,可变负荷法比恒定负荷法增加了运动强度,没有严重并发症,但没有改善%peakV̇O2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Constant vs. Variable Moderate-Intensity Load on Peak Oxygen Uptake in Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation.

Background: In outpatient center-based cardiac rehabilitation (O-CBCR), moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) based on the anaerobic threshold (AT) determined by cardiopulmonary exercise stress testing is recommended. However, it is unclear whether differences in exercise intensity within the MICT domain affect peak oxygen uptake (%peakV̇O2). Methods and Results: We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent O-CBCR at Japan Community Healthcare Organization Osaka Hospital. Those treated with the constant-load method were designated as Group A (n=38), whereas those treated with the variable-load method were designated as Group B (n=48). Although the change in exercise intensity was significantly greater in Group B by approximately 4.5 W, the change in %peakV̇O2 was not significantly different between groups. Group A had a significantly longer exercise time than Group B (by approximately 4-5 min). No deaths or hospitalizations occurred in either group. The percentage of episodes with exercise cessation was similar between the 2 groups, but the percentage of episodes with load reduction was significantly higher in Group B, mostly because of the increased heart rate. Conclusions: In supervised MICT based on AT, the variable-load method increased exercise intensity more than the constant-load method without severe complications, but did not improve %peakV̇O2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Takotsubo Syndrome in Older Men ― Clinical Characteristics Differ by Sex and Age ― Chopstick Stab in the Right Ventricle Clinical Impact of Preoperative Symptoms of Aortic Stenosis on Prognosis After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Effect of a 3-Month Single-Drug Approach Using Rivaroxaban for Symptomatic Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis Nationwide Survey on Transitional Care for Patients With Childhood-Onset Cardiomyopathy in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1