Ella H Leung, Daniel J Oh, Shannon E Alderson, Joshlynn Bracy, Mia McLeod, Litzi I Perez, Alexander Bottini, David Chin Yee, Krishna Mukkamala
{"title":"Faricimab治疗难治性新血管年龄相关性黄斑变性的初步现实经验。","authors":"Ella H Leung, Daniel J Oh, Shannon E Alderson, Joshlynn Bracy, Mia McLeod, Litzi I Perez, Alexander Bottini, David Chin Yee, Krishna Mukkamala","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S409822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the initial efficacy and safety of intravitreal faricimab in eyes previously treated for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nARMD).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of all patients with nARMD previously treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections who received at least 3 intravitreal faricimab injections with at least 3 months of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 190 eyes were included. Patients received a mean of 34.2±23 anti-VEGF injections over 182.41±128 weeks prior to switching to faricimab. Patients then received a mean of 6.99±2.3 faricimab injections with an average 34.88±8.2 weeks of follow-up. The mean best corrected visual acuities improved from 0.33±0.32 logMAR ≈20/43 to 0.27±0.32 logMAR ≈20/37 (<i>P</i>=0.0022). The central subfield thickness (CST) improved from 312±87μm to 287±71μm (<i>P</i><0.0001). At the last clinical visit, 24% had no subretinal fluid or intraretinal fluid on optical coherence tomography. The mean dosing interval between the last two consecutive faricimab injections (7.64±6.2 weeks) was significantly longer than that for ranibizumab (5.16±2.0 weeks, <i>P</i><0.001) or aflibercept (5.57±3.6 weeks, <i>P</i><0.001). No patients developed idiopathic intraocular inflammation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intravitreal faricimab was associated with improved vision and CSTs, even in treatment-resistant nARMD eyes. The mean last dosing interval for faricimab was longer than for ranibizumab or aflibercept. No significant adverse events were directly attributed to faricimab during the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":10442,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d0/8c/opth-17-1287.PMC10167970.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial Real-World Experience with Faricimab in Treatment-Resistant Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.\",\"authors\":\"Ella H Leung, Daniel J Oh, Shannon E Alderson, Joshlynn Bracy, Mia McLeod, Litzi I Perez, Alexander Bottini, David Chin Yee, Krishna Mukkamala\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTH.S409822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the initial efficacy and safety of intravitreal faricimab in eyes previously treated for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nARMD).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective review of all patients with nARMD previously treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections who received at least 3 intravitreal faricimab injections with at least 3 months of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 190 eyes were included. Patients received a mean of 34.2±23 anti-VEGF injections over 182.41±128 weeks prior to switching to faricimab. Patients then received a mean of 6.99±2.3 faricimab injections with an average 34.88±8.2 weeks of follow-up. The mean best corrected visual acuities improved from 0.33±0.32 logMAR ≈20/43 to 0.27±0.32 logMAR ≈20/37 (<i>P</i>=0.0022). The central subfield thickness (CST) improved from 312±87μm to 287±71μm (<i>P</i><0.0001). At the last clinical visit, 24% had no subretinal fluid or intraretinal fluid on optical coherence tomography. The mean dosing interval between the last two consecutive faricimab injections (7.64±6.2 weeks) was significantly longer than that for ranibizumab (5.16±2.0 weeks, <i>P</i><0.001) or aflibercept (5.57±3.6 weeks, <i>P</i><0.001). No patients developed idiopathic intraocular inflammation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intravitreal faricimab was associated with improved vision and CSTs, even in treatment-resistant nARMD eyes. The mean last dosing interval for faricimab was longer than for ranibizumab or aflibercept. No significant adverse events were directly attributed to faricimab during the study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d0/8c/opth-17-1287.PMC10167970.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S409822\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S409822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Initial Real-World Experience with Faricimab in Treatment-Resistant Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.
Purpose: To evaluate the initial efficacy and safety of intravitreal faricimab in eyes previously treated for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nARMD).
Patients and methods: A retrospective review of all patients with nARMD previously treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections who received at least 3 intravitreal faricimab injections with at least 3 months of follow-up.
Results: A total of 190 eyes were included. Patients received a mean of 34.2±23 anti-VEGF injections over 182.41±128 weeks prior to switching to faricimab. Patients then received a mean of 6.99±2.3 faricimab injections with an average 34.88±8.2 weeks of follow-up. The mean best corrected visual acuities improved from 0.33±0.32 logMAR ≈20/43 to 0.27±0.32 logMAR ≈20/37 (P=0.0022). The central subfield thickness (CST) improved from 312±87μm to 287±71μm (P<0.0001). At the last clinical visit, 24% had no subretinal fluid or intraretinal fluid on optical coherence tomography. The mean dosing interval between the last two consecutive faricimab injections (7.64±6.2 weeks) was significantly longer than that for ranibizumab (5.16±2.0 weeks, P<0.001) or aflibercept (5.57±3.6 weeks, P<0.001). No patients developed idiopathic intraocular inflammation.
Conclusion: Intravitreal faricimab was associated with improved vision and CSTs, even in treatment-resistant nARMD eyes. The mean last dosing interval for faricimab was longer than for ranibizumab or aflibercept. No significant adverse events were directly attributed to faricimab during the study.