重症哮喘患者从最初选择生物制剂到生物制剂间转换的生物治疗管理。

IF 0.7 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Tuberkuloz ve Toraks-Tuberculosis and Thorax Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.5578/tt.20239910
İnsu Yılmaz, Gülden Paçacı Çetin, Bahar Arslan, Serhat Şeker, Hatice Eylül Bozkurt Yılmaz, Elif Aktaş Yapıcı, Serpil Köylüce, Elif Açar
{"title":"重症哮喘患者从最初选择生物制剂到生物制剂间转换的生物治疗管理。","authors":"İnsu Yılmaz, Gülden Paçacı Çetin, Bahar Arslan, Serhat Şeker, Hatice Eylül Bozkurt Yılmaz, Elif Aktaş Yapıcı, Serpil Köylüce, Elif Açar","doi":"10.5578/tt.20239910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this review is to elaborate the management of biologic therapy from initial selection to switching biologics in severe asthma. A nonsystematic review was performed for biological therapy management in severe asthma. Depending on clinical characteristics and biomarkers, selecting the preferred biologic based on super-responder criteria from previous studies may result in adequate clinical efficacy in most patients. On the other hand, no matter how carefully the choice is made, in some patients, it may be necessary to discontinue the drug due to suboptimal clinical response or even no response. This may result in the need to switch to a different biological therapy. How long the biological treatment of patients whose asthma is controlled with biologics will be continued and according to which criteria they will be terminated remains unclear. It has been shown that in patients with a long history of good response to biologics, asthma control may be impaired when biologics are discontinued, while it may persist in others. Therefore, discontinuation of biologics may be a viable strategy in a particular patient group. Clinicians should make the best use of all predictive factors to identify patients who will most benefit from each biologic. Patients who do not meet a predefined response criterion after sufficient time for response evaluation and who are eligible for one or more alternative biological agents should be offered the opportunity to switch to another biologic. There is no consensus on when the biologics used in severe asthma that produce favorable results should be discontinued. In our opinion, treatment should continue for at least five years, as premature termination may potentially deteriorate asthma control.</p>","PeriodicalId":45521,"journal":{"name":"Tuberkuloz ve Toraks-Tuberculosis and Thorax","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10854061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biological therapy management from the initial selection of biologics to switching between biologics in severe asthma.\",\"authors\":\"İnsu Yılmaz, Gülden Paçacı Çetin, Bahar Arslan, Serhat Şeker, Hatice Eylül Bozkurt Yılmaz, Elif Aktaş Yapıcı, Serpil Köylüce, Elif Açar\",\"doi\":\"10.5578/tt.20239910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this review is to elaborate the management of biologic therapy from initial selection to switching biologics in severe asthma. A nonsystematic review was performed for biological therapy management in severe asthma. Depending on clinical characteristics and biomarkers, selecting the preferred biologic based on super-responder criteria from previous studies may result in adequate clinical efficacy in most patients. On the other hand, no matter how carefully the choice is made, in some patients, it may be necessary to discontinue the drug due to suboptimal clinical response or even no response. This may result in the need to switch to a different biological therapy. How long the biological treatment of patients whose asthma is controlled with biologics will be continued and according to which criteria they will be terminated remains unclear. It has been shown that in patients with a long history of good response to biologics, asthma control may be impaired when biologics are discontinued, while it may persist in others. Therefore, discontinuation of biologics may be a viable strategy in a particular patient group. Clinicians should make the best use of all predictive factors to identify patients who will most benefit from each biologic. Patients who do not meet a predefined response criterion after sufficient time for response evaluation and who are eligible for one or more alternative biological agents should be offered the opportunity to switch to another biologic. There is no consensus on when the biologics used in severe asthma that produce favorable results should be discontinued. In our opinion, treatment should continue for at least five years, as premature termination may potentially deteriorate asthma control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tuberkuloz ve Toraks-Tuberculosis and Thorax\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10854061/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tuberkuloz ve Toraks-Tuberculosis and Thorax\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5578/tt.20239910\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberkuloz ve Toraks-Tuberculosis and Thorax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5578/tt.20239910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本综述旨在阐述重症哮喘患者从最初选择到更换生物制剂的生物治疗管理。本文对重症哮喘患者的生物制剂治疗管理进行了非系统性综述。根据临床特征和生物标志物,按照以往研究中的超级应答者标准选择首选生物制剂,可能会使大多数患者获得足够的临床疗效。另一方面,无论如何谨慎选择,有些患者可能会因临床反应不佳甚至无反应而需要停药。这可能导致需要改用其他生物疗法。对于使用生物制剂控制哮喘的患者,其生物治疗将持续多长时间,以及根据哪些标准终止治疗,目前仍不清楚。有研究表明,对生物制剂长期反应良好的患者,停用生物制剂后哮喘控制可能会受到影响,而其他患者的哮喘控制可能会持续。因此,停用生物制剂可能是特定患者群体的一种可行策略。临床医生应充分利用所有预测因素来确定哪些患者最能从每种生物制剂中获益。如果患者在经过足够时间的反应评估后仍未达到预定的反应标准,且有资格使用一种或多种替代生物制剂,则应向其提供改用另一种生物制剂的机会。对于重症哮喘患者使用的生物制剂产生良好疗效后何时停药,目前还没有达成共识。我们认为,治疗应持续至少五年,因为过早终止治疗可能会使哮喘控制恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Biological therapy management from the initial selection of biologics to switching between biologics in severe asthma.

The aim of this review is to elaborate the management of biologic therapy from initial selection to switching biologics in severe asthma. A nonsystematic review was performed for biological therapy management in severe asthma. Depending on clinical characteristics and biomarkers, selecting the preferred biologic based on super-responder criteria from previous studies may result in adequate clinical efficacy in most patients. On the other hand, no matter how carefully the choice is made, in some patients, it may be necessary to discontinue the drug due to suboptimal clinical response or even no response. This may result in the need to switch to a different biological therapy. How long the biological treatment of patients whose asthma is controlled with biologics will be continued and according to which criteria they will be terminated remains unclear. It has been shown that in patients with a long history of good response to biologics, asthma control may be impaired when biologics are discontinued, while it may persist in others. Therefore, discontinuation of biologics may be a viable strategy in a particular patient group. Clinicians should make the best use of all predictive factors to identify patients who will most benefit from each biologic. Patients who do not meet a predefined response criterion after sufficient time for response evaluation and who are eligible for one or more alternative biological agents should be offered the opportunity to switch to another biologic. There is no consensus on when the biologics used in severe asthma that produce favorable results should be discontinued. In our opinion, treatment should continue for at least five years, as premature termination may potentially deteriorate asthma control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
A patient with widespread skin lesions presenting with massive pleural effusion. A perspective on the scope of videoconferencing-based telemedicine in respiratory diseases outpatient clinic. Analysis of one-year follow-up results and treatment costs of patients with PTE in a tertiary care center. Analysis of post-COVID symptoms and predisposing factors for chronic post-COVID syndrome. Characteristics of adverse reactions due to subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy applied between 2011-2021: Single center experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1